Routine Prescription Feedback and Peer Comparison to Lower Antibiotic Prescriptions in Primary Care
NCT ID: NCT01773824
Last Updated: 2016-05-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
2900 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-10-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
CMO Letter to Reduce Unnecessary Antibiotic Prescribing and Broad Spectrum Prescribing Winter 2018-9
NCT03862794
Providing Antibiotic Prescribing Feedback to Primary Care Physicians: The Ontario Program To Improve AntiMicrobial USE
NCT03776383
Optimizing Antibiotics Prescription
NCT06436690
Better Antibiotic Prescribing Through Action Research
NCT03082521
Peer Comparison Feedback As An Antimicrobial Prescribing Intervention To General Medicine Specialists
NCT07189364
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Aim: To evaluate the effect of a continuous postal and web-based feedback and peer comparison system of individual antibiotic prescription rates on the prescription behaviour of primary care physicians in Switzerland.
Design: Randomized, controlled, pragmatic intervention trial. Setting: Primary care providers of Switzerland above the median of antibiotic prescription rates.
Population: Primary care physicians caring for patients enlisted with social health insurance companies that provide invoice data to the SANTÉSUISSE DATENPOOL AND TARIFPOOL.
Endpoints: Primary endpoint: Prescription rate of antibiotics as defined daily doses (DDD) per 100 consultations at 12 and 24 months. Secondary endpoints: Costs-savings from the intervention, acceptability of the program, percentage of prescriptions fulfilling disease-specific quality indicators for outpatient antibiotic criteria by the European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC).
Intervention: Quarterly postal and electronic feedback for 24 months on the crude number of antibiotics prescribed, a population adjusted benchmark-profile in comparison to other primary care physicians, and evidence-based guidelines for the use of antibiotics in primary care. Physicians in the control group receive no information.
Variables and measurement: Rates of antibiotic prescriptions overall and per drug class (DDD), cost of prescribed drugs and the intervention program; number of web-application logins and participation cancellations, and - in a sub-sample - number of prescriptions fulfilling disease-specific quality indicators for outpatient antibiotic criteria (ESAC).
Expected results: We expect a 5% reduction of antibiotic prescription rates between the intervention and control groups after 12 months with an assumed participation rate (at least one web-access) and return of acceptance questionnaire of 30%. We expect that the intervention program will be cost-saving. ESAC quality indicators will be a useful tool for monitoring the quality of antibiotic prescription in ambulatory care in Switzerland.
Analyses: Analysis will be done by intention to treat principles. We will use linear regression analysis to determine the difference in antibiotic prescriptions between the intervention and the control group with appropriate adjustment for the case mix of patient populations and self-dispensation. Based on outpatient data of 2009 from the Helsana insurance and conservative effect estimates a sample-size of 1427 physicians each for the intervention and control group is planned.
Significance: This trial will investigate if a repeated feedback system results in a long-term reduction of antibiotic prescription practices. In addition, the feasibility of a web-based interface as communication tool to primary care physicians will be assessed. If effective, the system could be easily employed for other interventions as well.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
HEALTH_SERVICES_RESEARCH
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
No feedback
Physicians in the control group will only be monitored for their antibiotic prescription rates (Physicians are unaware of the trial).
No Feedback
Physicians in the control group will only be monitored for their antibiotic prescription rates (Physicians are unaware of the trial)
Antibiotic prescription feedback
Physicians receive quarterly electronic feedback on their antibiotic prescriptions
Antibiotic prescription feedback
Monthly postal and electronic feedback on antibiotic prescription rates
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Antibiotic prescription feedback
Monthly postal and electronic feedback on antibiotic prescription rates
No Feedback
Physicians in the control group will only be monitored for their antibiotic prescription rates (Physicians are unaware of the trial)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* At least 100 patients enlisted with the specified social health insurance providers (SANTÉSUISSE DATENPOOL AND TARIFPOOL). (to avoid classifying physicians as high prescribers who only see a small number of patients and describe antibiotics to many of them)
* Prescription-rates of antibiotics (DDD per 100 consultations) - that are prescribed to patients enlisted with the specified social health insurance providers (SANTÉSUISSE TARIFPOOL)
* are in the upper median of the prescription number distribution in the year prior to the start of the trial.
Exclusion Criteria
* Physicians working in institutions without own but with institutional ZSR NUMBER (ambulatory care facilities of University Hospitals, permanence, practices or Health Maintenance Organisation (HMO) with group ZSR number).
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Swiss National Science Foundation
OTHER
University Hospital, Basel, Switzerland
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Heiner C Bucher, Prof Dr med
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Basel Institute for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University Hospital Basel
Andreas Widmer, Prof Dr med
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Klinik für Infektiologie und Spitalhygiene, University Hospital Basel
Andreas Zeller, PD Dr med
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut für Hausarztmedizin, University of Basel
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Switzerland
Basel, , Switzerland
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hemkens LG, Saccilotto R, Reyes SL, Glinz D, Zumbrunn T, Grolimund O, Gloy V, Raatz H, Widmer A, Zeller A, Bucher HC. Personalized Prescription Feedback Using Routinely Collected Data to Reduce Antibiotic Use in Primary Care: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA Intern Med. 2017 Feb 1;177(2):176-183. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2016.8040.
Hemkens LG, Saccilotto R, Reyes SL, Glinz D, Zumbrunn T, Grolimund O, Gloy V, Raatz H, Widmer A, Zeller A, Bucher HC. Personalized prescription feedback to reduce antibiotic overuse in primary care: rationale and design of a nationwide pragmatic randomized trial. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Aug 17;16:421. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1739-0.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Institut für Hausarztmedizin der Universität Basel
Swiss Society for Nosocomial Infections
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
USB-2012-074
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.