Dietetic Versus Topical Steroids for Pediatric Eosinophilic Esophagitis

NCT ID: NCT01846962

Last Updated: 2018-05-11

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

64 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2013-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Therapeutic strategies for eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) actually include: 1) allergen avoidance through dietary modifications, and 2) pharmacologic antiinflammatory therapy. Medical treatment is mainly based on topical administration of corticosteroids by swallowing fluticasone propionate or budesonide spray. Dietetic treatment with highest efficacy is elemental diet, consisting in exclusive feeding with amino-acid based formulas, often administered trough SNG. Alternative choices of acceptable efficacy are empirical six-foods elimination diet (cow's milk, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, fish) and targeted elimination diet based on the results of allergy tests. Most of the paediatric patients with EE respond to elemental or targeted elimination diets, and therefore such authors recommend elimination diets to be considered the treatment of choice in children. However, elimination diets can often be complex to follow and may be associated with poor adherence owing to the low palatability of a highly restricted diet. In non-compliant patients, especially in adolescents and young adults, it may be more practical to proceed first with corticosteroid treatment. In the case of partial response to elimination diets or corticosteroids, a combination of both treatment mod. However, there has been limited testing of these regimens in randomized controlled trials, while most of available literature is based on case series.

The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy of six-foods elimination diet, swallowed fluticasone, swallowed budesonide and oral viscous budesonide (OVB) in pediatric patients with active EoE. The investigators assessed the effects of randomly assigned treatment on clinical and endoscopic/histologic severity as primary and secondary outcomes, respectively. The investigators describe clinical, allergological, endoscopic and histological features, and pH study results, of our pediatric population.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) is characterized by significant eosinophilic infiltration of esophageal mucosa, leading to tissue damage and consequently to esophageal symptoms. The clinical presentation in childhood often mimics gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD), sometimes in association to feeding difficulties and failure to thrive. Later in life, the most common symptoms are dysphagia and food impaction, due to esophageal dysmotility. The progression of a non-recognized, untreated disease, is thought to lead to chronic esophageal inflammation with fibrosis and stenosis. Diagnosis requires multiple esophageal biopsies (at least 4 in both proximal and distal esophagus, regardless of gross appearance of mucosa) to demonstrate a mucosal infiltrate of at least 15 eosinophils for high power field (HPF) in patients with a normal pH study or refractory to acid-suppression therapy. Although the endoscopic examination may be unremarkable, endoscopic features of EoE have been well characterized and include: linear furrowing, concentric rings (thachealization), white spots (eosinophilic abscesses), Schatzki ring, strictures, and linear superficial mucosal tears occurring after introduction of the endoscope.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Eosinophilic Esophagitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

six-foods elimination diet

six-foods elimination diet. The standard panel of foods tested included the 6 most common allergenic foods in childhood (cow's milk, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, fish), plus foods that were suspiciously implicated in triggering an allergic reaction referred by patients or their parents. Both perennial (dust mite, Parietaria, Alternaria, cat and dog dander) and seasonal (grass pollen including Graminaceae, Olea europea, Platanus) aeroallergens have been tested.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

six-foods elimination diet

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

six-foods elimination diet. The standard panel of foods tested included the 6 most common allergenic foods in childhood (cow's milk, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, fish), plus foods that were suspiciously implicated in triggering an allergic reaction referred by patients or their parents. Both perennial (dust mite, Parietaria, Alternaria, cat and dog dander) and seasonal (grass pollen including Graminaceae, Olea europea, Platanus) aeroallergens have been tested.

fluticasone

The administered dose of topical steroid was 440mcg or 880mcg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to swallow puffs and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Fluticasone

Intervention Type DRUG

The administered dose of topical steroid was 440mcg or 880mcg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to swallow puffs and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Budesonide

The administered dose of topical steroid was 400mcg/day or 800 mcg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to swallow puffs and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Budesonide

Intervention Type DRUG

The administered dose of topical steroid was 400mcg or 800mcg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to swallow puffs and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Oral Viscous Budesonide (OVB)

The administered dose of topical steroid was 1 or mg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to prepare a homemade suspension of OVB prepared by mixing inhaled budesonide with viscous solutions of sodium alginate and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Oral Viscous Budesonide (OVB)

Intervention Type DRUG

The administered dose of topical steroid was 1mg/day or 2mg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to prepare a homemade suspension of OVB prepared by mixing inhaled budesonide with viscous solutions of sodium alginate and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Budesonide

The administered dose of topical steroid was 400mcg or 800mcg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to swallow puffs and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Fluticasone

The administered dose of topical steroid was 440mcg or 880mcg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to swallow puffs and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

six-foods elimination diet

six-foods elimination diet. The standard panel of foods tested included the 6 most common allergenic foods in childhood (cow's milk, egg, soy, wheat, peanuts, fish), plus foods that were suspiciously implicated in triggering an allergic reaction referred by patients or their parents. Both perennial (dust mite, Parietaria, Alternaria, cat and dog dander) and seasonal (grass pollen including Graminaceae, Olea europea, Platanus) aeroallergens have been tested.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Oral Viscous Budesonide (OVB)

The administered dose of topical steroid was 1mg/day or 2mg/day (\<150 cm or \>150 cm). Patients were trained to prepare a homemade suspension of OVB prepared by mixing inhaled budesonide with viscous solutions of sodium alginate and to non eat or drink fo 30 minutes after ingestion. Patients noncompliant with therapy, monthly assessed by Pediatric Allergologists, were withdrawn from the study.

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

\- suspected, or previously diagnosed, EoE in phase of clinical activity.

Diagnostic criteria were:

1. suggestive esophageal symptoms (GERD-like disease, dysphagia, food impaction);
2. a negative 24 hours pH-impedenzometric study or, whether positive, the refractoriness to a high dose proton pump inhibitor (PPI) therapy for at least 8 weeks;
3. the histological demonstration of \>15/20 eosinophils/HPF on at least 1 esophageal biopsy. Patients who received any dietetic or antiinflammatory treatment in the last 6 months were dropped out, and no allergy therapy was allowed during the study

Exclusion Criteria

* diagnosis of concomitant inflammatory, rheumatic or infectious disease,
* and the assumption of any dietetic or therapy since the clinical onset.
Minimum Eligible Age

6 Months

Maximum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Azienda Policlinico Umberto I

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Salvatore Oliva

MD

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Departments of Pediatrics, Sapienza - University of Rome

Rome, , Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

Pediatric-EoE

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Budesonide for Eosinophilic Esophagitis
NCT00271349 COMPLETED PHASE2