A Study of the Bruton's Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Ibrutinib Given in Combination With Bendamustine and Rituximab in Patients With Newly Diagnosed Mantle Cell Lymphoma

NCT ID: NCT01776840

Last Updated: 2025-07-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

523 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-05-16

Study Completion Date

2024-06-24

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib given in combination with bendamustine and rituximab in patients 65 years of age or older with newly diagnosed mantle cell lymphoma.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This is a randomized (individuals assigned to study treatment by chance), double blind (neither physician nor participant knows the treatment that the participant receives), placebo (an inactive substance that is compared with a drug to test whether the drug has a real effect in a clinical trial)-controlled study to compare the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib given in combination with bendamustine and rituximab (BR) with BR alone in participants newly diagnosed with mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) who are 65 years of age or older. Approximately 520 participants will be randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio and stratified by simplified Mantle Cell Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (MIPI) score (low risk \[0-3\] versus intermediate risk \[4-5\] versus high risk \[6-11\]). The treatment phase will extend from randomization until discontinuation of all study treatment or the clinical cutoff for the end of study. A cycle is defined as 28 days. All participants will receive open-label (identity of assigned study drug will be known) BR background therapy for a maximum of 6 cycles; participants with a complete response or partial response will continue to receive open-label background therapy with rituximab maintenance every second cycle for a maximum of 12 additional doses. In addition to the background therapy, all participants will receive blinded study drug (ibrutinib or placebo). Participants randomized to treatment Arm A will receive placebo capsules and participants randomized to treatment Arm B will receive ibrutinib capsules. Study drug will be administered daily and continuously until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Participants with stable disease after initial chemoimmunotherapy (BR+ibrutinib/placebo) should continue treatment with ibrutinib/placebo until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or study end. Participants with progressive disease must discontinue all study treatment. For participants who discontinue background therapy and do not have progressive disease, treatment with study drug will continue until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity or the clinical cutoff for the final analysis of progression-free survival (PFS). Participants receiving BR, rituximab, or ibrutinib at the clinical cutoff for the final analysis of PFS will continue open-label treatment until disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Placebo will be stopped when the study is unblinded for the clinical cutoff for the final analysis of PFS. The posttreatment follow-up phase will begin once a participant discontinues bendamustine and rituximab and study drug. Participants who discontinue for reasons other than disease progression must continue to have disease evaluations as outlined in the protocol. Participants who discontinue due to disease progression will be followed for survival and subsequent anti-MCL therapy. The posttreatment follow-up phase will continue until death, lost to follow up, consent withdrawal, or study end, whichever occurs first. Four clinical cutoffs are planned. The first 3 clinical cutoffs will occur when approximately 134, 180, and 265 PFS events have been observed, respectively. The interim analyses and the final analysis of PFS will take place at these 3 clinical cutoffs, respectively; participant treatment assignment will be unblinded and placebo treatment will be stopped at the clinical cutoff for the final analysis of PFS. Treatment unblinding and stopping of placebo treatment could occur before the planned final analysis of PFS if recommended by the independent Data Monitoring Committee (DMC) after an interim analysis. The last cutoff will occur at the end of study, when 60% of the randomized participants have died or the Sponsor terminates the study, whichever comes first. Efficacy assessments will be conducted in accordance with the Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma. Safety will be monitored throughout the study and summarized. Blood samples will be drawn for assessment of pharmacokinetic parameters. Blood and bone marrow will be collected for assessment of minimal residual disease and biomarker studies.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Mantle Cell Lymphoma

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Treatment Arm A

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

90 mg/m2 administered intravenously on Days 1-2, Cycles 1-6

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 administered intravenously on Day 1, Cycles 1-6; if complete response or partial response is achieved, 375 mg/m2 is administered on Day 1 of every second cycle for a maximum of 12 additional doses

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

4 capsules administered orally once daily continuously starting on Day 1, Cycle 1 until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity, or the final analysis of progression-free survival

Treatment Arm B

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Bendamustine

Intervention Type DRUG

90 mg/m2 administered intravenously on Days 1-2, Cycles 1-6

Rituximab

Intervention Type DRUG

375 mg/m2 administered intravenously on Day 1, Cycles 1-6; if complete response or partial response is achieved, 375 mg/m2 is administered on Day 1 of every second cycle for a maximum of 12 additional doses

Ibrutinib

Intervention Type DRUG

560 mg (4 x 140 mg capsules) administered orally once daily continuously starting on Day 1, Cycle 1 until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity, or study end

