Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE3
46 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Steroid Injection for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome
NCT00863889
Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome: Efficacy of Ultrasound Guided Platelet-rich Plasma vs Needle Tenotomy.
NCT04231357
Platelet Rich Plasma Versus Placebo for the Treatment of Greater Trochanteric Pain Syndrome (HiPPO Trial)
NCT03479190
Study to Assess the Safety and Efficacy of FX006 Administered to Patients With Greater Trochanteric Bursitis
NCT04182672
Gonyautoxins Local Periarticular Injection for Pain Management After Total Knee Arthroplasty
NCT03025594
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The prevalence of GTPS amongst adult patients referred to a spine clinic for chronic low back pain (LBP) has been reported to be 20-35%. In addition to pain, GTPS induces functional disability which at times may profoundly interfere with patients' daily activities. The diagnosis of GTPS is suspected in a patient complaining of lateral hip pain. The reproduction of typical pain on palpation of the posterior part of the greater trochanter is the only well recognised clinical sign, although other clinical signs have been described. As is frequently the case with these type of syndromes, the physiopathology of GTPS is probably a mixture of several musculoskeletal problems, among which trochanteric bursitis and gluteus medius (GMe) tendinosis are the most frequently cited.
MRI studies have demonstrated GMe tendinosis or tears in patients with GTPS and MRI is used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of GTPS in many studies. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) is of increasing interest among rheumatologists. It readily demonstrates soft tissue lesions, fluid collections, allows dynamic examination and the undertaking of ultrasound guided procedures. GMe and gluteus minus (GMi) tendinopathy or tears as well as bursitis can be clearly demonstrated by ultrasound and US may guide steroid injection for the treatment of GMe tendinopathy. However, to date no study has compared the utility of MRI compared to US.
There are very few well-performed studies regarding the treatment of GTPS. Although poorly studied, analgesics and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used as first line therapy. The duration of therapy required with these oral agents is unknown and there are significant potential side-effects from these treatments. The vast majority of patients referred to secondary or tertiary centres have failed these oral therapies. Some authors advocate physiotherapy (massage or stretching) but once again, there is no strong evidence to support this approach. Thus, most patients are treated with an injection of a combination of steroids and local anaesthetic. However, there is no convincing evidence in the literature that this practice is effective.
The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) has been shown to improve the accuracy of corticosteroid injections for many joints and extra-articular structures such as bursa and tendon sheaths. Although small observational studies have suggested that local corticosteroid injection may be effective in the short term, no prospective controlled study has been carried out to establish the efficacy of this common intervention.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
DOUBLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
rapidocain and bethametsaone
Rapidocain and Bethametsaone :
Lidocaine (Rapidocain(R)): 4ml of 1% Lidocaine Bethametasone (Diprophos): 1ml ampoule (containing 5mg/ml dipropionate de bétaméthasone and 2mg/ml phosphate disodique de bétaméthasone)
rapidocain and bethametsaone
lidocaine (Rapidocain(R)): 4ml of 1% Lidocaine
bethametasone (Diprophos): 1ml ampoule (containing 5mg/ml dipropionate de betamethasone and 2mg/ml phosphate disodique de betamethasone)
sterile saline
Placebo arm with 5ml of sterile saline (NaCl) solution
sterile saline
Placebo = 5ml of sterile saline solution
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
rapidocain and bethametsaone
lidocaine (Rapidocain(R)): 4ml of 1% Lidocaine
bethametasone (Diprophos): 1ml ampoule (containing 5mg/ml dipropionate de betamethasone and 2mg/ml phosphate disodique de betamethasone)
sterile saline
Placebo = 5ml of sterile saline solution
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. NRS lateral hip pain score ≥ 4 in the preceding week.
3. Failure of another "standard" treatment:
* Physiotherapy: local therapy or a stretching program, or
* Analgesic treatment (minimum of 5 days of consecutive therapy, including, but not limited to, NSAIDs).
4. Typical lateral hip pain reproduced by palpation of the greater trochanter
Exclusion Criteria
2. Concomitant local surgical intervention for tumours, infection or fracture, based on clinical history and physical examination
3. Previous ipsilateral prosthetic hip surgery
4. Scheduled ipsilateral hip surgery within 3 months
5. Fibromyalgia (diagnosis established by a rheumatologist)
6. Flair of chronic inflammatory joint disease (as defined by a rheumatologist)
7. Skin lesions at the injection site
8. Allergy to one of the studied drugs
9. Anticoagulation with internal normalized ration (INR) \>3
10. Blood coagulation disorder, such as haemophilia.
11. Serious and uncontrolled psychiatric disease (as assessed by the clinician as a contraindication for steroid)
12. Other contraindications to steroid use, such as:
* uncontrolled diabetes (non-fasting blood glucose \> 10 mmol/L)
* unstable hypertension (systolic pressure \> 160mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 100mmHg), or
* open or closed angle glaucoma.
13. Requirement for systemic steroids (including steroid injections) or dose modification of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs during the preceding three months. Oral corticosteroids (\< 10mg / day of Prednisone or equivalent) will be permitted providing that the dose has been stable for 4 weeks prior to inclusion and that the patient is expected to remain on the baseline dose for the duration of the study.
14. Presence of a pacemaker or other metallic object that constitutes a CI to MRI, or severe claustrophobia
15. Pregnant women (according to a pregnancy test) or nursing (breastfeeding) mothers.
16. Unwillingness or inability to give informed consent.
17. Unavailability for follow-up
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospital, Geneva
OTHER
Stephane Genevay
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Stephane Genevay
Médecin adjoint
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Stephane Genevay, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University Hospital, Geneva
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital, Geneva
Geneva, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CE 10-213
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.