Phase II Study of the Effects of rhPDGF-BB Injection on Lateral Epicondylitis

NCT ID: NCT01746420

Last Updated: 2019-07-02

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-12-12

Study Completion Date

2014-10-21

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to determine whether recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor (rhPDGF-BB) Injection is effective in the treatment of lateral epicondylitis (tennis elbow).

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Methodology: Randomized, single ascending dose, double-blinded, placebo controlled, multi-center study

Study Center(s): 6

Number of Subjects: 100

Diagnosis and Main Inclusion Criteria: Lateral epicondylitis; male and female subjects 21 -80 years of age

Study Drug, Dose, Regimen:

Dose A: sodium acetate buffer alone - placebo control Dose B: sodium acetate buffer + 0.45 mg rhPDGF-BB Dose C: sodium acetate buffer + 0.75 mg rhPDGF-BB Dose D: sodium acetate buffer + 1.5 mg rhPDGF-BB Dose E: sodium acetate buffer + 3.0 mg rhPDGF-BB

Duration and Route of Administration: Single administration dose by injection into the extensor carpi radialis brevis (ECRB)

Duration of Follow-up: 24 weeks (6 months) post-operative follow-up

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Lateral Epicondylitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

DOUBLE

Participants Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Placebo Control

Dose A - sodium acetate buffer (0 mg rhPDGF-BB)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

sodium acetate buffer (0 mg rhPDGF-BB)

0.45 mg rhPDGF-BB

Dose B - sodium acetate buffer + 0.45 mg rhPDGF-BB

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rhPDGF-BB Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparison of placebo control (0 mg rhPDGF-BB) and different dosages (0.45, 0.75, 1.5, and 3.0 mg) of rhPDGF-BB Injection administered through a one-time injection

0.75 mg rhPDGF-BB

Dose C - sodium acetate buffer + 0.75 mg rhPDGF-BB

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rhPDGF-BB Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparison of placebo control (0 mg rhPDGF-BB) and different dosages (0.45, 0.75, 1.5, and 3.0 mg) of rhPDGF-BB Injection administered through a one-time injection

1.5 mg rhPDGF-BB

Dose D - sodium acetate buffer + 1.5 mg rhPDGF-BB

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rhPDGF-BB Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparison of placebo control (0 mg rhPDGF-BB) and different dosages (0.45, 0.75, 1.5, and 3.0 mg) of rhPDGF-BB Injection administered through a one-time injection

3.0 mg rhPDGF-BB

Dose E - sodium acetate buffer + 3.0 mg rhPDGF-BB

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

rhPDGF-BB Injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Comparison of placebo control (0 mg rhPDGF-BB) and different dosages (0.45, 0.75, 1.5, and 3.0 mg) of rhPDGF-BB Injection administered through a one-time injection

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

rhPDGF-BB Injection

Comparison of placebo control (0 mg rhPDGF-BB) and different dosages (0.45, 0.75, 1.5, and 3.0 mg) of rhPDGF-BB Injection administered through a one-time injection

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo

sodium acetate buffer (0 mg rhPDGF-BB)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Subject has signed the Institutional Review Board (IRB) approved Informed Consent Form specific to this study prior to enrollment
2. Subject has a clinical diagnosis of lateral epicondylitis
3. Subject's symptoms can be reproduced with resisted supination or wrist dorsiflexion
4. Subject's symptoms have persisted for at least 3 months despite conservative treatment that includes one or combinations of:

1. Physical therapy
2. Splinting
3. Nonsteroidal antiinflammatory drug (NSAID)
4. Corticosteroid injection
5. Subject is independent, ambulatory, and can comply with all post-injection evaluations and visits
6. Subject is 21-80 years of age and considered to be skeletally mature

Exclusion Criteria

1. Subject has undergone previous corticosteroid injection therapy to the effected elbow in less than three months prior to enrollment
2. Subject has received previous Platelet Rich Plasma (PRP) injection to the affected elbow
3. Subject is deemed to require a corticosteroid injection into the affected elbow during the course of the study
4. Subject uses chronic medications known to affect the skeleton (e.g. glucocorticoid usage \>10mg/day)
5. Subject has undergone surgical intervention to the affected elbow for the treatment of lateral epicondylitis
6. Subject has a positive medical history of any of the following:

1. medial epicondylitis
2. radial tunnel syndrome
3. carpal tunnel syndrome
4. septic or gouty arthritis
5. cervical radiculopathy
6. trauma to the affected elbow within the past 6 weeks
7. neuromuscular or musculoskeletal deficiency, which limits the ability to perform functional measurement (e.g. grip strength test)
7. Subject currently has an acute infection at the injection site
8. Subject has tested positive or been treated for a malignancy in the past or is suspected of having a malignancy or are currently undergoing radio- or chemotherapy treatment for a malignancy anywhere in the body, whether adjacent to or distant from the proposed rhPDGF-BB Injection treatment site
9. Subject is physically or mentally compromised (e.g. currently being treated for a psychiatric disorder, senile dementia, Alzheimer's disease, etc.) to the extent that the Investigator judges the subject to be unable or unlikely to remain compliant
10. Subject has an allergy to yeast-derived products
11. Subject has received an investigational therapy or approved therapy for investigational use within 30 days of injection procedure or during the follow-up phase of this study
12. Subject is a prisoner, or is known or suspected to be transient
13. Subject's condition represents a worker's compensation case
14. Subject is currently involved in a health-related litigation procedure
15. Subject has documented evidence of a history (e.g. liver testing) of drug/alcohol abuse within the 12 months prior to screening for study entry
16. Subject is pregnant, or able to become pregnant but not practicing a medically-accepted form of birth control, and/or intending to become pregnant during this study period
Minimum Eligible Age

21 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

BioMimetic Therapeutics

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Edward Akelman, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Brown University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Arizona Research Center

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Tucson Orthopaedic Institute

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

NEA Baptist Clinic

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Coastal Orthopedics & Sports Medicine

Bradenton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Foundation for Orthopaedic Research and Education

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

OrthoCarolina

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

BMTI-2010-02

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.