DESTINY TRIAL (Inspiron x Biomatrix)

NCT ID: NCT01856088

Last Updated: 2019-03-25

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

170 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-31

Study Completion Date

2019-03-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main objective of this study is to evaluate the effectiveness of stent Inspiron ™ sirolimus-eluting and coating the abluminal biodegradable stent Biomatrix Flex ™ lesions in native coronary arteries.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a study of non-inferiority, multicentre, prospective, randomized into two treatment arms: I) Inspiron ™ stent eluting sirolimus or II) ™ Biomatrix stent eluting biolimus. Are a total of 165 randomized patients.

Patients will be followed for 60 months after the procedure. All new patients will be undergoing angiography for evaluation at 9 months. A subgroup of 60 patients will be evaluated with volumetric intravascular ultrasound at 9 months. Also, a subgroup of 21 patients will be evaluated with optical coherence tomography at the end of the index procedure and 9 months. It is anticipated that the total study duration is 72 months: 12 months to complete the admission of patients and 60 months of follow-up.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Coronary Artery Disease

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Inspiron Stent

Stent Inspiron with Sirolimus

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Inspiron Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

stent implantation

Biomatrix Flex Stent

Stent Biomatrix Flex with biolimus

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Biomatrix Flex Stent

Intervention Type DEVICE

stent implantation

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Inspiron Stent

stent implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Biomatrix Flex Stent

stent implantation

Intervention Type DEVICE

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Angioplasty Angioplasty

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Age \> 18 years;
2. Symptomatic ischemic heart disease and / or objective evidence of myocardial ischemia with one or two target lesions located in different epicardial vessels;
3. A(s) lesion(s) to target(m) must be:

1. Again (not restenotic);
2. Located in a native coronary artery diameter from 2.5 to 3.5 mm (visual);
3. Can be treated with a single stent up to 29 mm in length;
4. Obstruction with stenosis \> 50% diameter (visual);
4. Acceptable candidate for CABG;
5. The patient will be informed of the nature of the study, agree with their rules and provide a written informed consent approved by the local Ethics Committee.

Exclusion Criteria

1. Women of childbearing age with no history of surgical sterilization;
2. Myocardial infarction with Q wave occurred in the last 48 hours before the index procedure;
3. Myocardial infarction with or without Q wave with cardiac markers even at high levels;
4. Ejection fraction \< 30%;
5. Impaired renal function (creatinine\> 2.0 mg / dl) or calculated creatinine clearance \< 60 ml / min;
6. Platelet count \<100,000 cells/mm3 or \> 700,000 cells/mm3;
7. Total leukocyte count \<3000 cells/mm3;
8. Documented or suspected liver disease (including laboratory evidence of hepatitis);
9. Heart transplant recipient;
10. Known allergies to aspirin, clopidogrel, ticlopidine, paclitaxel, sirolimus, heparin or stainless steel;
11. Patient with a life expectancy less than 12 months;
12. Any significant medical condition which in the opinion of the investigator would interfere with the ideal of patient participation in this study;
13. Participation in other research in the last 12 months, unless there is direct benefit to the research subject;
14. Coronary angioplasty (with or without stenting) for less than 6 months anywhere in the target vessel;
15. Coronary angioplasty (with or without stenting) prior to any time in that segment Diste less than 5 mm (proximal or distal) of the lesion;
16. Coronary angioplasty (with or without stenting) scheduled in the first 12 months after the index procedure in any segment of the target vessel.


1. Restenotic target lesion;
2. Need for treatment for more than one lesion in the same vessel;
3. Need for treatment with three or more lesions in the same procedure;
4. Target vessel diameter \<2.5 mm or\> 3.5 mm (visual);
5. Target lesion long not susceptible to treatment with a single stent to 29mm in length, according to the judgment of the operator;
6. Lesion of the coronary artery unprotected ( \> 50% stenosis);
7. Angiographic thrombus;
8. Target lesion in surgical graft;
9. Total occlusion (TIMI anterograde flow 0 or 1);
10. Ostial lesion;
11. The target lesion bifurcation with side branch that may require intervention during the procedure, with or without stenting;
12. Injuries that are impossible to anticipate predilatation successfully or that is necessary to use rotablator;
13. The target vessel with excessive tortuosity.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Scitech Produtos Medicos Ltda

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Pedro Lemos

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Instituto do Coração - Incor

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Hospital Santa Izabel

Salvador, Estado de Bahia, Brazil

Site Status

Encore - Cardiologia e Radiologia Intervencionista

Goiânia, Goiás, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Cardiologico Costantini

Curitiba, Paraná, Brazil

Site Status

Instituto de Cardiologia do Rio Grande do Sul

Porto Alegre, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Bandeirantes de São Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Instituto Dante Pazzanese de Cardiologia

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Instituto de Assistência Médica ao Servidor Publico Estadual

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Instituto do Coração do Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da USP

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Santa Casa de Misericórdia de São Paulo

São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil

Site Status

Hospital Santa Marcelina

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Brazil

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lemos PA, Abizaid AA, Meireles GC, Sarmento-Leite R, Prudente M, Cantarelli M, Dourado AD, Mariani J Jr, Perin MA, Costantini C, Costa RA, Costa JR, Chamie D, Campos CA, Ribeiro E. Metallic Limus-Eluting Stents Abluminally Coated with Biodegradable Polymers: Angiographic and Clinical Comparison of a Novel Ultra-Thin Sirolimus Stent Versus Biolimus Stent in the DESTINY Randomized Trial. Cardiovasc Ther. 2015 Dec;33(6):367-71. doi: 10.1111/1755-5922.12159.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26352896 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://portal2.saude.gov.br/sisnep

National Information System on Ethics in Research Involving Human

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Scitech 004

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.