Multimodal Analgesia Versus Routine Care Pain Management
NCT ID: NCT01861743
Last Updated: 2018-08-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-04-30
2017-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Lumbar spine surgery is particularly painful, often requiring a multi-day hospitalization. The most common post-operative analgesia used in spine surgery is narcotic medication delivered via an intravenous patient controlled analgesia (IV PCA).
A multimodal peri-operative pain management protocol for spine surgery has the potential to not only decrease pain but also to improve recovery, decrease narcotic consumption, decrease length of stay in the hospital and reduce both direct and indirect hospital costs.
The purpose of this study is to determine if post-operative pain and rate of recovery are improved in patients undergoing spine surgery using MMA compared to usual analgesic care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Multimodal Analgesia vs. Routine Care Pain Management for Lumbar Spine Fusion Surgery: A Prospective Randomized Study
NCT02202369
Multimodal Perioperative Pain Management
NCT01513564
The Use of Intrathecal Morphine in the Management of Acute Pain Following Decompressive Lumbar Spinal Surgery
NCT01053039
Multimodal Pain Package vs. Regular Formulation for Pain Management in Ambulatory Spinal Surgery
NCT05965492
Total Hip Arthroplasty Outcomes With Regional and Multimodal Analgesia
NCT02186795
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. decreased post-operative pain compared to patients receiving usual care for pain management.
2. shorter hospital LOS compared to patients receiving usual care pain management.
3. fewer analgesic-related post-operative complications (urinary retention, ileus, etc) compared to patients receiving usual care pain management.
4. improved physical functioning at the time of hospital discharge compared to patients receiving usual care pain management.
5. better short and long term outcomes. Subjects will be randomized to MMA (Group 1) or usual care (Group 2). The unit of randomization will be a week (Monday through Sunday). Each week will randomly be assigned to MMA or usual care. Subjects who are hospitalized into a consecutive week will continue with the pain regimen they were assigned upon hospitalization.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Multimodal analgesia
multiple analgesic medications utilized in a synergistic manner to control pain while minimizing side-effects of individual drugs due to decreased doses. This includes pre-operative patient education, intra-operative pain management and post-operative pain protocols.
Multimodal Analgesia
Subjects are given medications preop, intraop and postop that implement a multi-modal approach to managing pain.
Patient Controlled analgesia
Pain management using patient controlled narcotic analgesia.
Patient controlled analgesia
Subjects will be treated with patient controlled narcotic analgesia for pain management.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Multimodal Analgesia
Subjects are given medications preop, intraop and postop that implement a multi-modal approach to managing pain.
Patient controlled analgesia
Subjects will be treated with patient controlled narcotic analgesia for pain management.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients able to provide informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Current liver disease with documented liver function test abnormality
* Current renal disese with documented glomerular filtration rate (GFR) \< 60 mL/min/1.73m2
* Baseline (pre-operative) opioid use greater than 30 mg of morphine equivalents/day
* Active alcohol dependence
* Active illicit drug dependence
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rush University Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Frank M. Phillips, MD
MD
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Frank M Phillips, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rush University Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rush University Medical Center-Orthopedic Spine
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim JC, Choi YS, Kim KN, Shim JK, Lee JY, Kwak YL. Effective dose of peri-operative oral pregabalin as an adjunct to multimodal analgesic regimen in lumbar spinal fusion surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Mar 15;36(6):428-33. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3181d26708.
Rajpal S, Gordon DB, Pellino TA, Strayer AL, Brost D, Trost GR, Zdeblick TA, Resnick DK. Comparison of perioperative oral multimodal analgesia versus IV PCA for spine surgery. J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Apr;23(2):139-45. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0b013e3181cf07ee.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13020402
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.