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Bendamustine

90 mg/m2 administered intravenously on Days 1-2, Cycles 1-6

Intervention Type DRUG

Rituximab

375 mg/m2 administered intravenously on Day 1, Cycles 1-6; if complete response or partial response is achieved, 375 mg/m2 is administered on Day 1 of every second cycle for a maximum of 12 additional doses

Intervention Type DRUG

Ibrutinib

560 mg (4 x 140 mg capsules) administered orally once daily continuously starting on Day 1, Cycle 1 until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity, or study end

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

4 capsules administered orally once daily continuously starting on Day 1, Cycle 1 until disease progression, or unacceptable toxicity, or the final analysis of progression-free survival

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Diagnosis of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) reviewed and approved by central laboratory: diagnosis must include morphology and expression of either cyclin D1 in association with other relevant markers (eg, CD19, CD20, PAX5 and CD5) or evidence of t(11;14) as assessed by cytogenetics, fluorescent in situ hybridization (FISH), or polymerase chain reaction (PCR)
* Clinical Stage II, III, or IV by Ann Arbor Classification
* At least 1 measurable site of disease according to Revised Response Criteria for Malignant Lymphoma
* No prior therapies for MCL
* Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status grade 0 or 1
* Hematology and biochemical laboratory values within protocol-defined limits
* Agrees to protocol-defined use of effective contraception
* Negative blood or urine pregnancy test at screening

Exclusion Criteria

* Major surgery within 4 weeks of random assignment
* Known central nervous system lymphoma
* Diagnosed or treated for malignancy other than MCL, except: malignancy treated with curative intent and with no known active disease present for \>=3 years before random assignment; adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancer or lentigo maligna without evidence of disease; adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ without evidence of disease
* Patients for whom the goal of therapy is tumor debulking prior to stem cell transplant
* History of stroke or intracranial hemorrhage within 6 months prior to random assignment
* Requires anticoagulation with warfarin or equivalent vitamin K antagonists
* Requires treatment with strong CYP3A inhibitors
* Clinically significant cardiovascular disease such as uncontrolled or symptomatic arrhythmias, congestive heart failure, or myocardial infarction within 6 months of Screening, or any Class 3 (moderate) or Class 4 (severe) cardiac disease as defined by the New York Heart Association Functional Classification
* Vaccinated with live, attenuated vaccines within 4 weeks of random assignment
* Known history of human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) or active hepatitis C virus or active hepatitis B virus infection or any uncontrolled active systemic infection requiring intravenous antibiotics
* Any life-threatening illness, medical condition, or organ system dysfunction which, in the investigator's opinion, could compromise the patient's safety, interfere with the absorption or metabolism of ibrutinib capsules, or put the study outcomes at undue risk
Minimum Eligible Age

65 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Pharmacyclics LLC.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Janssen Research & Development, LLC

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

La Jolla, California, United States

Site Status

Stanford, California, United States

Site Status

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Stamford, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Niles, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Goshen, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Iowa City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Sioux City, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Topeka, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Westwood, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Jefferson City, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Lincoln, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Hackensack, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

New Brunswick, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States

Site Status

Albany, New York, United States

Site Status

Hawthorne, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greenville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Bismarck, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Eugene, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Greenville, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Watertown, South Dakota, United States

Site Status

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Burlington, Vermont, United States

Site Status

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Vancouver, Washington, United States

