Palliative Care in People Living With HIV/AIDS: Integrating Into Standard of Care

NCT ID: NCT01775436

Last Updated: 2020-07-15

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

444 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-10-13

Study Completion Date

2017-03-28

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Our goal is to advance palliative care with persons living with AIDS (PLWA) or life-limiting co-morbidities to decrease suffering and increase quality of life (QOL). Left without advance care planning (ACP) for end-of-life decision, miscommunication and disagreements may result in families being charged with neglect or court battles over treatment choices, unmet care or delivery of unnecessary or unwanted care, and non-relative caregivers being dismissed (e.g. gay partners). We hope to increase families' understandings of their family member's wishes for end-of-life care to decrease conflict through the FAmily-CEntered Advance (FACE) Care Planning intervention. We will also study communication, quality of life, and spiritual struggle. Families will be randomized into either the Control (N=96 families) or the FACE Intervention (n=192 dyads). FACE families will meet with a trained/certified researcher for two 60-minute sessions scheduled one week apart: Session 1: The Respecting Choices Interview®; and Session 2: Completion of The Five Wishes©. Control families will also meet with a researcher for two 60-minute sessions scheduled one week apart: Session 1: Developmental History; and Session 2: Nutrition and Exercise. Questionnaires will be administered five times, Baseline and at 3, 6, 12 and 18 month post-intervention, for an average of 2 years.

AIM 1. To determine the efficacy of FACE on congruence in treatment preferences between PLWA and their surrogates over time, and the effect of the pattern of congruence development trajectory on healthcare utilization (i.e., distal outcomes: number of hospitalizations, dialysis, ER visits).

Hypothesis A: Development of congruence may not be homogeneous and FACE may influence the pattern of congruence development.

Hypothesis B: Different patterns of congruence development may have different effects on health care utilization.

Hypothesis C: Compared to Controls, FACE participants will better maintain congruence over time.

AIM 2. To determine the efficacy of FACE on key components of QOL for PLWA. Hypothesis: FACE participants will increase or better maintain psychosocial QOL compared to Controls.

AIM 3. To minimize health disparities in ACP between Blacks and non Blacks and identify factors associated with disparities.

Hypothesis: Blacks in the FACE intervention will complete advance directives at a rate comparable to non Blacks, and at significantly greater rates compared to Controls.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Our goal is to advance palliative care with persons living with AIDS (PLWA) or life-limiting co-morbidities aimed at relieving suffering and maximizing quality of life. One objective is to identify variables which influence decision-making with respect to advance care planning (ACP) for PLWA, as well as to determine the unique person-centered needs of subgroups of PLWA, as these are unknown. The negative consequences of no ACP or poor ACP include: unmet care or delivery of unnecessary or unwanted care, conflict erupting in the ICU, or the importance of non-relative caregivers being dismissed, for example gay partners. A second objective is to identify a "best approach" for standard of care in ACP, a key component of palliative care, as an end of life support. This approach may minimize health disparities in the likelihood of both identifying a surrogate decision-maker and using advance directives. We propose building on our evidence based, theoretical model, FAmily-CEntered (FACE) Advance Care Planning intervention, an HIV specific ACP program for Black teens which gained acceptance and demonstrated efficacy through increased congruence in treatment preferences and universal complete of advance directives with a surrogate decision-maker. Given the demonstrated needs and benefits of ACP and the low utilization among adult Black PLWA, we propose meeting this need by building on our FACE model with adults living with advanced AIDS and/or life-limiting co-morbidities in Washington, District of Columbia (DC) a city with endemic HIV and significant health disparities in death rates by race in an adequately-powered, randomized, clinical, 2-arm, single-blinded, controlled trial. We will test the efficacy of the FACE intervention for increasing congruence in end-of-life treatment preferences between PLWA and their surrogate decision-maker, to determine if increased congruence can be maintained over time. We will also determine if FACE is acceptable to primarily Black inner city adult PLWA. We will recruit from four hospital-based clinics and randomize 288 patient/surrogate dyads (N=576 subjects) in a 2:1 ratio to either FACE Intervention (N=192 dyads) or Control (N=96 dyads). Participants with HIV dementia, suicidality, homicidality or psychosis will be excluded. Two 60-minuted sessions will be conducted with a trained/certified facilitator at weekly intervals: FACE Session 1: The Respecting Choices Interview (R); Session 2: Completion of The Five Wishes (c). Control will also be administered in a dyadic format: Session 1: Developmental History; Session 2: Nutrition and Exercise. Standardized self-report measures will be administered at baseline, 3 month post-intervention 6 month post-intervention, 12 month post-intervention, and 18 month post-intervention. Thus, participants will be followed for an average of 2 years. This will be the first study to test an ACP model, integrating person-centered (GMM) and variable-centered analysis (GEE) to assess study outcomes.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

HIV

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Outcome Assessors
Assessor did not know which study arm the participant was randomized to.

