Veterans Individual Placement and Support Towards Advancing Recovery
NCT ID: NCT01817712
Last Updated: 2019-02-19
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
541 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-12-31
2017-02-03
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
12/14/12: Analytic plan augmented to allow for a sensitivity analysis of the primary outcome that would exclude the first 12 weeks post-randomization, and evaluate between group proportion of steady worker status, as defined by working in a competitive job for greater than or equal to 50% of the weeks during week 13-78.
7/1/13: Analysis plan has been augmented to include a logistic regression analysis of the primary outcome, adjusted for participating medical center.
10/4/13: Addition of the IPS-25 Fidelity Scale. The addition of the IPS-25 scale should increase the validity of study results.
1/15/15: Addition of an Interactive Voice Recognition/Web-based (IVR/Web) System; as an option for weekly data capture of the primary outcome data (employment history).
8/17/15: Approval of Supplemental Data Collection at Participant Study Exit; use of the data collected will supplement the study analysis plan and, provide further insight into the impact of vocational rehab. A Participant Satisfaction Survey will allow study participants to indicate their level of satisfaction with the study, vocational rehabilitation intervention and, suggestions for future research.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
The Impact of Vocational Rehabilitation on Mentally III Veterans
NCT00333801
Impact of Supported Employment Versus Standard Vocational Rehabilitation in Veterans With Post-traumatic Stress Disorder
NCT00728325
Self-Help Intervention for Post 9/11 Veterans With Depression or PTSD Symptoms
NCT07202325
Safety Aid Reduction Treatment for PTSD Among Veterans
NCT04515784
Evaluating a Telehealth Treatment for Veterans With Hepatitis C and PTSD
NCT00333710
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Over the past two decades of studies, the Individual Placement and Support (IPS) model of Supported Employment has yielded remarkably robust and consistent employment outcomes for individuals with serious mental illness (defined as schizophrenia, schizoaffective disorder, bipolar disorder, and major depression with psychotic features). Overall, approximately two-thirds of participants in clinical trials with serious mental illness who received IPS achieved competitive employment. However, Veterans with PTSD have very different clinical characteristics and employment challenges compared to Veterans with SMI. Serving as the first study in a PTSD population, a recent single site pilot study found superior outcomes from IPS compared to the conventional VA vocational rehabilitation program (VRP) in unemployed Veterans with PTSD (n=85). During the 12-month study follow-up period, 76% of the Veterans with PTSD randomized to IPS gained competitive employment, compared to 28% of those randomized to VRP. Together with the evidence base accumulated in the serious mentally ill population, the positive results of the pilot study in PTSD support a VA Cooperative Study to definitively test the effectiveness of IPS in Veterans with PTSD.
As the primary outcome, the two groups will be compared in terms of the proportion of study participants who met the definition of steady worker, i.e., hold competitive employment for at least 50% of the follow-up period. Competitive employment is defined as a job receiving regular wages in a setting that is not set aside, sheltered, or enclaved, that is, the same job could be held by people without a mental illness or disability and is not a set-aside job in the TWP program. Secondary outcomes will include change in other occupational outcomes, PTSD symptoms, self esteem, community integration, and quality of life. We will explore the differences between groups in terms of occurrences of negative health outcomes.
These findings would provide generalizable evidence of the effectiveness of differing employment support to the VHA stakeholders who inform policy and service delivery for Veterans with PTSD. Given the number of Veterans with PTSD, it is of critical importance for the VA to offer employment service programs based on the best evidence-based recovery-oriented model for this group. Conducting a large multi-site study is the next logical step in confirming IPS as an evidence-based employment service for Veterans with PTSD.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Individual Placement and Support (IPS)
The IPS intervention must achieve a rating of \>66 of a possible 75 points on the Supported Employment Fidelity Scale. The fidelity ratings are conducted by the National IPS Fidelity Monitor at biannual on-site monitoring visits.
Individual Placement & Support
IPS uses an integrated "place-train" approach to help people obtain and maintain community-based competitive employment in their chosen occupation.
