Independent Exercise Compared With Formal Rehabilitation Following Primary Total Knee Replacement
NCT ID: NCT01826305
Last Updated: 2020-01-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
23 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2014-07-31
2015-10-23
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At enrollment, a baseline evaluation will be conducted to capture demographics, height, weight, primary diagnosis, medical comorbidities, and social supports as well as completion of the selected outcome measure, American Knee Society (AKS) Score, Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS). Secondary outcomes will include the measurement of health status with use of the Short Form-12v2 (SF-12v2) and activity level with the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score. At the twelve-week, six-month and twelve-month follow-up visits, the study subjects will complete the KOOS, SF-12v2, and UCLA Activity Score questionnaires. Statistical analysis will be performed to compare the outcomes between the two cohorts.
Hypothesis:
There will be no difference in outcomes between formal rehabilitation and independent exercises at twelve months after primary total knee replacement surgery using the American Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
A Comparison Of Primary TKA Rehabilitation Using A Smart Orthotic Versus Outpatient Physical Therapy
NCT04924205
Pre-operative Rehabilitation Exercise Program for Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT00493142
Comparison of Physiotherapy Versus Home Exercise Following Hip Replacement Surgery
NCT00175448
Does Rehabilitation After Total Knee Arthroplasty Work? - Feasibility Trial
NCT05935020
Risk of Serious Adverse Events Following Unsupervised vs Supervised Rehabilitation After Knee Arthroplasty
NCT07067060
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Informed consent will be received from patients who will participate in the study at the initial clinic visit and these patients will be randomized equally to either the PT/OT or independent exercise cohort using the REDCap website randomization feature. REDCap is a secure, web-based application for building and managing online surveys and databases that will be utilized for this study for data management. Patients that will be randomized to PT cohort will be prescribed formal therapy for twelve weeks with supervised exercises to regain knee strength and range of motion. Therapists will not be involved in the study design and therapists will not be informed that patients are participating in this study. The content, frequency, and duration of the rehabilitation program will be at the discretion of the treating therapist, consistent with usual practice.
The patients who will be in the independent exercises cohort will be registered on www.careforpatients.com, an online rehabilitation resource that provides computer aided rehabilitative exercises. Patients will follow a prepared 12-week protocol of exercises to perform postoperatively to gradually regain their knee strength and range of motion.
Post-operative weeks 0 - 1, the patients will perform three sets of ten repetitions everyday of: supine ankle pumps, supine heel slides, seated quad sets, supine glut sets, and supine hip abduction/adduction. The patient will also perform three sets of patella mobilization for one minute each and three sets of one repetition of supine knee extension.
Post-operative weeks 1 - 2, the patients will perform three sets of ten repetitions everyday of: supine heel slides, prone knee flexion, supine knee extension, supine SLR flexion, sidelying SLR abduction, prone SLR extension, sidelying SLR adduction. The patient will also perform three sets of patella mobilization for one minute each and three sets of one repetition of supine knee extension with weight.
Post-operative weeks 2 - 4, the patients will perform three sets of ten repetitions everyday of: standing knee extension, standing knee flexion, standing SLR flexion, standing SLR abduction, standing SLR extension, standing SLR adduction. The patient will also perform three sets of patella mobilization for one minute each, three sets of sitting hamstring stretch for thirty seconds each, prone quad stretch for thirty seconds each, and three sets of single leg stance for thirty seconds each.
Post-operative weeks 4 - 8, the patients will perform three sets of ten repetitions everyday of: bilateral mini squats, standing SLR flexion, standing SLR abduction, standing SLR extension, standing SLR adduction. The patient will also perform three sets of sitting hamstring stretch for thirty seconds each and prone quad stretch for thirty seconds each.
Post-operative weeks 8 - 12, the patients will perform three sets of ten repetitions everyday of: bilateral wall squats, forward step-ups, and side step-ups. The patient will also perform three sets of sitting hamstring stretch for thirty seconds each and prone quad stretch for thirty seconds each. Patients will be advised to perform these exercises as often as possible, but at least once a day.
All patients will have regularly scheduled follow-up visits per usual practice at six-weeks post-operatively, six-months post-operatively, and 12-months post-operatively where a physical exam will be performed to check the range of motion of the knee, gait, and lower leg muscle strength.
The primary outcome of the trial will be to evaluate the efficacy of formal therapy compared with independent exercises at twelve months after surgery with use of the American Knee Society (AKS) Knee Score. Secondary outcomes will include the Knee and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) the measurement of health status with use of the Short Form-12v2 (SF-12v2) and activity level with the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Activity Score.
At enrollment, a baseline evaluation will be conducted to capture demographics, height, weight, primary diagnosis, medical comorbidities, and social supports as well as completion of the selected outcome measures, AKS, KOOS, SF-12v2, and UCLA Activity Score. At the twelve-week, six-month and twelve-month follow-up visits, the study subjects will complete the AKS, KOOS, SF-12v2, and UCLA Activity Score questionnaires during their clinic visit or will be contacted by telephone or mail to complete the questionnaires if they do not have appointments for twelve-week, six-month or twelve-month follow-ups.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Formal Rehabilitation Therapy
Patients randomized to the formal rehabilitation therapy cohort will receive a prescription for therapy for twelve weeks following their primary knee replacement.
Formal Rehabilitation Therapy
Patients that will be randomized to the formal rehabilitation therapy cohort will be prescribed formal therapy for twelve weeks with supervised exercises to regain knee strength and range of motion. Therapists will not be involved in the study design and therapists will not be informed that patients are participating in this study. The content, frequency, and duration of the rehabilitation program will be at the discretion of the treating therapist, consistent with usual practice.
