Corifollitropin Alfa Followed by Menotropin for Poor Ovarian Responders Trial

NCT ID: NCT01816321

Last Updated: 2016-06-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

150 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2016-05-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In combination with the existing literature, previous work indicates that 1) women with poor ovarian response fulfilling the "Bologna criteria" have very low pregnancy rates, irrespective of age 2) current treatment protocols demonstrate ongoing pregnancy rates that do not exceed 8.5% and 3) corifollitropin alfa followed by hpHMG might increase ongoing pregnancy rates in young patients (\<40years old) fulfilling the criteria. These findings provide a strong rationale for a definitive large RCT. The COMPORT study will provide conclusive evidence regarding the superiority or not of this novel protocol with corifollitropin alfa followed by hpHMG for the treatment of young poor ovarian responders fulfilling the Bologna criteria.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Recently, the European Society of Human Reproduction and Embryology developed a new definition in order to select patients suitable for inclusion in future clinical trials as poor ovarian responders, the so-called "Bologna criteria". However, a limited number of studies has been published to date including patients with poor ovarian response according to the "Bologna criteria", whereas no randomized trial is published or ongoing for this population.

Preliminary reports in "Bologna poor responders" highlight the limited prospects for these women. Natural cycle IVF has been shown to result in disappointingly low live birth rates, regardless of patients' age and ovarian stimulation with widely accepted treatment modalities, e.g. short agonist protocol, did not appear demonstrate substantial benefits.

Nonetheless, despite the disappointing results from the vast majority of the preliminary studies in this population, a recent pilot study by our group has shown that a specific protocol may indeed be a promising option for women of younger age fulfilling the "Bologna criteria". Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified hMG in an antagonist protocol demonstrated an ongoing pregnancy rate of 28% in women \<40years, strongly suggesting the conduction of a future randomized trial testing this novel treatment protocol

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Infertility Poor Ovarian Response

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Corifollitropin alfa followed by hpHMG

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Corifollitropin alfa

Intervention Type DRUG

Corifollitropin alfa 150μg on day 2 of the menstrual cycle (stimulation day 1)

Ganirelix

Intervention Type DRUG

Ganirelix 0.25mg/daily from day 7 of the cycle(stimulation day 6) until day of ovulation triggering

hp HMG

Intervention Type DRUG

hp HMG 300IU/daily from day 9 of the cycle (stimulation day 8)until day of ovulation triggering

recombinant FSH

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

recombinant FSH

Intervention Type DRUG

recombinant FSH 300IU/daily from day 2 of the cycle (stimulation day 8)until day of ovulation triggering

Ganirelix

Intervention Type DRUG

Ganirelix 0.25mg/daily from day 7 of the cycle(stimulation day 6) until day of ovulation triggering

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Corifollitropin alfa

Corifollitropin alfa 150μg on day 2 of the menstrual cycle (stimulation day 1)

Intervention Type DRUG

recombinant FSH

recombinant FSH 300IU/daily from day 2 of the cycle (stimulation day 8)until day of ovulation triggering

Intervention Type DRUG

Ganirelix

Ganirelix 0.25mg/daily from day 7 of the cycle(stimulation day 6) until day of ovulation triggering

Intervention Type DRUG

hp HMG

hp HMG 300IU/daily from day 9 of the cycle (stimulation day 8)until day of ovulation triggering

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age less than 40 years
* Fulfillment of the "Bologna criteria" for poor ovarian response.


1. Women \< 40 years old AND ≤3 oocytes in one of the previous cycles AND (Antral follicle count \<7 or antimullerian hormone serum values \<1.1 ng/ml)
2. Women \<40 years old and ≤3 oocytes in two the previous cycles with maximum ovarian stimulation

In addition women less than 40 years old will be considered eligible if they had undergone previous ovarian surgery or chemotherapy (risk factors for poor ovarian response) and have an AMH\<1.1ng/ml or an AFC\<7, as suggested by the Bologna criteria

Exclusion Criteria

* Uterine abnormalities
* Recent history of any current untreated endocrine abnormality
* Unilateral or bilateral hydrosalpinx (visible on transvaginal ultrasound, unless clipped)
* Contraindications for the use of gonadotropins
* Recent history of severe disease requiring regular treatment
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

39 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Medicine and Pharmacy at Ho Chi Minh City

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Nikolaos P. Polyzos

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Nikolaos P Polyzos, MD PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

University of Medicine and Pharmacy of Ho Chi Minh City

Ho Chi Minh City, , Vietnam

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Belgium Vietnam

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Polyzos NP, De Vos M, Corona R, Vloeberghs V, Ortega-Hrepich C, Stoop D, Tournaye H. Addition of highly purified HMG after corifollitropin alfa in antagonist-treated poor ovarian responders: a pilot study. Hum Reprod. 2013 May;28(5):1254-60. doi: 10.1093/humrep/det045. Epub 2013 Feb 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23442756 (View on PubMed)

Polyzos NP, Devos M, Humaidan P, Stoop D, Ortega-Hrepich C, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Corifollitropin alfa followed by rFSH in a GnRH antagonist protocol for poor ovarian responder patients: an observational pilot study. Fertil Steril. 2013 Feb;99(2):422-6. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2012.09.043. Epub 2012 Oct 16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 23084565 (View on PubMed)

Polyzos NP, Blockeel C, Verpoest W, De Vos M, Stoop D, Vloeberghs V, Camus M, Devroey P, Tournaye H. Live birth rates following natural cycle IVF in women with poor ovarian response according to the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2012 Dec;27(12):3481-6. doi: 10.1093/humrep/des318. Epub 2012 Aug 30.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22940767 (View on PubMed)

Polyzos NP, Devroey P. A systematic review of randomized trials for the treatment of poor ovarian responders: is there any light at the end of the tunnel? Fertil Steril. 2011 Nov;96(5):1058-61.e7. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.09.048.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22036048 (View on PubMed)

Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L; ESHRE working group on Poor Ovarian Response Definition. ESHRE consensus on the definition of 'poor response' to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011 Jul;26(7):1616-24. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der092. Epub 2011 Apr 19.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21505041 (View on PubMed)

Drakopoulos P, Vuong TNL, Ho NAV, Vaiarelli A, Ho MT, Blockeel C, Camus M, Lam AT, van de Vijver A, Humaidan P, Tournaye H, Polyzos NP. Corifollitropin alfa followed by highly purified HMG versus recombinant FSH in young poor ovarian responders: a multicentre randomized controlled clinical trial. Hum Reprod. 2017 Nov 1;32(11):2225-2233. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dex296.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29040589 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2013-000583-29

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

143201316398

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.