Smokers' Response to Nicotine Dependence Genotyping

NCT ID: NCT01780038

Last Updated: 2024-10-31

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

24 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-14

Study Completion Date

2013-08-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Innovative strategies to reduce adult smoking prevalence include using genetic information to motivate cessation and, ultimately, to tailor cessation pharmacotherapy. Success of these interventions depends, in part, on smokers' interest and participation in genetic testing related to cessation and their understanding and use of the results (i.e., their genetic literacy). The recent availability of genetic risk testing for a nicotinic acetylcholine receptor gene (CHRNA3) variant (rs105173) associated with nicotine dependence makes it highly feasible to investigate smokers' interest in and use of genetic information about nicotine dependence. Therefore, the primary purpose of this study is to determine the impact of an intervention that provides smokers with an educational session about genetic contributions to smoking and nicotine dependence plus their genotype results for rs1051730 on smoking cessation outcomes compared to those who receive only the educational session. Secondary purposes are to determine: (a) the impact of genetic education and knowing personal genotype results on genetic literacy outcomes and (b) the feasibility of recruitment and retention methods in a study addressing genotyping for nicotine dependence. Primary outcomes are cessation-related behaviors and cognitions indicating abstinence. Secondary outcomes are cognitions and emotions indicating genetic literacy. Knowledge gained from this study has the potential for clinical translation so that as genotyping becomes part of smoking cessation, health-care providers can understand and address factors influencing smokers' adaptation to genetically-informed cessation treatment. The study will use a longitudinal, repeated measures design (experimental, control; N=90; 45/group). All participants will receive a 90-minute educational session about genetic contributions for smoking and nicotine dependence and will donate a buccal swab sample for genotyping. The investigators will then randomize participants to two groups: those who receive genotyping results in a genetic counseling session (experimental) and those who do not (control). Follow-up data will be collected from both groups at baseline and weeks 2, 6, 10 after the experimental group receives genotyping results, with a brief follow-up and study termination occurring at week 12. Control group participants will be offered their genotyping results at the end of the study.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary aim of this study is:

Aim 1. Determine the impact of knowing personal genotyping results for nicotine dependence risk on the smoking cessation (primary) outcomes at weeks 2, 6, and 10.

The working hypotheses for the cessation-related behaviors are:

1. When compared to the control group, the experimental group will have greater: (1) smoking abstinence; (2) use of formal smoking cessation programs; (3) contact with health-care provider for cessation; (4) use of pharmacotherapy, and (5) use of self-management strategies for cessation.
2. There will be no difference in the number of quit attempts between the experimental and control groups.

The working hypotheses for the cessation-related cognitions are:

1. When compared to the control group, the experimental group will have higher self-efficacy for smoking cessation.
2. When compared to the control group, the experimental group will have higher abstainer and lower smoker self-schemas.

The secondary aims are:

Aim 2. Determine the impact of knowing personal genotyping results for nicotine dependence risk on the secondary genetic literacy (secondary) outcomes at weeks 2, 6, and 10.

The working hypotheses for the genetic literacy-related cognitions and emotions are:

1. When compared to the control group, the experimental group will have greater: (1) knowledge of genetic contributions to smoking, (2) mental representations indicating endorsement of genetic risk for nicotine dependence, (3) accurate perceptions of genetic risk for nicotine dependence, and (4) self-efficacy for use of genotyping results.
2. There will be no difference in psychological distress between the experimental and control groups.

Aim 3. Explore smokers' perceptions and experiences that contextualize participation in genetic education and genotyping for nicotine dependence risk. We will conduct focus groups with both the intervention and control group participants at weeks 2 and 6 after intervention group participants receive their genotyping results.

Aim 4. Determine the feasibility of an intervention that informs people of their personal genotype results for nicotine dependence risk for a larger clinical trial, including evaluation of enrollment (recruitment efficiency, attrition, problems and solutions), intervention fidelity (delivery, receipt, enactment), data collection, subject acceptability of the intervention, and estimation of effect sizes for sample size determination in future, larger clinical trials.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cigarette Smoking Nicotine Dependence

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Receipt of Genetic Results

Receipt of Genetic Results indicates that participants have received the results of genotyping for RS1051730

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Receipt of Genetic Results

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will receive the results of genotyping for RS1051730

No results given

Participants will not be offered to receive the results of genotyping for RS1051730 until all data collection has been completed.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

No results given

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Participants will not be offered to receive the results of genotyping for RS1051730 until all data collection has been completed.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Receipt of Genetic Results

Participants will receive the results of genotyping for RS1051730

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

No results given

Participants will not be offered to receive the results of genotyping for RS1051730 until all data collection has been completed.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* \>19 years of age;
* smoking\>= 10 cigarettes/day;
* intention to quit smoking at some time in the future;
* able to understand, speak, and write in English, and
* physically and mentally able to participate.

