Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-01-31
2012-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective- D-Mannose is a sugar, it sticks to E. coli bacteria, the aim of the study was to evaluate its efficacy in the treatment and prophylaxis of recurrent UTIs.
Design, setting and participants- : In this crossover trial female patient were eligible for the study if they had recurrent UTIs, that is three ore more episodes during the preceding 12 months. Suitable patients were randomly assigned to antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or to a regimen of oral D Mannose for 24 weeks, and received the other intervention in the second phase of the study.
Outcome measurements and statistical analysis- The time to recurrence of UTI, bladder pain (VAS p) and urinary urgency (VAS u) were evaluated at the end of antibiotic therapy and at the and of 24 weeks fo D Mannose. The results for quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD as they were all normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). T-test for paired data was used to analyze differences of time of recurrence, VAS pain, Vas urgency and number of voidings between treatment. Data analysis was performed with STATA statistical package (release 11,1, 2010, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
D Mannose for Prevention and Treatment of RUTIs
NCT03790254
Preventing Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections With α-D-mannose
NCT03497598
A Trial of D-mannose for the Prophylaxis of Recurrent Urinary Tract Infections
NCT06940622
A Clinical Trial to Investigate the Safety and Efficacy of D-Mannose on Symptoms of Urinary Tract Infection in Women
NCT06719115
Nutraceutical Efficacy for rUTI
NCT03395288
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
PATIENTS AND METHODS Suitable female patients with recurrent urinary tract infections who were visited at the outpatient Clinic of our Urology Department were eligible for study. The work has been conducted in accordance with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki of World Medical Association. Patients were enrolled in the study after treatment for the most recent urinary tract infection if they had positive urinary cultures at that time.
Each participant entering the trial was assigned to one of the following treatments in a random sequence:
1. A regimen of five-day antibiotic therapy with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole 160 mg/800 mg twice a day. Then 1 week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
2. A regimen of oral D Mannose 1 gr. 3 times a day, every 8 hours for 2 weeks, and subsequently 1 gr. twice a day for 22 weeks. D-Mannose has the best activity when urine has neutral pH, therefore patients were instructed to measure urinary pH using dipsticks and use oral sodium bicarbonate 250 mg b.i.d.or potassium citrate 1 gr. b.i.d. as alkalinizing agents if pH was \<7.
Patients were randomly assigned to antibiotic treatment with trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole or to a regimen of oral D Mannose for 24 weeks, and received the other intervention in the second phase of the study.
VAS score for bladder pain (VASp) and for urgency (VASu) was evaluated before starting D Mannose and at 24 weeks. The 24 hour number of voidings was obtained filling a voiding diary before and at the end of treatment with D Mannose. Cure was defined as the resolution of symptoms and no post-treatment bacteriuria at the 24 week follow-up visit. Cure with recurrence was defined as having resolution of symptoms with negative cultures at 12 week followed by significant UTI with bacteriuria before 24 weeks. Failure was defined as having persistent symptoms and significant bacteriuria before 24 weeks. The cure rate was determined for patients who met infection criteria, returned for the follow-up visits and had been treated with an antimicrobial for recurrent urinary tract infection occurring twice or more times during the 6 months preceding the 24 weeks course of daily oral D Mannose. The time to recurrence of UTI, VAS pain and VAS urgency were evaluated at the end of antibiotic therapy and at the end of 24 week treatment with oral D Mannose. Statistical Analysis- The results for quantitative variables were expressed as mean values and SD as they were all normally distributed (Shapiro-Wilk test). T-test for paired data was used to analyze differences of time of recurrence, VAS pain, Vas urgency and number of voidings between treatment. Data analysis was performed with STATA statistical package (release 11,1, 2010, Stata Corporation, College Station, Texas, USA).
