Local Injection Under US Control in GTPS.

NCT ID: NCT01807962

Last Updated: 2017-06-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

46 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2011-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

We hypothesize that local ultrasound guided injection with corticosteroid and local anaesthetic are effective on the symptoms of GTPS.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The greater trochanteric pain syndrome (GTPS) is a frequent soft tissue syndrome which is often not recognised by medical practitioners. Currently, there is no validated definition of this syndrome and it is classically defined as pain and tenderness in the region of the greater trochanter that may radiate down to the postero-lateral aspect of the thigh and may mimic nerve root compression.

The prevalence of GTPS amongst adult patients referred to a spine clinic for chronic low back pain (LBP) has been reported to be 20-35%. In addition to pain, GTPS induces functional disability which at times may profoundly interfere with patients' daily activities. The diagnosis of GTPS is suspected in a patient complaining of lateral hip pain. The reproduction of typical pain on palpation of the posterior part of the greater trochanter is the only well recognised clinical sign, although other clinical signs have been described. As is frequently the case with these type of syndromes, the physiopathology of GTPS is probably a mixture of several musculoskeletal problems, among which trochanteric bursitis and gluteus medius (GMe) tendinosis are the most frequently cited.

MRI studies have demonstrated GMe tendinosis or tears in patients with GTPS and MRI is used as the gold standard for the diagnosis of GTPS in many studies. Musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) is of increasing interest among rheumatologists. It readily demonstrates soft tissue lesions, fluid collections, allows dynamic examination and the undertaking of ultrasound guided procedures. GMe and gluteus minus (GMi) tendinopathy or tears as well as bursitis can be clearly demonstrated by ultrasound and US may guide steroid injection for the treatment of GMe tendinopathy. However, to date no study has compared the utility of MRI compared to US.

There are very few well-performed studies regarding the treatment of GTPS. Although poorly studied, analgesics and non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) are often used as first line therapy. The duration of therapy required with these oral agents is unknown and there are significant potential side-effects from these treatments. The vast majority of patients referred to secondary or tertiary centres have failed these oral therapies. Some authors advocate physiotherapy (massage or stretching) but once again, there is no strong evidence to support this approach. Thus, most patients are treated with an injection of a combination of steroids and local anaesthetic. However, there is no convincing evidence in the literature that this practice is effective.

The use of musculoskeletal ultrasound (US) has been shown to improve the accuracy of corticosteroid injections for many joints and extra-articular structures such as bursa and tendon sheaths. Although small observational studies have suggested that local corticosteroid injection may be effective in the short term, no prospective controlled study has been carried out to establish the efficacy of this common intervention.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Periarthritis Bursitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

rapidocain and bethametsaone

Rapidocain and Bethametsaone :

Lidocaine (Rapidocain(R)): 4ml of 1% Lidocaine Bethametasone (Diprophos): 1ml ampoule (containing 5mg/ml dipropionate de bétaméthasone and 2mg/ml phosphate disodique de bétaméthasone)

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

rapidocain and bethametsaone

Intervention Type DRUG

lidocaine (Rapidocain(R)): 4ml of 1% Lidocaine

bethametasone (Diprophos): 1ml ampoule (containing 5mg/ml dipropionate de betamethasone and 2mg/ml phosphate disodique de betamethasone)

sterile saline

Placebo arm with 5ml of sterile saline (NaCl) solution

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

sterile saline

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo = 5ml of sterile saline solution

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rapidocain and bethametsaone

lidocaine (Rapidocain(R)): 4ml of 1% Lidocaine

bethametasone (Diprophos): 1ml ampoule (containing 5mg/ml dipropionate de betamethasone and 2mg/ml phosphate disodique de betamethasone)

Intervention Type DRUG

sterile saline

Placebo = 5ml of sterile saline solution

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

diprophos lidocaine NaCl

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients complaining of lateral hip pain for more than 1 month.
2. NRS lateral hip pain score ≥ 4 in the preceding week.
3. Failure of another "standard" treatment:

* Physiotherapy: local therapy or a stretching program, or
* Analgesic treatment (minimum of 5 days of consecutive therapy, including, but not limited to, NSAIDs).
4. Typical lateral hip pain reproduced by palpation of the greater trochanter

Exclusion Criteria

1. Age younger than 18 years old
2. Concomitant local surgical intervention for tumours, infection or fracture, based on clinical history and physical examination
3. Previous ipsilateral prosthetic hip surgery
4. Scheduled ipsilateral hip surgery within 3 months
5. Fibromyalgia (diagnosis established by a rheumatologist)
6. Flair of chronic inflammatory joint disease (as defined by a rheumatologist)
7. Skin lesions at the injection site
8. Allergy to one of the studied drugs
9. Anticoagulation with internal normalized ration (INR) \>3
10. Blood coagulation disorder, such as haemophilia.
11. Serious and uncontrolled psychiatric disease (as assessed by the clinician as a contraindication for steroid)
12. Other contraindications to steroid use, such as:

* uncontrolled diabetes (non-fasting blood glucose \> 10 mmol/L)
* unstable hypertension (systolic pressure \> 160mmHg or diastolic pressure \> 100mmHg), or
* open or closed angle glaucoma.
13. Requirement for systemic steroids (including steroid injections) or dose modification of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs during the preceding three months. Oral corticosteroids (\< 10mg / day of Prednisone or equivalent) will be permitted providing that the dose has been stable for 4 weeks prior to inclusion and that the patient is expected to remain on the baseline dose for the duration of the study.
14. Presence of a pacemaker or other metallic object that constitutes a CI to MRI, or severe claustrophobia
15. Pregnant women (according to a pregnancy test) or nursing (breastfeeding) mothers.
16. Unwillingness or inability to give informed consent.
17. Unavailability for follow-up
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University Hospital, Geneva

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Stephane Genevay

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Stephane Genevay

Médecin adjoint

Responsibility Role SPONSOR_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Stephane Genevay, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University Hospital, Geneva

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Hospital, Geneva

Geneva, , Switzerland

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Switzerland

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

CE 10-213

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ALGRX 4975 After Total Knee Replacement
NCT00132392 COMPLETED PHASE2
Bunionectomy Trial With GRT6005
NCT00872885 COMPLETED PHASE2