Evaluation of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems With Blood Samples From Neonates
NCT ID: NCT01756274
Last Updated: 2017-02-15
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
162 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-12-31
2013-02-28
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Performance of CONTOUR NEXT® and CONTOUR PLUS ELITE® BGMS in Neonates Using Capillary Blood Samples
NCT05467345
Evaluation of Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems
NCT01699763
Evaluation of Blood Glucose Meter Systems
NCT01714232
Performance Evaluation of an Investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System
NCT01598610
Evaluation of an Ascensia Diabetes Care ONYX PLUS Investigational Blood Glucose Monitoring System
NCT02371876
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Neonates 'Left-over' Blood Samples
Blood samples used in this study were 'left-over samples'. The blood samples were from heel sticks of neonates, collected (into a tube) and sent to the laboratory. Two left-over samples could be obtained from a single neonate. Laboratory professionals tested the BG concentration using three Bayer Blood Glucose Monitoring Systems (BGMS): Contour® NEXT BGMS, Contour® PLUS BGMS, and Contour® Next EZ BGMS.
Contour® NEXT BGMS
Lab professionals tested the BG concentration using Contour® NEXT BGMS (Blood Glucose Monitoring System). All meter BG results were compared with capillary plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method, Cobas® 6000 instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).
Contour® PLUS BGMS
Lab professionals tested the BG concentration using Contour® PLUS BGMS (Blood Glucose Monitoring System). All meter BG results were compared with capillary plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method, Cobas® 6000 instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).
Contour® Next EZ BGMS
Lab professionals tested the BG concentration using Contour® Next EZ BGMS (Blood Glucose Monitoring System). All meter BG results were compared with plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method, Cobas® 6000 instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Contour® NEXT BGMS
Lab professionals tested the BG concentration using Contour® NEXT BGMS (Blood Glucose Monitoring System). All meter BG results were compared with capillary plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method, Cobas® 6000 instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).
Contour® PLUS BGMS
Lab professionals tested the BG concentration using Contour® PLUS BGMS (Blood Glucose Monitoring System). All meter BG results were compared with capillary plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method, Cobas® 6000 instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).
Contour® Next EZ BGMS
Lab professionals tested the BG concentration using Contour® Next EZ BGMS (Blood Glucose Monitoring System). All meter BG results were compared with plasma results obtained with a reference laboratory glucose method, Cobas® 6000 instrument (Roche Diagnostics Corp., Indianapolis, IN).
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* A portion of the samples (approximately 10%) will be from subjects \<24 hours old.
* A portion of the samples (at least 10%) will be from subjects in the NICU.
* Sample blood volume must be sufficient to complete investigational testing in addition to prescribed testing.
Exclusion Criteria
30 Days
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ascensia Diabetes Care
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Dennis J Dietzen, PhD, DABCC
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Washington University School of Medicine
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
CTD-2010-009-03
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.