DISCUSSION- The approach in the management of recurrent urinary tract infections is usually to treat adequately an episode of infection and after the completion should document complete eradication with a urine culture; if infection reoccurs or persists then imaging is required. In the management of recurrent UTIs in women it is a common practice to fight the resistance of the bacterium E. coli by varying the type of antibiotics, or increasing the dose and duration of therapy. However, in doing so the bacteria become even more resistant to broad spectrum antibiotics. Moreover, the resistance of the bacterium would not increase if the infection was due to a new E. coli contamination of the faeces or to sexual contact. What actually appears to occur is the survival of a part of the old colony of bacteria in the urinary tract, they remain latent and are reactivated by various favourable conditions, the relentless recurrences are therefore not considered as reinfection. It could be learnt a lot from patients and from research done on the causes of repeated urinary tract infections, especially due to the bacterium E. coli. Uropathogenic Escherichia coli (UPEC) strains may contain virulence factors that allow the bacteria to penetrate into the transitional cells and form quiescent intracellular reservoirs (QIRs). Establishment of QIRs throughout the underlying transitional epithelium may predispose an individual to an increased likelihood of recurrence and may account for some of the frequent same-strain recurrences that are seen clinically despite appropriate antibiotic therapy. A difficult aspect of treating urinary tract infections in women is the high likelihood of recurrence. In a series of trials a group of susceptible women averaged 2.6 infections per patient per year despite the apparent effectiveness of short-term therapy. While long-term prophylaxis was relatively effective in that series, resistance to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole by urinary pathogens increased to 19% in a 5-year period. Although there is debate regarding the duration of antibiotic therapy, emergence of drug-resistant organisms has to be considered with prolonged antibiotic use, even in healthy women with uncomplicated UTIs. A number of triggers lead to the reactivation of dormant E.coli already in the bladder, or the release of E.coli pods from behind biofilms in the bladder. When a first UTI is caused by E. coli, the risk of a second infection within 6 months is greater than when a first infection is cause by another uropathogen. Although E. coli was the most frequently isolated microorganism in our group of patients, the limited number of patients studied could not confirm this assumption. The chemical structure of D-Mannose causes it to stick to E. coli bacteria, maybe even more tenaciously than E. coli adheres to human cells. Although the mechanism of how it works is complicated, theoretically, if enough D-mannose is present in the urine, it binds to the bacteria and prevents them from attaching to the urinary tract lining. Our clinical experience shows that D Mannose represents a useful choice to address the problem of recurrent UTIs. The time required to develop a new infection, or for the re-emergence of the bacterial reservoir, as can be assumed from new data, is significantly longer with a prolonged course of oral D Mannose than with antibiotic treatment, even when these are used for long periods at a low dose, or in cycles. We actually know mannose has no bactericidal properties, and it might well be that the dosage and duration of therapy have to be individualized according to bacterial growth and replication speed in the bladder and urinary tract. The major part of mannose ingested is eliminated with urine and works by binding to bacteria concentrated in infected urine and attempting to perpetuate infection by binding to mannose receptors of urothelial bladder cells, this mechanism being the one involved in most cases of recurrences. In most cases recurrences are wrongly regarded as re-infections: it is highly likely that bactericidal molecules not possessing the same properties cannot produce the same consistent effect, that is the elimination of more and more loads of bacteria with urine, "alive" albeit inactivated, motionless, devoid of pathogenic potential due to mannose linked to them.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
D Mannose
1 gr. every 8 hours for 2 weeks, subsequently 1 gr. every 12 hours for 22 weeks
D Mannose
1 gr. every 8 hours
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
one cp b.i.d. for 5 days. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
intervention was a 5-days course of trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole cp 160 mg/800 mg twice a day. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
D Mannose
1 gr. every 8 hours
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
one cp b.i.d. for 5 days. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
D Mannose
1 gr. every 8 hours
trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole
one cp b.i.d. for 5 days. Then one week of antibiotic every 4 weeks for the following 23 weeks
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* 3 or more culture documented urinary tract infections in the preceding 12 months
* Patients who had not taken antimicrobials within 4 weeks and were not pregnant or contemplating pregnancy.
Exclusion Criteria
22 Years
75 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo di Pavia
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Daniele Porru
Consultant Urologist, Principal investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Daniele Porru, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Urology Dept. Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo Pavia
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Urology Department Fondazione IRCCS Policlinico San Matteo
Pavia, , Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Mulvey MA, Lopez-Boado YS, Wilson CL, Roth R, Parks WC, Heuser J, Hultgren SJ. Induction and evasion of host defenses by type 1-piliated uropathogenic Escherichia coli. Science. 1998 Nov 20;282(5393):1494-7. doi: 10.1126/science.282.5393.1494.
Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Hultgren SJ. Establishment of a persistent Escherichia coli reservoir during the acute phase of a bladder infection. Infect Immun. 2001 Jul;69(7):4572-9. doi: 10.1128/IAI.69.7.4572-4579.2001.
Mulvey MA, Schilling JD, Martinez JJ, Hultgren SJ. Bad bugs and beleaguered bladders: interplay between uropathogenic Escherichia coli and innate host defenses. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2000 Aug 1;97(16):8829-35. doi: 10.1073/pnas.97.16.8829.
Cooper TE, Teng C, Howell M, Teixeira-Pinto A, Jaure A, Wong G. D-mannose for preventing and treating urinary tract infections. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 30;8(8):CD013608. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013608.pub2.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
related reference
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
DMannose UTIs
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.