Placebo-Controlled Study to Evaluate the Safety and Efficacy of OPN-305 in Preventing Delayed Renal Graft Function

NCT ID: NCT01794663

Last Updated: 2017-02-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

252 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2016-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

When a patient receives a kidney transplant particularly if the kidney is from an older donor or one who has had the kidney removed after their heart has stopped, there is a risk that the newly transplanted kidney may not function immediately. If the delay in function means that dialysis is needed in the first 7 days after the transplantation then this is known as delayed graft function or dDGF. Also delayed graft function that does not require dialysis but is present because the serum creatinine does not fall sufficiently is known as functional delayed graft function or fDGF. This problem is often due to an excessive inflammatory reaction to not having had a blood supply between the time of donation and transplant.

OPN-305 is a monoclonal antibody that blocks Toll-like Receptor 2 which is thought to be partly responsible for increasing the risk of this inflammation. It is hoped that the effects of the inflammation will be reduced and therefore prevent dDGF and fDGF from occurring.

The purpose of the study is to explore how effective OPN-305 is in preventing dDGF and fDGF as well as improving other measures of kidney function and the overall safety of the antibody. In the first part of the study, each patient received an Infusion of one of three possible doses of OPN-305 or a placebo and in the second part the most suitable dose of OPN-305 and a placebo would be used. The purpose of this second part of the study is to find out if a dose of OPN-305 which has already been tested in an earlier part of this study can prevent kidney graft dysfunction. For the purposes of this study, kidney function will be assessed using the composite of delayed graft function (dDGF) because dialysis is necessary in the first 7 days and functional delayed graft function that does not require dialysis but is present because the serum creatinine, a key measure of renal function, does not fall sufficiently (fDGF) in the first 7 days post-transplant.

Protocol OPN305-103 follows out to 12 months post-transplant the clinical status and graft function of patients who have completed the 6-month post-transplant period under Part A or Part B of OPN305-102.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Delayed Graft Function

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

PREVENTION

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

OPN-305

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

OPN-305

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous infusion for 1 hour at start of transplant procedure

Matching placebo

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Intravenous infusion for 1 hour at start of transplant procedure

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

OPN-305

Intravenous infusion for 1 hour at start of transplant procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

Intravenous infusion for 1 hour at start of transplant procedure

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* First or second renal transplant recipient - for second renal transplantations;

* The second transplant should NOT be due to rejection
* Panel Reactive Antibody (PRA) should be \<10%
* Minimum 3 months since the loss of the first transplanted kidney
* Dialysis-dependent at the time of transplantation as documented by:

* Requirement for at least 2 dialysis sessions/week in the 56 days before transplantation


* The donor kidney must be considered compatible according to local transplant guidelines
* An ECD donor defined as:

o Extended Criteria Donor defined as:
* Donor ≥60 years of age
* Donor 50-59 years of age with two of three of the following criteria present:
* Death due to cerebrovascular accident
* Pre-existing history of systemic hypertension
* Terminal creatinine \> 1.5mg/dL (132.6 µmol/L)
* Kidney allograft maintained in cold storage with or without machine perfusion

Exclusion Criteria

* Use of an investigational drug in the 30 days before Study Day 1
* Participation in any other research
* Known hypersensitivity to human monoclonal antibodies or any of the study-drug excipients
* Previous hypersensitivity to basiliximab or anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG)
* History or known HIV, HBV, or HCV-positive
* History of malignancy within the last five years, except excised squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin or cervical intraepithelial neoplasia
* Scheduled to undergo multi-organ transplantation
* Planned dual kidney transplantation
* Presence of clinically significant infections requiring continued therapy
* Active tuberculosis
* Existence of any surgical or medical condition, other than the current transplantation which, in the opinion of the investigator, might significantly alter the distribution, metabolism or excretion of study medication
* Presence of uncontrolled diabetes mellitus.
* Current drug and/or alcohol abuse
* History or presence of a medical condition or disease that in the investigator's assessment would place the patient at an unacceptable risk for study participation
* Lactating or pregnant woman
* Patient institutionalized by administrative or court order


* DCD or SCD donor kidney
* Terminal creatinine \>3mg/dL
* Donor who is known to have received an investigational drug for I-R injury or graft rejection (immunosuppressant) in the 48h before organ recovery
* Participation in any other research (drug or non-drug)
* Kidney donor \<5 years of age or \<20kg body weight
* Living donor allograft
* HLA or ABO incompatible kidney as defined by a negative cytotoxic crossmatch
* Donor institutionalized by administrative or court order
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Opsona Therapeutics Ltd.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Robert M Miller, FRCS MBBS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

OpsonaTherapeutics Ltd.

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Livingston, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charleston, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Bordeaux, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bochum, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bonn, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Erlangen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Mannheim, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Münster, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Tübingen, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Santander, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Zurich, , Switzerland

Site Status

Research Site

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Research Site

Newcastle upon Tyne, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Austria Belgium Czechia France Germany Netherlands Poland Spain Switzerland United Kingdom

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2012-001455-39

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

OPN305-102

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.