Independent Exercise Cohort
Patients randomized to the independent exercise cohort will receive online access to a twelve-week protocol of exercises to perform at home to strengthen and improve function of the replaced knee.
Independent Exercise Cohort
The patients who will be in the independent exercises cohort will be registered on www.careforpatients.com, an online rehabilitation resource that provides computer aided rehabilitative exercises. Patients will follow a prepared 12-week protocol of exercises to perform post-operatively to gradually regain their knee strength, flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Formal Rehabilitation Therapy
Patients that will be randomized to the formal rehabilitation therapy cohort will be prescribed formal therapy for twelve weeks with supervised exercises to regain knee strength and range of motion. Therapists will not be involved in the study design and therapists will not be informed that patients are participating in this study. The content, frequency, and duration of the rehabilitation program will be at the discretion of the treating therapist, consistent with usual practice.
Independent Exercise Cohort
The patients who will be in the independent exercises cohort will be registered on www.careforpatients.com, an online rehabilitation resource that provides computer aided rehabilitative exercises. Patients will follow a prepared 12-week protocol of exercises to perform post-operatively to gradually regain their knee strength, flexion, extension, abduction, and adduction.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* an age of eighteen years or older
* English speaking
* have a computer with access to the Internet
Exclusion Criteria
* patients not planning to return for follow up care
* patients relying on others for basic functioning
* do not speak English
* do not have a computer with access to the Internet
* prior physical therapy
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of California, San Francisco
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Kevin J. Bozic, MD, MBA
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of California, San Francisco
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University of California, San Francisco
San Francisco, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mahomed NN, Davis AM, Hawker G, Badley E, Davey JR, Syed KA, Coyte PC, Gandhi R, Wright JG. Inpatient compared with home-based rehabilitation following primary unilateral total hip or knee replacement: a randomized controlled trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Aug;90(8):1673-80. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.G.01108.
Khan F, Ng L, Gonzalez S, Hale T, Turner-Stokes L. Multidisciplinary rehabilitation programmes following joint replacement at the hip and knee in chronic arthropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Apr 16;2008(2):CD004957. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004957.pub3.
Shepperd S, Iliffe S. Hospital at home versus in-patient hospital care. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;(3):CD000356. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000356.pub2.
Mahomed NN, Koo Seen Lin MJ, Levesque J, Lan S, Bogoch ER. Determinants and outcomes of inpatient versus home based rehabilitation following elective hip and knee replacement. J Rheumatol. 2000 Jul;27(7):1753-8.
Shepperd S, Harwood D, Jenkinson C, Gray A, Vessey M, Morgan P. Randomised controlled trial comparing hospital at home care with inpatient hospital care. I: three month follow up of health outcomes. BMJ. 1998 Jun 13;316(7147):1786-91. doi: 10.1136/bmj.316.7147.1786.
Kurtz S, Ong K, Lau E, Mowat F, Halpern M. Projections of primary and revision hip and knee arthroplasty in the United States from 2005 to 2030. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Apr;89(4):780-5. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00222.
Dorr LD, Maheshwari AV, Long WT, Wan Z, Sirianni LE. Early pain relief and function after posterior minimally invasive and conventional total hip arthroplasty. A prospective, randomized, blinded study. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2007 Jun;89(6):1153-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.F.00940.
Munin MC, Rudy TE, Glynn NW, Crossett LS, Rubash HE. Early inpatient rehabilitation after elective hip and knee arthroplasty. JAMA. 1998 Mar 18;279(11):847-52. doi: 10.1001/jama.279.11.847.
Nilsdotter AK, Lohmander LS, Klassbo M, Roos EM. Hip disability and osteoarthritis outcome score (HOOS)--validity and responsiveness in total hip replacement. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2003 May 30;4:10. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-4-10. Epub 2003 May 30.
Roos EM, Toksvig-Larsen S. Knee injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) - validation and comparison to the WOMAC in total knee replacement. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2003 May 25;1:17. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-1-17.
Nilsdotter AK, Toksvig-Larsen S, Roos EM. A 5 year prospective study of patient-relevant outcomes after total knee replacement. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2009 May;17(5):601-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2008.11.007. Epub 2008 Nov 21.
Hurst NP, Ruta DA, Kind P. Comparison of the MOS short form-12 (SF12) health status questionnaire with the SF36 in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. Br J Rheumatol. 1998 Aug;37(8):862-9. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/37.8.862.
Terwee CB, Bouwmeester W, van Elsland SL, de Vet HC, Dekker J. Instruments to assess physical activity in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee: a systematic review of measurement properties. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011 Jun;19(6):620-33. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2011.01.002. Epub 2011 Jan 18.
Bellamy N, Buchanan WW, Goldsmith CH, Campbell J, Stitt LW. Validation study of WOMAC: a health status instrument for measuring clinically important patient relevant outcomes to antirheumatic drug therapy in patients with osteoarthritis of the hip or knee. J Rheumatol. 1988 Dec;15(12):1833-40.
Collins NJ, Misra D, Felson DT, Crossley KM, Roos EM. Measures of knee function: International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Subjective Knee Evaluation Form, Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS), Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Physical Function Short Form (KOOS-PS), Knee Outcome Survey Activities of Daily Living Scale (KOS-ADL), Lysholm Knee Scoring Scale, Oxford Knee Score (OKS), Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), Activity Rating Scale (ARS), and Tegner Activity Score (TAS). Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken). 2011 Nov;63 Suppl 11(0 11):S208-28. doi: 10.1002/acr.20632. No abstract available.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-09642
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.