The investigators are excluding participants who do not understand, speak or write in English at this time because: (1) the consent document, the educational genetics presentation, and data collection forms are currently written in English only and (2)the resources to make the educational presentation and data collection documents culturally-specific for other cultures are not available. In making the study relevant for non-English speaking participants, it is not only a literal translation the presentation and documents into another language that is needed, but the ideas of health and heredity from the culture related to the language also need to be taken into account when presenting the study and the study materials in another language.

Exclusion Criteria

* current treatment for a mental disorder with psychotic symptoms;
* diagnosis of cancer (other than basal or squamous cell skin cancer) or other life-threatening illness;
* pregnant, or
* currently enrolled in another smoking research study.
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

Yes

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Department of Health and Human Services

FED

Sponsor Role collaborator

University of Nebraska

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Julia F Houfek, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Nebraska

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University of Nebraska Medical Center

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Smerecnik C, Quaak M, van Schayck CP, van Schooten FJ, de Vries H. Are smokers interested in genetic testing for smoking addiction? A socio-cognitive approach. Psychol Health. 2011 Aug;26(8):1099-112. doi: 10.1080/08870446.2010.541909. Epub 2011 Jun 28.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21678175 (View on PubMed)

Brock AJ, Takeda A, Brennan C, Walton RT. Treatment for tobacco dependence: a potential application for stratified medicine? Per Med. 2011 Sep;8(5):571-579. doi: 10.2217/pme.11.60.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29793253 (View on PubMed)

Addicted to Nicotine: A National Research Forum. July 27-28, 1998. Bethesda, Maryland, USA. Proceedings. Nicotine Tob Res. 1999;1 Suppl 2:S1-215. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12022131 (View on PubMed)

Fiore, M. C., Jaen, C.R., Baker, T.B., et al. (2008). Treating Tobacco Use and Dependence. 2008 Update. Clinical Practice Guideline. Rockville, MD: U.S. Department of Health and Human Services. Public Health Service.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Vital signs: current cigarette smoking among adults aged >/=18 years--United States, 2005-2010. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2011 Sep 9;60(35):1207-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21900875 (View on PubMed)

United States Department of Health and Human Services, Healthy People 2020. (2012, January 9). Tobacco Use: Objectives. Retrieved from http://healthypeople.gov/2020/topicsobjectives2020/objectiveslist.aspx?topicId=41

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Quaak M, Smerecnik C, van Schooten FJ, de Vries H, van Schayck CP. Knowledge, attitudes and preferences regarding genetic testing for smoking cessation. A cross-sectional survey among Dutch smokers. BMJ Open. 2012 Jan 5;2(1):e000321. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2011-000321. Print 2012.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 22223839 (View on PubMed)

Read CY, Perry DJ, Duffy ME. Design and psychometric evaluation of the Psychological Adaptation to Genetic Information Scale. J Nurs Scholarsh. 2005;37(3):203-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2005.00036.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 16235859 (View on PubMed)

Smerecnik CM, Mesters I, de Vries NK, de Vries H. Educating the general public about multifactorial genetic disease: applying a theory-based framework to understand current public knowledge. Genet Med. 2008 Apr;10(4):251-8. doi: 10.1097/GIM.0b013e31816b4ffd.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18414207 (View on PubMed)

Pleasant A, McKinney J. Coming to consensus on health literacy measurement: an online discussion and consensus-gauging process. Nurs Outlook. 2011 Mar-Apr;59(2):95-106.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.outlook.2010.12.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21402205 (View on PubMed)

Weinman J, Petrie KJ. Illness perceptions: a new paradigm for psychosomatics? J Psychosom Res. 1997 Feb;42(2):113-6. doi: 10.1016/s0022-3999(96)00294-2. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9076639 (View on PubMed)

Brownlee, S., Leventhal, H., & Leventhal, E. A. (2000). Regulation, self-regulation, and construction of the self in maintenance of physical health. In M. Boekaerts, P.R. Pintrich, & M. Zeidner, (Eds.). Handbook of Self-Regulation. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, pp. 369-416.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Munafo M, Clark T, Johnstone E, Murphy M, Walton R. The genetic basis for smoking behavior: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Nicotine Tob Res. 2004 Aug;6(4):583-97. doi: 10.1080/14622200410001734030.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15370155 (View on PubMed)

