Treatment of Stress Urinary Incontinence Via Smartphone
NCT ID: NCT01848938
Last Updated: 2017-04-05
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
123 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2014-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effect of Peri-Urethral Stimulation on Intra-Urethral Pressure
NCT05900570
Web-based Management of Female Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT01032265
Patient Satisfaction Survey of Non-surgical Urinary Incontinence Treatment
NCT04064970
PFU vs. UDS in SUI
NCT06886997
Magnetic Stimulation as a Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence
NCT05952258
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The recommended first line treatment is pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT)which leads to improvement or cure in two-thirds of patients. In addition, life style changes, such as weight loss when obese, smoking cessation and reduction of fluid intake if high is recommended.
There is a need for new , flexible and easily accessible treatment programmes for female urinary incontinence. In our previous study, we compared two treatment programmes for SUI without face-to-face contact: one internet based and one sent by post, both based on three months of PFMT. In this randomized controlled trial of 250 women aged 18-70 years, we found highly significant improvements (p\<0.001) with large effect sizes (\>0,8)concerning primary outcomes (symptoms and quality of life scores) but no significant differences between groups. Compared with the postal group, more participants in the internet group perceived they were much or very much improved (40.9% vs 26.5%, p\<0.01, reported reduced usage of incontinence aids (59.5% vs 41.4%, p=0.02) and were satisfied with the treatment programme (84.8% vs 62.9%, p\<0.001).
The selling of smartphones is increasing rapidly. About 75% of all cellphones sold in Sweden today are smartphones. Two million adults in Sweden have a smartphone. Many smartphone owners have at least one health app on their phone. Exercise, diet, and weight apps are the most popular types.
From our previous experience of an Internet-based programme, we have developed a treatment program designed for smartphone. The effect of the treatment programme will be evaluated after three months by comparing the effect in the "smartphone group" with the effect in the "waiting group".
Participants are consecutively recruited through our website. They answer an online screening survey with automated immediated response for initial screening of eligibility criteria. Informed consent and leakage diary (number of episodes of urinary leakage during 48 hours) are sent by post. After that, they answer a web questionnaire and finally they are interviewed by a researcher to confirm the diagnosis SUI and to ascertain that the patient is well informed of the study procedure.
Women are then randomized to either of the two groups. Women in the smartphone group get a smartphone application for iphone or android. Follow-up after three months with a web questionnaire and a leakage diary. After that the waiting group get their smartphone application.
We aim to recruit 120 women aged 18 and older via our website www.tät.nu. In the power calculation we assume that the improvement in the symptom score (ICIQ UI SF) and the QOL score (ICIQ luts QOL)in the smartphone group will be similar to the improvement we found in the postal group in our previous study. We also assume that the waiting group will improve in some extent.
To detect a difference between groups, power 80%, 2-side test and significance 0,05, group size as follow
ICIQ UI SF Smartphone group improves 2.9 (SD3,1) and waiting group 1,0 (SD2,0); 30 in each group
ICIQ luts QOL Smartphone group improves 4.6 (SD6,7) and waiting group 2.0(SD3.0), 35 in each group
PGI (patient´s global impression of improvement). 26,5% improves much or very much (smartphone) and 4% (waiting group):39 in each group
We expect a drop out rate of 33% and thus need approximately 120 persons, 60 in each group.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Smartphone treatment
Smartphone treatment with PFMT.
Smartphone treatment with PFMT
A smartphone application with information on SUI, life style information, different programmes of PFMT with increasing severity, possibility to save statistics on training. The treatment period is three months
Waiting list
Waiting list for three months. They receive the smartphone application after follow-up.
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Smartphone treatment with PFMT
A smartphone application with information on SUI, life style information, different programmes of PFMT with increasing severity, possibility to save statistics on training. The treatment period is three months
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* leakage once a week or more often
* duration of symptoms for at least 6 months
* motivation and time to perform a 12 week long treatment with pelvic floor muscle training
* ability to read and write Swedish
* asset to smartphone
* possibility to send and receive email and asset to printer
* accept to be randomized to one of two groups; a treatment group or a waiting list group
Exclusion Criteria
* pregnancy
* former incontinence surgery
* known malignancy in lower abdomen
* difficulties with passing urine
* visual blood in urine
* intermenstrual bleeding
* severe psychiatric diagnosis
* neurological disease with affection on sensibility in legs or lower abdomen
* urge incontinence
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Umeå University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Eva Samuelsson
Associate professor, General Practitioner
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Eva Samuelsson, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Department of Public Health and Clinical Medicine, Umeå University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Umea University
Umeå, Umeå, Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Asklund I, Samuelsson E, Hamberg K, Umefjord G, Sjostrom M. User Experience of an App-Based Treatment for Stress Urinary Incontinence: Qualitative Interview Study. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Mar 14;21(3):e11296. doi: 10.2196/11296.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
JLL314561
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
FAS2008-0952
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ALFVLL222081
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
VisareNorr301811
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.