Prediction of Outcome After Chemoradiotherapy for Head and Neck Cancer Using Functional Imaging and Tumor Biology
NCT ID: NCT01829646
Last Updated: 2023-03-31
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
RECRUITING
NA
120 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-03-31
2026-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Feasibility Study on Adaptive 18F-FDG-guided Radiotherapy for Recurrent and Second Primary Head and Neck Cancer in the Previously Irradiated Territory.
NCT01427010
Personalised Postoperative Radiochemotherapy in Patients With Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02666885
Predictive Modelling for Patient Stratification According to Treatment-related Toxicity and Survival After Chemoradiation for Head and Neck Cancer
NCT02103010
A Feasibility Study On Continuous Adaptive [18f]Fdg-Pet-Guided Radiotherapy For Head and Neck Cancer
NCT01208883
Outcome Prediction in Head&Neck Cancer Patients After Radiotherapy
NCT01985984
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1.1. Introduction
Concurrent (chemo-) radiotherapy (CRT) is the current standard of care for patients with locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC). The proximity of important functional structures with the tumour makes treatment however highly complex. While locoregional control rates have improved over the last decade, treatment related toxicity can be severe with xerostomia and dysphagia gravely complicating the patient's quality of life.
Furthermore, it becomes increasingly clear that while these tumours can be identical in location and basic histology, their response to treatment differs greatly. This implies that for a subgroup of patients, equal locoregional control rates could be achieved using a less intense and consequently less toxic treatment schedule. This in contrast to the group of patients who develop a locoregional recurrence during follow up, for whom current treatment is apparently insufficient. These patients might benefit from a more intense treatment schedule, i.e. a higher dose of radiation.
These differences in sensitivity to treatment can be explained by variations in biological, molecular and genetic factors. Clinical parameters alone are insufficient for response prediction. Identifying the different molecular and genetic factors, would help us increase the accuracy of response prediction and based on these factors tailor the treatment more individually to each patient. Therefore we want to develop a prognostic and predictive model incorporating well-defined molecular and imaging parameters which show great promise in response prediction after ionizing radiation.
1.2. Genetic and molecular tumour characteristics
The first parameter we want to investigate further is tumour hypoxia. Hypoxia has been identified as a factor that increases tumour aggressiveness and decreases radiosensitivity. In the past, several techniques have been applied to detect biologically relevant tumour hypoxia, but none of them are used today in routine clinical practice. Recently, a polymerase chain reaction (PCR) -based hypoxia classifier gene signature was published by Toustrup et al. This classifier allows us to study biologically relevant tumour hypoxia and consequently tumour aggressiveness and resistance to ionizing irradiation. This analysis will be performed on biopsies obtained prior to treatment. Part of this biopsy material will also be stored into our biobank. This will facilitate future research on promising molecular and genetics parameters (such as HPV correlated overexpression of p16 for example) on a well-defined and structured patient database.
1.3. Imaging parameters
Aside from these important molecular and genetic tumour characteristics, several functional imaging parameters will also be included in our model. In contrast to anatomical imaging, functional imaging modalities provide us with a deeper insight in the tumour's underlying biological activity and microstructure.
Diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DWI) can characterize tissues based on the random displacement of water protons. This displacement can be quantified using the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC). Preliminary studies in HNSCC have demonstrated the prognostic and predictive potential of repetitive DWI early during and after treatment.
Dynamic contrast enhanced magnetic resonance imaging(DCE-MRI) is a second technique, which shows great promise as an early indicator of response to ionizing radiation. Many malignant tumors manifest neovascularity or angiogenesis. These processes are however flawed and as a result these newly synthesized vessels manifest a high permeability, tortuosity and generally a poor functionality. This might result in poor oxygen supply to the tumour cells, which may compromise the effectiveness of radiation treatment of the tumour. Therefore the vascular properties of a tumour, assessed with DCE-MRI, could prove a prognostic indicator of its aggressiveness.
