Improving Adolescent Vaccination in Appalachian Kentucky
NCT ID: NCT01838161
Last Updated: 2019-05-07
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
597 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-04-30
2016-01-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Using Boot Camp Translation to Address Rural Disparities in Adolescent Vaccination
NCT03955757
An Adaptive Prenatal Intervention to Increase Childhood Vaccinations
NCT05795855
Vaccine Acceptance in Pregnant Minority Women
NCT01740310
Mhealth Supported Bundle to Improve Vaccination Completion
NCT05520736
Wastewater Surveillance to Boost COVID-19 Vaccine Uptake
NCT05766189
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Part I of the INSPIRE intervention development will involve formative research interviews conducted with parents of adolescents. Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children. Participants will be a convenience sample recruited through contacts in local public health departments and community nurses recruited by flyer and the research study coordinators (UK study personnel). Interview sessions will be scheduled in advance and will take approximately 30 minutes.
Part II of the INSPIRE intervention development will be evaluated in a small clinic-based pilot study using the same pre-test/post-test intervention design as in the planned (Part III) trial. For the pilot testing, the investigators will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents. Eligible parents who are coming in for non-acute care appointments will be asked by a research nurse to enroll in a research study. The Investigator will then administer a pretest survey, expose participants (parents) to vignette condition using the iPad in the clinic, and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines for their child as well as perceived message effectiveness (for the vignette). At the conclusion of the study, the research personnel administering the study will refer the adolescent to the clinic staff who will offer adolescent vaccines at the conclusion of the study (and/or a cue to schedule an appointment for the adolescent to visit the clinic) and will be able to examine actual behavior by receiving informed consent (from parents and adolescent) for limited medical record review (to track adolescent receipt of vaccinations). The Investigator will perform this pilot study in one Kentucky River Area District health department clinic with 30 parents. This method has been used to pilot past interventions, and it is expected that this allow us to correct for any problems in either the design of the survey assessment or the intervention. If needed, the investigator can tweak the intervention and re-pilot using the same procedures before the randomized controlled trial. This pilot test will also provide the advantage of assuring us that the intervention procedure can translate to the clinic setting. The Investigator has experience with this translation from our 1-2-3 Pap video intervention which the investigators began in social settings (recruiting people at school and other community events) and moved into the clinic setting for dissemination.
Part III of the INSPIRE project will be evaluated in a site-based group randomized controlled trial design, with individual-level randomization also occurring within the intervention group. Community vaccination clinic and health education sites (staffed by local health department contracted personnel and project nurses) in the intervention and control conditions will be matched on percentage of free/reduced school lunch and relevant demographics. At the end of Year 1, one health site in each pair will be randomized to the enhanced video educational intervention (video vignettes + standard of care social marketing vaccine event) or a standard of care vaccination campaign (standard of care health department vaccine event) comparison group. Individuals in the intervention group randomized condition also will be randomized when recruitment occurs in non-school based locations. Assessments will be conducted using Automated iPad Audio Assisted Interviewing techniques at pretest, immediate post-test, and then medical record review at 1 month and 9 month follow-up points. The medical record review will entail examining the medical record for each adolescent vaccine received by the patient. Thus, the investigators will be able to examine behavior change (i.e., receipt of vaccination) for each of the different vaccine types and their single or multi-dose outcomes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Part I
Interview questions will focus on reticence to vaccinate children.
Part I
Parental Interviews
Part II
We will pilot the vaccination vignettes in a health department (clinical) setting with eligible parents of adolescents.
* a pretest survey
* the video vignette
* and a post-test survey measuring intention to receive appropriate adolescent vaccines
Part II
Parents will be exposed to an educational video intervention if they are enrolled in this intervention condition.
Part III
* enhanced video educational intervention (video vignettes + standard of care vaccine event)
* standard of care vaccination event
Part III
•video educational
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Part II
Parents will be exposed to an educational video intervention if they are enrolled in this intervention condition.
Part III
•video educational
Part I
Parental Interviews
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Parents of children 11-18 years of age.
Exclusion Criteria
* Allergy to vaccinations
* Parent has made an informed decision not to vaccinate their child
11 Years
70 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
INDUSTRY
University of Kentucky
OTHER
University of Minnesota
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Elisia Cohen, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Kentucky
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
University of Kentucky
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Cohen, E. L. and K. J. Head (2014).
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
13-0026-P4S
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.