REperfusion Facilitated by LOcal Adjunctive Therapy in ST-elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT ID: NCT01747174
Last Updated: 2015-06-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
247 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-10-31
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Prevention of Coronary Slow Flow or No-Reflow During EPCI in Patients With Acute STEMI
NCT03406832
THE REOPEN-AMI STUDY - Intracoronary Nitroprusside Versus Adenosine in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT00590070
Upfront Premedication For Reduction of Microvascular Obstruction and No-reflow in Treating ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
NCT05393557
Adenosine's Effect on STunning Resolution in Acute Myocardial Infarction
NCT05014061
Myocardial Protection With Adenosine During Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Pts With STEMI
NCT00781404
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Although P-PCI delivered quickly is more effective than thrombolysis, the efficacy of this, essentially mechanical, technique is limited by the unpredictable phenomenon of no-reflow and the under-stated lesser degrees of MVO. As more UK centres adopt P-PCI the dilemma of how to attenuate MVO will remain. Currently there is no consensus on the optimal management to prevent or attenuate MVO particularly when thrombus laden lesions are treated with P-PCI.
There is divergent clinical practice, even within institutions, in the UK and worldwide. This is because there is no solid evidence base to inform clinicians. The current options for interventional cardiologists are:
1. Routinely aspirate thrombus and give IC vasodilator during the intervention but only in high burden thrombus formation lesions.
2. Perform a standard P-PCI only and then give IV vasodilator if angiographic no-reflow develops.
3. Routinely consider that angiographically silent MVO (i.e a grade below true "no-reflow") may have important impact on infarct size and clinical outcome and treat prophylactically.
Few if any clinicians follow this thinking. Indeed, it appears impossible to predict the incidence of (no-reflow/MVO) from the presenting angiogram (pre- or post- wire or balloon) and it can be argued that irrespective of thrombus burden it would be better to undertake prophylactic treatment in all patients, following the use of aspiration catheter, with delivery of agents able, in theory at least, to reduce (angiographically undetectable) MVO. Several studies of IC adenosine or SNP have shown favourable effects in attenuating MVO. However, the size of effect with either drug and whether indeed there is a difference between them in reducing MVO and infarct size is undetermined.
The objectives of our proposed study are to determine:
1. Whether adjunctive pharmaco-therapy at time of P-PCI and following thrombus aspiration, reduces CMR-determined MVO and infarct size.
2. Whether there is a difference between adenosine and SNP in reducing CMR-detected MVO and infarct size, both given selectively and distally via a thrombus aspiration catheter or a coronary microcatheter.
3. The correlation of angiographic, including the recently designed computer-assisted myocardial blush quantification 'Quantitative Blush Evaluator'(QuBE), and other myocardial perfusion markers, with CMR detected MVO and infarct size, as well as with clinical outcome (MACE) at 30 days.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Std PCI + Intra-coronary (IC) Adenosine
IC Adenosine in to IRA (following thrombus aspiration) with further dose via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
IC Adenosine
IC Adenosine 1mg injected distally via micro-catheter in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further dose (1mg if IRA is RCA otherwise 2mg) via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
Standard PCI
PCI procedure with thrombectomy (via aspiration catheter) and bivalirudin given as standard.
Std PCI + IC Sodium Nitroprusside (SNP)
IC SNP in to IRA (following thrombus aspiration) with further dose via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP)
IC SNP 250mcg injected distally via micro-catheter distally in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further 250 mcg dose delivered via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
Standard PCI
PCI procedure with thrombectomy (via aspiration catheter) and bivalirudin given as standard.
Std PCI
Standard PCI only
Standard PCI
PCI procedure with thrombectomy (via aspiration catheter) and bivalirudin given as standard.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
IC Adenosine
IC Adenosine 1mg injected distally via micro-catheter in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further dose (1mg if IRA is RCA otherwise 2mg) via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
IC Sodium nitroprusside (SNP)
IC SNP 250mcg injected distally via micro-catheter distally in to IRA following thrombus aspiration with further 250 mcg dose delivered via guide catheter following coronary stent deployment.
Standard PCI
PCI procedure with thrombectomy (via aspiration catheter) and bivalirudin given as standard.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Informed ASSENT (verbal consent) prior to angiography.
* STEMI ≤ 6 hrs of symptom onset, requiring primary reperfusion by PCI.
* Single-vessel coronary artery disease (non culprit disease ≤70% stenosis at angiography)
* TIMI flow 0/I at angiography.
Exclusion Criteria
* SBP ≤ 90mmHg
* Cardiogenic Shock
* Previous Q wave myocardial infarction
* Culprit lesion not identified or located in a by-pass graft
* Stent thrombosis.
* Left main disease.
* Known severe asthma.
* Known stage 4 or 5 chronic kidney disease (eGFR\<30ml/min).
* Pregnancy.
Notes:
* \*\* Absolute contra-indication to CMR (Pacemaker, ICD, intra-cranial metal clips).
* \*\*\* Contraindications to Adenosine (known hypersensitivity to Adenosine, sick sinus syndrome, second or third degree atrio-ventricular block - except in patients with functioning artificial pacemaker, long QT syndrome has been defined as QTc \> 450 ms at baseline). ECG will be undertaken just after the first dose of the study drug and QT/QTc will be recorded and compared to the baseline. If the QTc recorded after the first dose of the study drug exceeds 450ms or there is an increase in the QT/QTc of \> 60 ms from baseline, the second dose will be abandoned and this will be recorded.
* \*\*\*\* Contraindications to SNP (known hypersensitivity to SNP, compensatory hypertension - as may be seen in arteriovenous shunts or coarctation of the aorta, high output failure, congenital optic atrophy or tobacco amblyopia).
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University Hospitals, Leicester
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anthony H Gershlick, MBBS, FRCP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Leicester
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Glenfield Hospital
Leicester, Leicestershire, United Kingdom
Freeman Hospital
Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom
University Hospital
Coventry, West Midlands, United Kingdom
Leeds General Infirmary
Leeds, West Yorkshire, United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Nazir SA, McCann GP, Greenwood JP, Kunadian V, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Blackman DJ, Been M, Abrams KR, Shipley L, Wilcox R, Adgey AA, Gershlick AH. Strategies to attenuate micro-vascular obstruction during P-PCI: the randomized reperfusion facilitated by local adjunctive therapy in ST-elevation myocardial infarction trial. Eur Heart J. 2016 Jun 21;37(24):1910-9. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehw136. Epub 2016 May 4.
Nazir SA, Khan JN, Mahmoud IZ, Greenwood JP, Blackman DJ, Kunadian V, Been M, Abrams KR, Wilcox R, Adgey AA, McCann GP, Gershlick AH. The REFLO-STEMI trial comparing intracoronary adenosine, sodium nitroprusside and standard therapy for the attenuation of infarct size and microvascular obstruction during primary percutaneous coronary intervention: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial. Trials. 2014 Sep 25;15:371. doi: 10.1186/1745-6215-15-371.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-023211-34
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
09/150/28
Identifier Type: OTHER_GRANT
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CLRN 53469
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.