EURAD-MR Classification : European Multicenter Study

NCT ID: NCT01738789

Last Updated: 2017-07-26

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Total Enrollment

1340 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-03-31

Study Completion Date

2018-03-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

An adnexal mass is the most common indication for gynaecological surgery . Pre operative characterization is crucial and a scoring system would be useful to standardize the imaging report and thus, improve patient management. Recently, our center developed the first MR scoring system named ADNEXMR SCORING system in a retrospective study which is accurate and reproducible (1). Our objectives are to perform an external prospective validation of this scoring system, to evaluate its potential impact on therapeutic strategy and to test its reproducibility.

This is a prospective large multicenter study. All patients with a sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center. Then, patients will undergo a routine pelvic MR imaging. Prospectively, one senior and one junior radiologists independently analyze the different MR criteria to characterize adnexal masses. The MR report will be issued as standard and the patient will be managed accordingly. Then, the reader will classify the mass using ADNEXMR SCORING system. The classification will be compared to the reference standard as defined below. The reproducibility of the classification will be tested between the junior and the senior radiologist. After anonymisation, images will be analyzed by another senior radiologist of another center blinded from any clinical or ultrasonographical data and correlated with the reference standard.

Reference standard: Reference standard will be surgical procedure with histology or standard clinical follow-up depending on most appropriate routine practice.

Sample size: The sample size was computed to ensure a power of at least 90% (with a two-sided type I error rate of 5%) to conclude that SCORE 2 and 3 and SCORE 4 and 5 would have a different PPV. It would thus be necessary to have at least 569 patients classified as SCORE 2, 259 as SCORE 3, 52 as SCORE 4 and 51 as SCORE 5 (18). Given the prevalences, and assuming 6% of patients would be classified, as SCORE 1 and 10% would be lost to follow-up, 1340 patients will be included in this study to insure a probability of at least 95% to obtain the aforementioned number of patients in each score category. The inclusion period will last 18 months (extension for a period of 12 months) and monitoring will continue for 2 years.

Thomassin Naggara I., et al. Development and preliminary validation of an MRI Scoring system for Adnexal Masses. Radiology 2013, May;267(2):432-43.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

All patients with an indeterminate ultrasonographically adnexal mass referred for MR imaging will be consecutively included in each center.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient ≥ 18 years old
* With indeterminate ultrasonographic adnexal mass
* Informed consent

Non inclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women
* Pacemaker, ferromagnetic materials, or foreign body at risk of mobilization
* Intolerance to iodinated or gadolinium contrast agents, or severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m²).

Objectives • Primary objective: Evaluate if ADNEXMR SCORING system is relevant for reporting pelvic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) examinations performed for characterization of sonographically indeterminate adnexal masses in an external prospective multicenter study

• Secondary objectives and endpoints: Evaluate

1. The potential impact of applying the score to the therapeutic strategy, in particular to measure the possible reduction in oncologic surgery in benign cases
2. If ADNEXMR SCORING system improves reproducibility of MR report for characterization of adnexal masses
3. If ADNEXMR SCORING system is as accurate if the radiologist is blinded from any clinical and ultrasonographic data

Main endpoint Joint analysis of true negative and false negative rates according to ADNEXMR SCORING system as compared to the histological results (or follow-up outcome, see "reference standard", below) with an evaluation of the sensitivity and the specificity of the score

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ovarian Tumor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Patient ≥ 18 years old
* With sonographically indeterminate adnexal mass
* Informed consent

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnant women (relative contra indication for gadolinium injection)
* Pacemaker, ferromagnetic materials, or foreign body at risk of mobilization or any other contra-indication to MR imaging.
* Intolerance to iodinated or gadolinium contrast agents, or severe renal insufficiency (GFR \<30 ml/min/1.73m²).
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Société d'Imagerie de la Femme

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara

Full Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Isabelle Thomassin-Naggara, MD, PhD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Assistance Publique des Hopitaux de Paris, Université Pierre et Marie Curie

Andrea Rockall, MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Imperial College of London

Marc Bazot, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

University Institute of Radiology

Salzburg, , Austria

Site Status

University Hospital Dubrav

Zagreb, , Croatia

Site Status

Centre Oscar Lambret

Lille, , France

Site Status

Hopital de la Timone

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Institut Paoli Calmettes

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Hopital de Lapeyronie

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Tenon Hospital

Paris, , France

Site Status

Centre imagerie Pyramides

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Européen Georges Pompidou

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital Lariboisière

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hôpital de la Pitié-Salpétrière

Paris, , France

Site Status

Institut Curie - Huguenin

Paris, , France

Site Status

Hopital de Valenciennes

Valenciennes, , France

Site Status

Institut Gustave Roussy

Villejuif, , France

Site Status

Umberto I hospital Sapienza

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Hospital da Luz

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Instituto Portuges de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Clinical Center of Vojvodine

Novi Sad, , Serbia

Site Status

University Hodpital Dubrav

Baden, , Switzerland

Site Status

Addenbrokes hospital

Cambridge, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Barts Health NHS trust

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Imperial College Healthcare

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

University College London

London, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Steeping Hill hospital

Stockport, , United Kingdom

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria Croatia France Italy Portugal Serbia Switzerland United Kingdom

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Wengert GJ, Dabi Y, Kermarrec E, Jalaguier-Coudray A, Poncelet E, Porcher R, Thomassin-Naggara I, Rockall AG; EURAD Study Group. O-RADS MRI Classification of Indeterminate Adnexal Lesions: Time-Intensity Curve Analysis Is Better Than Visual Assessment. Radiology. 2022 Jun;303(3):566-575. doi: 10.1148/radiol.210342. Epub 2022 Mar 1.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 35230183 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SIFEM-2013-1

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

ENDOMETRIOSIS - MRI
NCT05779462 RECRUITING
Adenomyosis Imaging,Histo, Clinical
NCT07237932 ENROLLING_BY_INVITATION