Cervone D. The architecture of personality. Psychol Rev. 2004 Jan;111(1):183-204. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.111.1.183.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 14756593 (View on PubMed)

Benowitz NL. Clinical pharmacology of nicotine: implications for understanding, preventing, and treating tobacco addiction. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Apr;83(4):531-41. doi: 10.1038/clpt.2008.3. Epub 2008 Feb 27.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18305452 (View on PubMed)

Thorgeirsson TE, Geller F, Sulem P, Rafnar T, Wiste A, Magnusson KP, Manolescu A, Thorleifsson G, Stefansson H, Ingason A, Stacey SN, Bergthorsson JT, Thorlacius S, Gudmundsson J, Jonsson T, Jakobsdottir M, Saemundsdottir J, Olafsdottir O, Gudmundsson LJ, Bjornsdottir G, Kristjansson K, Skuladottir H, Isaksson HJ, Gudbjartsson T, Jones GT, Mueller T, Gottsater A, Flex A, Aben KKH, de Vegt F, Mulders PFA, Isla D, Vidal MJ, Asin L, Saez B, Murillo L, Blondal T, Kolbeinsson H, Stefansson JG, Hansdottir I, Runarsdottir V, Pola R, Lindblad B, van Rij AM, Dieplinger B, Haltmayer M, Mayordomo JI, Kiemeney LA, Matthiasson SE, Oskarsson H, Tyrfingsson T, Gudbjartsson DF, Gulcher JR, Jonsson S, Thorsteinsdottir U, Kong A, Stefansson K. A variant associated with nicotine dependence, lung cancer and peripheral arterial disease. Nature. 2008 Apr 3;452(7187):638-642. doi: 10.1038/nature06846.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18385739 (View on PubMed)

Ducci F, Kaakinen M, Pouta A, Hartikainen AL, Veijola J, Isohanni M, Charoen P, Coin L, Hoggart C, Ekelund J, Peltonen L, Freimer N, Elliott P, Schumann G, Jarvelin MR. TTC12-ANKK1-DRD2 and CHRNA5-CHRNA3-CHRNB4 influence different pathways leading to smoking behavior from adolescence to mid-adulthood. Biol Psychiatry. 2011 Apr 1;69(7):650-60. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsych.2010.09.055. Epub 2010 Dec 17.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21168125 (View on PubMed)

Munafo MR, Johnstone EC, Walther D, Uhl GR, Murphy MF, Aveyard P. CHRNA3 rs1051730 genotype and short-term smoking cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2011 Oct;13(10):982-8. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntr106. Epub 2011 Jun 20.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21690317 (View on PubMed)

Hung RJ, McKay JD, Gaborieau V, Boffetta P, Hashibe M, Zaridze D, Mukeria A, Szeszenia-Dabrowska N, Lissowska J, Rudnai P, Fabianova E, Mates D, Bencko V, Foretova L, Janout V, Chen C, Goodman G, Field JK, Liloglou T, Xinarianos G, Cassidy A, McLaughlin J, Liu G, Narod S, Krokan HE, Skorpen F, Elvestad MB, Hveem K, Vatten L, Linseisen J, Clavel-Chapelon F, Vineis P, Bueno-de-Mesquita HB, Lund E, Martinez C, Bingham S, Rasmuson T, Hainaut P, Riboli E, Ahrens W, Benhamou S, Lagiou P, Trichopoulos D, Holcatova I, Merletti F, Kjaerheim K, Agudo A, Macfarlane G, Talamini R, Simonato L, Lowry R, Conway DI, Znaor A, Healy C, Zelenika D, Boland A, Delepine M, Foglio M, Lechner D, Matsuda F, Blanche H, Gut I, Heath S, Lathrop M, Brennan P. A susceptibility locus for lung cancer maps to nicotinic acetylcholine receptor subunit genes on 15q25. Nature. 2008 Apr 3;452(7187):633-7. doi: 10.1038/nature06885.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18385738 (View on PubMed)

Amos CI, Wu X, Broderick P, Gorlov IP, Gu J, Eisen T, Dong Q, Zhang Q, Gu X, Vijayakrishnan J, Sullivan K, Matakidou A, Wang Y, Mills G, Doheny K, Tsai YY, Chen WV, Shete S, Spitz MR, Houlston RS. Genome-wide association scan of tag SNPs identifies a susceptibility locus for lung cancer at 15q25.1. Nat Genet. 2008 May;40(5):616-22. doi: 10.1038/ng.109. Epub 2008 Apr 2.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18385676 (View on PubMed)