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Healthy Living Control

Two-60 to 90 minute sessions scheduled one week apart.

Session 1: Developmental History: Goal: To take a non-medical developmental history. The Research Assistant (RA)-Control will conduct the session in a structured interview format. Administered with all medical questions removed to prevent any risk of contamination with the experimental condition.

Session 2: Nutrition and Exercise: Assess nutritional status and provide advice for maintaining optimal nutrition to boost immune functioning. Administered by the RA Control and will be videotaped to control for what occurs in the FACE intervention.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

FAmily-CEntered Advance Care Planning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Two-60 to 90 minute sessions scheduled one week apart.

Session 1: Respecting Choices Interview (R)to facilitate conversations and shared decision-making between the patient and surrogate about palliative care \& prepare the surrogate to be able to fully represent the patient's wishes.

Session 2: Five Wishes (C). Patient selects which person the patient wants to make health care decisions for him/her; the kind of medical treatment the patient wants; how comfortable the patient wants to be; how the patient wants people to treat him/her; what patient wants loved ones to know; and any spiritual or religious concerns the patient may have.

Healthy Living Control

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Session 1: Developmental History: Goal: To take a non-medical developmental history. The RA-Control will conduct the session in a structured interview format. Administered with all medical questions removed to prevent any risk of contamination with the experimental condition.

Session 2: Nutrition and Exercise: Assess nutritional status and provide advice for maintaining optimal nutrition to boost immune functioning. Administered by the RA Control and will be videotaped to control for what occurs in the FACE intervention.

FAmily-CEntered Advance Care Planning

Two-60 to 90 minute sessions scheduled one week apart.

Session 1: Respecting Choices Interview (R)to facilitate conversations and shared decision-making between the patient and surrogate about palliative care \& prepare the surrogate to be able to fully represent the patient's wishes.

Session 2: Five Wishes (C). Patient selects which person the patient wants to make health care decisions for him/her; the kind of medical treatment the patient wants; how comfortable the patient wants to be; how the patient wants people to treat him/her; what patient wants loved ones to know; and any spiritual or religious concerns the patient may have.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

FAmily-CEntered Advance Care Planning

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Two-60 to 90 minute sessions scheduled one week apart.

Session 1: Respecting Choices Interview (R)to facilitate conversations and shared decision-making between the patient and surrogate about palliative care \& prepare the surrogate to be able to fully represent the patient's wishes.

Session 2: Five Wishes (C). Patient selects which person the patient wants to make health care decisions for him/her; the kind of medical treatment the patient wants; how comfortable the patient wants to be; how the patient wants people to treat him/her; what patient wants loved ones to know; and any spiritual or religious concerns the patient may have.

Healthy Living Control

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Session 1: Developmental History: Goal: To take a non-medical developmental history. The RA-Control will conduct the session in a structured interview format. Administered with all medical questions removed to prevent any risk of contamination with the experimental condition.

Session 2: Nutrition and Exercise: Assess nutritional status and provide advice for maintaining optimal nutrition to boost immune functioning. Administered by the RA Control and will be videotaped to control for what occurs in the FACE intervention.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

FAmily-CEntered Advance Care Planning

Two-60 to 90 minute sessions scheduled one week apart.

Session 1: Respecting Choices Interview (R)to facilitate conversations and shared decision-making between the patient and surrogate about palliative care \& prepare the surrogate to be able to fully represent the patient's wishes.

Session 2: Five Wishes (C). Patient selects which person the patient wants to make health care decisions for him/her; the kind of medical treatment the patient wants; how comfortable the patient wants to be; how the patient wants people to treat him/her; what patient wants loved ones to know; and any spiritual or religious concerns the patient may have.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Healthy Living Control

Session 1: Developmental History: Goal: To take a non-medical developmental history. The RA-Control will conduct the session in a structured interview format. Administered with all medical questions removed to prevent any risk of contamination with the experimental condition.