2. STUDY OBJECTIVES
2.1. Primary objectives
The main objective of this study is to correlate clinical, molecular and radiological predictors with outcome, as defined by locoregional control and disease free survival. In this way we will develop a prognostic/predictive model. The predictive model will be instrumental in the individualization of treatment ensuring optimized treatment and avoiding under- and overtreatment.
2.2. Secondary objectives
* We want to get new insights in the tumor biology and microstructure by correlating imaging and molecular/genetic markers in a well-defined patient population.
* We want to validate the different imaging techniques.
* We want to make a correlation between hypoxia and other predictive biomarkers in the future, by storing the tissue obtained in this study in our biobank.
3. STUDY DESIGN
We propose to set up a study where we will prospectively include patients with locally advanced head and neck cancer who will be treated with concurrent chemoradiotherapy as decided after multidisciplinary consultation. An outline of the trial is presented in the figure below. All patients recognized eligible (non-metastatic locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, treated with chemoradiotherapy, karnofsky performance status ≥ 70% and ≥ 18 years old) will be included after written informed consent. Staging with a laryngoscopy, CT of the neck, MRI of the neck and a PET-CT will be routinely performed.
The CRT treatment consists of radiotherapy up to 72 Gy using an accelerated hyperfractionated schedule. Day 1 and day 22 of the treatment Cisplatin at 100mg/m² will be administered.
Tumour biopsies will be obtained a few days prior to treatment. The hypoxia gene expression profile will be derived from the tumour material (15 genes on PCR that can be analyzed individually or as a group through one binary variable).
The tissue used for RNA and DNA extraction needs to be flanked by H\&E staining confirming tumor presence. From the biopsy the two ends will be cut off and fixed in paraffin. This tissue will be stored in the biobank. The middle part of the tissue will be stored into RNA-later, and will be used in part to extract DNA and RNA. RNA will be used to synthesize cDNA to perform the qPCR analysis for the hypoxic classifier.
Patients will also undergo a DWI MRI and DCE imaging before and 3 weeks into CRT. Lesions will be quantitatively assessed by manual delineation of regions of interest (ROI) over the tumour on the native DWI and DCE-MRI images. ADC values and (semi-) quantitative DCE parameters will be calculated respectively.
All the above described data will be integrated into the prognostic model together with the available clinical data.
4. DEFINITION OF ENDPOINTS The main endpoint of this study is to validate the above described prognostic model. Using this prognostic model, we can predict response to treatment. This will help us to tailor the treatment more individually to each patient.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
OTHER
NONE
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
functional MRI
Functional MRI on day 22 of the chemoradiotherapy treatment. Parameters of these images will be later on correlated with outcome.
Hypoxia gene expression profile.
Tumour biopsies will be obtained as part of the staging procedure (standard). On this biopsies we will conduct a hypoxia gene expression profile (15 genes on PCR that can be analyzed individually or as a group through one binary variable). Hypoxia will be a parameter in our prognostic/predictive model.
Functional MRI before start of treatment.
As part of the standard staging procedure all patients will undergo an MRI of the neck. We will however also take DWI and DCE images at this time point. Parameters of these images will be later on correlated with outcome.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with non-metastatic locally advanced oropharyngeal cancer who will be treated with chemoradiotherapy, as decided after multidisciplinary consultation.
* A karnofsky performance status ≥ 70%
* Gender: Male - Female
* Informed consent obtained, signed and dated before specific protocol procedures
Exclusion Criteria
* Medical contraindications for any of the planned investigations
* Distant metastases
* Pregnant or lactating women
* Mental condition rendering the patient unable to understand the nature, scope, and possible consequences of the study
* Patient unlikely to comply with the protocol, i.e. uncooperative attitude, inability to return for follow-up visits, and unlikely to complete the study
18 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Flemish League Against Cancer
OTHER
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Sandra Nuyts
Full Professor, Clinical staff member
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Sandra Nuyts, PhD, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Universitaire Ziekenhuizen KU Leuven
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Departement of Radiation Oncology
Leuven, , Belgium
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
S54731
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.