Study Investigating the Safety and Efficacy of HP802-247 in the Treatment of Venous Leg Ulcers >12 cm2 to ≤ 36 cm2

NCT ID: NCT01737762

Last Updated: 2017-07-26

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

155 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2015-11-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This study is being done to find out if an investigational product called HP802-247 can help people with venous leg ulcers. Investigational means that HP802-247 has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

At least 250 subjects will participate. The study is going to be conducted in approximately 50 sites in the United States and Canada.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This research is being done to compare the efficacy of HP802-247 plus compression therapy against Vehicle plus compression therapy in achieving complete wound closure over the 16-week treatment period. Vehicle looks the same as HP802-247 but contains no cells. Target wound status is evaluated at each study visit (closed, open, reopened). At wound closure or completion of treatment all subject will enter an observational safety followed up period which ends at one year after initial exposure to test article.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Venous Leg Ulcers

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

HP802-247

HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution \& thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 solution) containing 0.5 x 106 cells per mL every 14 days.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

HP802-247

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution \& thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 x106 cells per mL every 14 days.

Vehicle

Vehicle Control(fibrinogen solution \& thrombin solution without cells)

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Vehicle

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

HP802-247

HP802-247 (fibrinogen solution \& thrombin solution containing living, irradiated, growth arrested keratinocytes and fibroblasts) 260 µL (130 µL, one spray, of each solution) containing 0.5 x106 cells per mL every 14 days.

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Vehicle

Intervention Type BIOLOGICAL

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Provide informed consent.
* Age ≥ 18 years and of either sex.
* Willing to comply with protocol instructions, including allowing all study assessments.
* Have a venous leg ulcer (VLU) between the knee and ankle (at or above the malleolus), with a surface area \>12 cm2 to ≤ 36 cm2
* Venous insufficiency confirmed by duplex Doppler ultrasound examination for valvular or venous incompetence.
* Arterial supply adequacy confirmed
* Target ulcer involves a full thickness skin loss, but WITHOUT exposure of tendon, muscle, or bone.
* Target ulcer duration ≥ 6 weeks but ≤ 104 weeks (24 months).
* Acceptable state of health and nutrition

Exclusion Criteria

* History of anaphylaxis, serum sickness, or erythema multiforme reaction to aprotinin, bovine serum albumin or bovine serum proteins, penicillin, streptomycin, amphotericin B.
* Prior diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus with elevated anti-DNA antibody titers, Buerger's disease (thromboangiitis obliterans), current diagnosis of vasculitis, or current diagnosis of claudication.
* Therapy with another investigational agent within thirty (30) days of Screening, or during the study.
* A target ulcer of non-venous etiologies (e.g., sickle cell anemia, necrobiosis lipoidica diabeticorum, pyoderma gangrenosum, vasculopathic or vasculitic).
* Documented history of osteomyelitis at the target wound location within 6 months preceding the Screening Visit.
* Refusal of or inability to tolerate compression therapy.
* Therapy of the target ulcer with autologous skin graft, Apligraf™, or Dermagraft™ within 30 days preceding the Screening Visit.
* History of cancer in the preceding 5 years (other than carcinoma in situ of the cervix or adequately treated non-melanoma skin cancers).
* Any prior exposure to HP802-247 or its vehicle.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Healthpoint

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Herbert B Slade, MD

Role: STUDY_CHAIR

Healthpoint

Tommy Lee, MSHS

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Healthpoint

Robert Kirsner, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Miami

William Marston, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of North Carolina

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Carlsbad, California, United States

Site Status

Castro Valley, California, United States

Site Status

Fair Oaks, California, United States

Site Status

Fresno, California, United States

Site Status

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Long Beach, California, United States

Site Status

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Sylmar, California, United States

Site Status

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States

Site Status

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Jacksonville, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Springfield, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Baltimore, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Saginaw, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Washington, Missouri, United States

Site Status

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Bayonne, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Hoboken, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

East Meadow, New York, United States

Site Status

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Chapel Hill, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Akron, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Willoughby, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Dunmore, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Knoxville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Fort Worth, Texas, United States

Site Status

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

London, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

San Juan, , Puerto Rico

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Canada Puerto Rico

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Marston WA, Ennis WJ, Lantis JC 2nd, Kirsner RS, Galiano RD, Vanscheidt W, Eming SA, Malka M, Cargill DI, Dickerson JE Jr, Slade HB; HP802-247 Study Group. Baseline factors affecting closure of venous leg ulcers. J Vasc Surg Venous Lymphat Disord. 2017 Nov;5(6):829-835.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.jvsv.2017.06.017.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 29037354 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

802-247-09-031

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Tissue Repair Gel in Venous Leg Ulcers (US)
NCT06707090 RECRUITING PHASE3