Session 2: Nutrition and Exercise: Assess nutritional status and provide advice for maintaining optimal nutrition to boost immune functioning. Administered by the RA Control and will be videotaped to control for what occurs in the FACE intervention.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

FACE HLC

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* HIV positive outpatients or inpatients with detectable viral load (\>200 copies) twice in the past 1 year period OR CD4 count \<200 OR with a co-morbidity that may significantly limit life expectancy, including malignancy, cirrhosis, cardiomyopathy, etc.
* Patients with AIDS receiving dialysis, inpatients or outpatients
* Patients not in the Intensive Care Unit (ICU)
* Age 21 years or older
* All ethnic groups
* Male or female
* Knows his/her HIV status
* English speaking
* Absence of active psychosis or homicidal or suicidal ideation, determined at baseline screening by a trained research assistant as assessed by questions from a structured questionnaire
* Absence of HIV dementia, determined at screening using the HIV Dementia Scale cut off score of \<10
* No evidence of developmental delay
* Consent from surrogate
* Consent from persons living with AIDS (PLWA) aged 21 or older


* Selected by patient
* Age 18 or older
* Willingness to discuss problems related to HIV and End Of Life (EOL)
* Absence of active psychosis, homicidal ideation, or suicidal ideation determined at baseline screening by trained RA
* Absence of HIV dementia, determined at screening using the HIV Dementia Scale cut off score of \<10
* English speaking
* Consent to participate
* Knows HIV status of patient

Exclusion Criteria

* Patients in the ICU
* Age under 21 years old
* Patient unaware of HIV status
* Active psychosis or homicidal or suicidal ideation, determined at baseline screening by a trained research assistant as assessed by questions from a structured questionnaire
* Presence fo HIV Dementia at baseline
* Developmental delay
* Unable to find willing consented surrogate


* Surrogate under age of 18 years old
* Unwilling to discuss problems related to HIV and EOL
* Active psychosis or homicidal or suicidal ideation, determined at baseline screening by a trained research assistant as assessed by questions from a structured questionnaire
* Not an English speaker
* Unwilling to consent to participate and does not know HIV status of patient
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Georgetown University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

George Washington University

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

VA Medical Center

UNKNOWN

Sponsor Role collaborator

Medstar Health Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Children's National Research Institute

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Maureen Lyon

Principal Investigator

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Maureen E Lyon, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Children's National Research Institute

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Georgetown University Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Children's National Medical Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Institute for Clinical Research, Inc. (Affiliated with Department of Veterans Affairs Medical Center of Washington, DC)

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

MedStar Health Research Institute/Washington Hospital Center

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

George Washington University

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Kimmel AL, Wang J, Scott RK, Briggs L, Lyon ME. FAmily CEntered (FACE) advance care planning: Study design and methods for a patient-centered communication and decision-making intervention for patients with HIV/AIDS and their surrogate decision-makers. Contemp Clin Trials. 2015 Jul;43:172-8. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2015.06.003. Epub 2015 Jun 2.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 26044463 (View on PubMed)

Lyon ME, Squires L, D'Angelo LJ, Benator D, Scott RK, Greenberg IH, Tanjutco P, Turner MM, Weixel TE, Cheng YI, Wang J. FAmily-CEntered (FACE) Advance Care Planning Among African-American and Non-African-American Adults Living With HIV in Washington, DC: A Randomized Controlled Trial to Increase Documentation and Health Equity. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Mar;57(3):607-616. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2018.11.014. Epub 2018 Nov 23.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30472318 (View on PubMed)

Curtin KB, Cheng YI, Wang J, Scott RK, Squires L, Benator DA, Lyon ME; Palliative Care Consortiums. Quality of life of persons living with HIV and congruence with surrogate decision-makers. Qual Life Res. 2019 Jan;28(1):47-56. doi: 10.1007/s11136-018-2002-5. Epub 2018 Sep 15.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 30219937 (View on PubMed)

Lyon ME, Squires L, Scott RK, Benator D, Briggs L, Greenberg I, D'Angelo LJ, Cheng YI, Wang J. Effect of FAmily CEntered (FACE(R)) Advance Care Planning on Longitudinal Congruence in End-of-Life Treatment Preferences: A Randomized Clinical Trial. AIDS Behav. 2020 Dec;24(12):3359-3375. doi: 10.1007/s10461-020-02909-y.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 32399799 (View on PubMed)

Grill KB, Wang J, Cheng YI, Lyon ME. The Role of Religiousness and Spirituality in Health-related Quality of Life of Persons Living with HIV: A Latent Class Analysis. Psycholog Relig Spiritual. 2020 Nov;12(4):494-504. doi: 10.1037/rel0000301. Epub 2020 Jan 30.

Reference Type RESULT
PMID: 33777311 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1R01NR01405201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Promoting Aging and Thriving With HIV
NCT07192419 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION NA