Abrams, D.B., Niaura, R., Brown, R.A., Emmons, K.M., Goldstein, M.G., & Monti, P.M. (2003). The Tobacco Dependence Treatment Handbook: A Guide to Best Practices. New York: The Guilford Press.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Quaak M, van Schayck CP, Knaapen AM, van Schooten FJ. Genetic variation as a predictor of smoking cessation success. A promising preventive and intervention tool for chronic respiratory diseases? Eur Respir J. 2009 Mar;33(3):468-80. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00056908.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 19251795 (View on PubMed)

Lerman CE, Schnoll RA, Munafo MR. Genetics and smoking cessation improving outcomes in smokers at risk. Am J Prev Med. 2007 Dec;33(6 Suppl):S398-405. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2007.09.006.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 18021915 (View on PubMed)

Malaiyandi V, Sellers EM, Tyndale RF. Implications of CYP2A6 genetic variation for smoking behaviors and nicotine dependence. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2005 Mar;77(3):145-58. doi: 10.1016/j.clpt.2004.10.011.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15735609 (View on PubMed)

Smerecnik C, Grispen JE, Quaak M. Effectiveness of testing for genetic susceptibility to smoking-related diseases on smoking cessation outcomes: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Tob Control. 2012 May;21(3):347-54. doi: 10.1136/tc.2011.042739. Epub 2011 Sep 26.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21948804 (View on PubMed)

Hughes JR, Keely JP, Niaura RS, Ossip-Klein DJ, Richmond RL, Swan GE. Measures of abstinence in clinical trials: issues and recommendations. Nicotine Tob Res. 2003 Feb;5(1):13-25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12745503 (View on PubMed)

Audrain J, Boyd NR, Roth J, Main D, Caporaso NF, Lerman C. Genetic susceptibility testing in smoking-cessation treatment: one-year outcomes of a randomized trial. Addict Behav. 1997 Nov-Dec;22(6):741-51. doi: 10.1016/s0306-4603(97)00060-9.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9426791 (View on PubMed)

Perkins, K.A., Conklin, C.A., & Levine, M.D. (2008). Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Smoking Cessation. New York: Routledge.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Cokkinides VE, Ward E, Jemal A, Thun MJ. Under-use of smoking-cessation treatments: results from the National Health Interview Survey, 2000. Am J Prev Med. 2005 Jan;28(1):119-22. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2004.09.007.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 15626567 (View on PubMed)

Hung WT, Dunlop SM, Perez D, Cotter T. Use and perceived helpfulness of smoking cessation methods: results from a population survey of recent quitters. BMC Public Health. 2011 Jul 27;11:592. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-11-592.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21791111 (View on PubMed)

Wright AJ, Weinman J, Marteau TM. The impact of learning of a genetic predisposition to nicotine dependence: an analogue study. Tob Control. 2003 Jun;12(2):227-30. doi: 10.1136/tc.12.2.227.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12773736 (View on PubMed)

Etter JF, Bergman MM, Humair JP, Perneger TV. Development and validation of a scale measuring self-efficacy of current and former smokers. Addiction. 2000 Jun;95(6):901-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1360-0443.2000.9569017.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10946439 (View on PubMed)

Liang, K.Y, & Zeger, S.L. (1986). Longitudinal data analysis using generalized linear models. Biometrika, 73, 13-22

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Weinman, J., Petrie, K.J., Moss-Morris, R., & Horne, R. (1996). The illness perception questionnaire: A new method for assessing cognitive representations of illness. Psychology & Health, 11, 431-445.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Velicer WF, Diclemente CC, Rossi JS, Prochaska JO. Relapse situations and self-efficacy: an integrative model. Addict Behav. 1990;15(3):271-83. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(90)90070-e.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 2378287 (View on PubMed)

SRNT Subcommittee on Biochemical Verification. Biochemical verification of tobacco use and cessation. Nicotine Tob Res. 2002 May;4(2):149-59. doi: 10.1080/14622200210123581. No abstract available.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12028847 (View on PubMed)

Doak LG, Doak CC, Meade CD. Strategies to improve cancer education materials. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1996 Sep;23(8):1305-12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8883075 (View on PubMed)

