Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
1340 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2013-03-31
2018-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
This is a prospective large multicenter study. All patients with a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center. Then, patients will undergo a routine pelvic MR imaging. Prospectively, one senior and one junior radiologists independently analyze the different MR criteria to characterize adnexal masses. The MR report will be issued as standard and the patient will be managed accordingly. Then, the reader will classify the mass using ADNEXMR SCORING system. The classification will be compared to the reference standard as defined below. The reproducibility of the classification will be tested between the junior and the senior radiologist. After anonymisation, images will be analyzed by another senior radiologist of another center blinded from any clinical or ultrasonographical data and correlated with the reference standard.
Reference standard: Reference standard will be surgical procedure with histology or standard clinical follow-up depending on most appropriate routine practice.
Sample size: The sample size was computed to ensure a power of at least 90% (with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%) to conclude that SCORE 2 and 3 and SCORE 4 and 5 would have a different PPV. It would thus be necessary to have at least 569 patients classified as SCORE 2, 259 as SCORE 3, 52 as SCORE 4 and 51 as SCORE 5 (18). Given the prevalences, and assuming 6% of patients would be classified, as SCORE 1 and 10% would be lost to follow-up, 1340 patients will be included in this study to insure a probability of at least 95% to obtain the aforementioned number of patients in each score category. The inclusion period will last 18 months (extension for a period of 12 months) and monitoring will continue for 2 years.
Thomassin Naggara I., et al. Development and preliminary validation of an MRI Scoring system for Adnexal Masses. Radiology 2013, May;267(2):432-43.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Added Value of O-RADS in Evaluation of Ovarian Lesions
NCT04579575
Prospective RegIstration Of the peRformance of the IoTa ADNEX Model in Dutch gYnaecological Practice
NCT06103916
Value of Advanced MRI Techniques in the Assessment of Endometriosis
NCT06481982
SUPerficial ENDometriosis In Magnetic Resonance Imaging
NCT06195280
Developing an US-MRI Biomarker Fusion Model for Endometriosis
NCT04974710
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient ≥ 18 years old
* With indeterminate ultrasonographic adnexal mass
* Informed consent
Non inclusion Criteria
* Pregnant women
* Pacemaker, ferromagnetic materials, or foreign body at risk of mobilization
* Intolerance to iodinated or gadolinium contrast agents, or severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m²).
Objectives • Primary objective: Evaluate if ADNEXMR SCORING system is relevant for reporting pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses in an external prospective multicenter study
• Secondary objectives and endpoints: Evaluate
1. The potential impact of applying the score to the therapeutic strategy, in particular to measure the possible reduction in oncologic surgery in benign cases
2. If ADNEXMR SCORING system improves reproducibility of MR report for characterization of adnexal masses
3. If ADNEXMR SCORING system is as accurate if the radiologist is blinded from any clinical and ultrasonographic data
Main endpoint Joint analysis of true negative and false negative rates according to ADNEXMR SCORING system as compared to the histological results (or follow-up outcome, see "reference standard", below) with an evaluation of the sensitivity and the specificity of the score
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* With sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass
* Informed consent
Exclusion Criteria
* Pacemaker, ferromagnetic materials, or foreign body at risk of mobilization or any other contra-indication to MR imaging.
* Intolerance to iodinated or gadolinium contrast agents, or severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m²).
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Société d'Imagerie de la Femme
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara
Full Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, MD, PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie
Andrea Rockall, MD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Imperial College of London
Marc Bazot, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Institute of Radiology
Salzburg, , Austria
University Hospital Dubrav
Zagreb, , Croatia
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, , France
Hopital de la Timone
Marseille, , France
Institut Paoli Calmettes
Marseille, , France
Hopital de Lapeyronie
Montpellier, , France
Tenon Hospital
Paris, , France
Centre imagerie Pyramides
Paris, , France
Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou
Paris, , France
Hopital Lariboisière
Paris, , France
Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière
Paris, , France
Institut Curie - Huguenin
Paris, , France
Hopital de Valenciennes
Valenciennes, , France
Institut Gustave Roussy
Villejuif, , France
Umberto I hospital Sapienza
Roma, , Italy
Hospital da Luz
Lisbon, , Portugal
Instituto Portuges de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil
Lisbon, , Portugal
Clinical Center of Vojvodine
Novi Sad, , Serbia
University Hodpital Dubrav
Baden, , Switzerland
Addenbrokes hospital
Cambridge, , United Kingdom
Barts Health NHS trust
London, , United Kingdom
Imperial College Healthcare
London, , United Kingdom
University College London
London, , United Kingdom
Steeping Hill hospital
Stockport, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wengert GJ, Dabi Y, Kermarrec E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Poncelet E, Porcher R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall AG; EURAD Study Group. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment. Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):566-575. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210342. Epub 2022 Mar 1.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SIFEM-2013-1
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.