VA Transitional Work Program (TWP)
TWP will adhere to a lower rating (less than or equal to 55 of a possible 75 points) on the Supported Employment Fidelity Scale rated by the National Fidelity Monitor. The TWP specialist participates in face-to-face supervision with the local Compensated Work Therapy (CWT) team according to the CWT manager's schedule.
VA Transitional Work Program
The long-standing approach to vocational rehabilitation in VHA and state programs is the "train-place" or "stepwise" model that is founded on the assumption that the patient or client benefits from some form of pre-vocational training, instruction, or practice in a protected, but artificial, work setting prior to entering or being placed in a competitive work role.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Individual Placement & Support
IPS uses an integrated "place-train" approach to help people obtain and maintain community-based competitive employment in their chosen occupation.
VA Transitional Work Program
The long-standing approach to vocational rehabilitation in VHA and state programs is the "train-place" or "stepwise" model that is founded on the assumption that the patient or client benefits from some form of pre-vocational training, instruction, or practice in a protected, but artificial, work setting prior to entering or being placed in a competitive work role.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age greater than or equal to 18\* (\*18 or 19 depending on state legal definition of a minor) to age 65
* Eligible for VA TWP services
* Diagnosis of PTSD, as confirmed by Clinician Administered PTSD Scale (CAPS)
* Currently unemployed (and not participating in TWP - Impact Statement #3 10/4/13)
* Expression of interest in competitive employment (part-time or full-time - Impact Statement #3 10/4/13)
* Willing and able to give informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Diagnosis of dementia or severe cognitive disorder (evidenced in the medical record)
* Unlikely that participant can complete the study; reasons may include: expected deployment, expected incarceration, expected long-term hospitalization, or expected relocation from the vicinity of the participating medical center (PMC) during the study period
* Active suicidal or homicidal ideation
* Current participation in another interventional trial
18 Years
65 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Office of Research and Development
FED
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Lori Lynne Davis, MD AB
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Birmingham VA Medical Center, Birmingham, AL
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Tuscaloosa VA Medical Center, Tuscaloosa, AL
Tuscaloosa, Alabama, United States
San Francisco VA Medical Center, San Francisco, CA
San Francisco, California, United States
Miami VA Healthcare System, Miami, FL
Miami, Florida, United States
Edward Hines Jr. VA Hospital, Hines, IL
Hines, Illinois, United States
Minneapolis VA Health Care System, Minneapolis, MN
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
New Mexico VA Health Care System, Albuquerque, NM
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
James J. Peters VA Medical Center, Bronx, NY
The Bronx, New York, United States
Durham VA Medical Center, Durham, NC
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Ralph H. Johnson VA Medical Center, Charleston, SC
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
VA North Texas Health Care System Dallas VA Medical Center, Dallas, TX
Dallas, Texas, United States
Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, TX
Houston, Texas, United States
William S. Middleton Memorial Veterans Hospital, Madison, WI
Madison, Wisconsin, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Davis LL, Resnick SG, Maieritsch KP, Weber KC, Erbes CR, Strom TQ, McCall KP, Kyriakides TC. Employment outcomes from VA vocational services involving transitional work for veterans with a diagnosis of posttraumatic stress disorder. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Sep;42(3):257-267. doi: 10.1037/prj0000357. Epub 2019 Apr 4.
Mueller L, Wolfe WR, Neylan TC, McCaslin SE, Yehuda R, Flory JD, Kyriakides TC, Toscano R, Davis LL. Positive impact of IPS supported employment on PTSD-related occupational-psychosocial functional outcomes: Results from a VA randomized-controlled trial. Psychiatr Rehabil J. 2019 Sep;42(3):246-256. doi: 10.1037/prj0000345. Epub 2019 Apr 1.
Davis LL, Kyriakides TC, Suris AM, Ottomanelli LA, Mueller L, Parker PE, Resnick SG, Toscano R, Scrymgeour AA, Drake RE; VA CSP #589 Veterans Individual Placement and Support Toward Advancing Recovery Investigators. Effect of Evidence-Based Supported Employment vs Transitional Work on Achieving Steady Work Among Veterans With Posttraumatic Stress Disorder: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 1;75(4):316-324. doi: 10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2017.4472.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
589
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.