Site Status

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Córdoba, , Argentina

Site Status

La Capital, , Argentina

Site Status

Paraná, , Argentina

Site Status

Adelaide, , Australia

Site Status

Auchenflower, , Australia

Site Status

Box Hill, , Australia

Site Status

Concord, , Australia

Site Status

Douglas, , Australia

Site Status

Gosford, , Australia

Site Status

Hobart, , Australia

Site Status

Prahran, , Australia

Site Status

Antwerp, , Belgium

Site Status

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Yvoir, , Belgium

Site Status

Barretos, , Brazil

Site Status

Goiânia, , Brazil

Site Status

Porto Alegre, , Brazil

Site Status

Ribeirão Preto, , Brazil

Site Status

Rio de Janeiro, , Brazil

Site Status

São Paulo, , Brazil

Site Status

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Beijing, , China

Site Status

Chengdu, , China

Site Status

Guangzhou, , China

Site Status

Hangzhou, , China

Site Status

Shanghai, , China

Site Status

Tianjin, , China

Site Status

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Hradec Králové, , Czechia

Site Status

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Créteil, , France

Site Status

F-75 730 Paris Cedex 15, , France

Site Status

Grenoble, , France

Site Status

Nantes, , France

Site Status

Paris, , France

Site Status

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Tours, , France

Site Status

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Heidelberg, , Germany

Site Status

Jena, , Germany

Site Status

Mainz, , Germany

Site Status

München, , Germany

Site Status

TÿBINGEN, , Germany

Site Status

Ulm, , Germany

Site Status

Villingen-Schwenningen, , Germany

Site Status

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Athens Attica, , Greece

Site Status

Thessalonikis, , Greece

Site Status

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Kaposvár, , Hungary

Site Status

Pécs, , Hungary

Site Status

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Dublin, , Ireland

Site Status

Galway, , Ireland

Site Status

Afula, , Israel

Site Status

Beersheba, , Israel

Site Status

Haifa, , Israel

Site Status

Jerusalem, , Israel

Site Status

Nahariya, , Israel

Site Status

Petah Tikva, , Israel

Site Status

Ramat Gan, , Israel

Site Status

Tel Aviv, , Israel

Site Status

Ẕerifin, , Israel

Site Status

Fukuoka, , Japan

Site Status

Hiroshima, , Japan

Site Status

Kyoto, , Japan

Site Status

Nagoya, , Japan

Site Status

Osaka, , Japan

Site Status

Sapporo, , Japan

Site Status

Sendai, , Japan

Site Status

Suita, , Japan

Site Status

Tokyo, , Japan

Site Status

Monterrey, , Mexico

Site Status

Oaxaca City, , Mexico

Site Status

Amsterdam-Zuidoost, , Netherlands

Site Status

Dordrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Groningen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Leiden, , Netherlands

Site Status

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Bydgoszcz, , Poland

Site Status

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Olsztyn, , Poland

Site Status

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Chelyabinsk, , Russia

Site Status

Krasnodar, , Russia

Site Status

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Novosibirsk, , Russia

Site Status

Petrozavodsk, , Russia

Site Status

Rostov-on-Don, , Russia

Site Status

Ryazan, , Russia

Site Status

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Sochi, , Russia

Site Status

St.Petersurg, , Russia

Site Status

Syktyvkar, , Russia

Site Status

Volgograd, , Russia

Site Status

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Banská Bystrica, , Slovakia

Site Status

Bratislava, , Slovakia

Site Status

Košice, , Slovakia

Site Status

Martin, , Slovakia

Site Status

Prešov, , Slovakia

Site Status

Gyeonggi-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Jeollanam-do, , South Korea

Site Status

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Barcelona, , Spain

Site Status

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Oviedo, , Spain

Site Status

Palma de Mallorca, , Spain

Site Status

Salamanca, , Spain

Site Status

Santiago de Compostela, , Spain

Site Status

Linköping, , Sweden

Site Status

Lund, , Sweden

Site Status

Stockholm, , Sweden

Site Status

Umeaa, , Sweden

Site Status

Uppsala, , Sweden

Site Status

Changhua, , Taiwan

Site Status

Kaohsiung County, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taichung, , Taiwan

Site Status

Tainan City, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taipei, , Taiwan

Site Status

Taoyuan District, , Taiwan

Site Status

Adana, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Ankara, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Diyarbakır, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Istanbul, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Izmir, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Kayseri, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Mersin, , Turkey (Türkiye)

Site Status

Cherkassy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Donetsk, , Ukraine

Site Status

Khmelnitskiy, , Ukraine

Site Status

Kiev, , Ukraine

Site Status

Lviv, , Ukraine

Site Status

Canterbury, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Glasgow, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leeds, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Leicester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Liverpool, , United Kingdom

Site Status

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Manchester, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Plymouth, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Southampton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Sutton, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Australia Belgium Brazil Canada China Czechia France Germany Greece Hungary Ireland Israel Japan Mexico Netherlands Poland Puerto Rico Russia Slovakia South Korea Spain Sweden Taiwan Turkey (Türkiye) Ukraine United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wang ML, Jurczak W, Jerkeman M, Trotman J, Zinzani PL, Belada D, Boccomini C, Flinn IW, Giri P, Goy A, Hamlin PA, Hermine O, Hernandez-Rivas JA, Hong X, Kim SJ, Lewis D, Mishima Y, Ozcan M, Perini GF, Pocock C, Song Y, Spurgeon SE, Storring JM, Walewski J, Zhu J, Qin R, Henninger T, Deshpande S, Howes A, Le Gouill S, Dreyling M; SHINE Investigators. Ibrutinib plus Bendamustine and Rituximab in Untreated Mantle-Cell Lymphoma. N Engl J Med. 2022 Jun 30;386(26):2482-2494. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2201817. Epub 2022 Jun 3.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35657079 (View on PubMed)

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol

View Document

Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

PCI-32765MCL3002

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

U1111-1137-0389

Identifier Type: OTHER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

2012-004056-11

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

CR100967

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.