McBride CM, Bepler G, Lipkus IM, Lyna P, Samsa G, Albright J, Datta S, Rimer BK. Incorporating genetic susceptibility feedback into a smoking cessation program for African-American smokers with low income. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2002 Jun;11(6):521-8.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 12050092 (View on PubMed)

Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical Power Analysis for the Behavioral Sciences. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Lerman C, Gold K, Audrain J, Lin TH, Boyd NR, Orleans CT, Wilfond B, Louben G, Caporaso N. Incorporating biomarkers of exposure and genetic susceptibility into smoking cessation treatment: effects on smoking-related cognitions, emotions, and behavior change. Health Psychol. 1997 Jan;16(1):87-99. doi: 10.1037//0278-6133.16.1.87.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 9028818 (View on PubMed)

Spielberger, C.D. (1995b). Preliminary Manual for the State-Trait Personality Inventory (STPI). Unpublished manual.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Spielberger, C.D. (1995a). Scoring information for the revised STPI. Tampa: Center for Research in Behavioral Medicine and Health Psychology, University of South Florida.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Wright AJ, French DP, Weinman J, Marteau TM. Can genetic risk information enhance motivation for smoking cessation? An analogue study. Health Psychol. 2006 Nov;25(6):740-52. doi: 10.1037/0278-6133.25.6.740.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17100502 (View on PubMed)

Sanderson SC, Michie S. Genetic testing for heart disease susceptibility: potential impact on motivation to quit smoking. Clin Genet. 2007 Jun;71(6):501-10. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00810.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 17539899 (View on PubMed)

Cameron LD, Marteau TM, Brown PM, Klein WM, Sherman KA. Communication strategies for enhancing understanding of the behavioral implications of genetic and biomarker tests for disease risk: the role of coherence. J Behav Med. 2012 Jun;35(3):286-98. doi: 10.1007/s10865-011-9361-5. Epub 2011 Jun 23.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21698440 (View on PubMed)

Sanderson SC, Waller J, Humphries SE, Wardle J. Public awareness of genetic influence on chronic disease risk: are genetic and lifestyle causal beliefs compatible? Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(4-5):290-7. doi: 10.1159/000294280. Epub 2010 Apr 29.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20431275 (View on PubMed)

Henderson BJ, Maguire BT. Three lay mental models of disease inheritance. Soc Sci Med. 2000 Jan;50(2):293-301. doi: 10.1016/s0277-9536(99)00286-5.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 10619697 (View on PubMed)

Moss-Morris, R., Weinman, J., Petrie, K.J., Horne, R., Cameron, L.D., & Buick, D. (2002). The revised illness perception questionnaire (IPQ-R). Psychology & Health, 17, 1-16.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Condit CM. Public understandings of genetics and health. Clin Genet. 2010 Jan;77(1):1-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2009.01316.x.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20092586 (View on PubMed)

Smerecnik CM, Mesters I, de Vries NK, de Vries H. Applying a theory-based framework to understand public knowledge of genetic risk factors: a case for the distinction between how-to knowledge and principles knowledge. Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(4-5):259-70. doi: 10.1159/000294149. Epub 2010 Mar 12.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20224242 (View on PubMed)

Park ER, Kleimann S, Youatt EJ, Lockhart A, Campbell EG, Levy DE, Halbert CH, Schmieder E, Krishna R, Shields AE. Black and White adults' perspectives on the genetics of nicotine addiction susceptibility. Addict Behav. 2011 Jul;36(7):769-72. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2011.02.007. Epub 2011 Feb 25.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 21406316 (View on PubMed)

Shadel WG, Mermelstein R, Borrelli B. Self-concept changes over time in cognitive-behavioral treatment for smoking cessation. Addict Behav. 1996 Sep-Oct;21(5):659-63. doi: 10.1016/0306-4603(95)00088-7.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 8876764 (View on PubMed)

Cappella, J.N., Lerman, C., Romantan, A., & Baruh, L. (2003). News about genetics and smoking. Communications Research, 32, 478-502.

Reference Type BACKGROUND

Hendricks PS, Delucchi KL, Hall SM. Mechanisms of change in extended cognitive behavioral treatment for tobacco dependence. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2010 Jun 1;109(1-3):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2009.12.021. Epub 2010 Jan 21.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 20096510 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

0069-12-FB

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Early Tobacco Abstinence - 5
NCT00224965 TERMINATED PHASE1
Cigarette Smoking Decision Study
NCT04595279 COMPLETED NA
Helping Poor Smokers Quit
NCT03194958 COMPLETED NA