High Dose Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy in the Cervical Cancer With Metastatic Lymphadenopathies.

NCT ID: NCT01730651

Last Updated: 2020-09-16

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

55 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-07-13

Study Completion Date

2022-07-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This phase II study of high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy in the cervical cancer with metastatic lymphadenopathies at initial diagnosis

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Lymph node (LN) involvement in cervical cancer is a poor prognostic factor(1). Although lymph node evaluation is not a part of the International Federation of Gynecology and Obstetrics (FIGO) staging system(2), it is generally performed as one of the initial workup of patients with cervical cancer by use of modern imaging tools for accurate evaluation of the disease extent and possible treatment adjustment. Kidd et al reported the positron emission tomography with \[18F\] fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET)-positive lymph node rate is 47% at diagnosis in 560 patients. They also showed that within a stage, patients with PET-positive lymph nodes had significantly worse disease specific survival than those with PET-negative lymph nodes (p\<0.001)(3).

Historically, dose escalation to the pelvic or para-aortic metastatic lymphadenopathies was not given as much attention as primary uterine cervical lesion partly because of the expected increased risk of bowel toxicity with when conventional radiotherapy technique was used. Unlike for the head and neck cancer where intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) or tomotherapy was actively used for treatment of large lymphadenopathies and shown to produce improved disease control(4, 5) , there are few similar studies for cervical cancer. It is well known that more than 60 Gy10 2Gy equivalent dose (EQD2, α/β=10 Gy) is needed to control the gross tumor sized of 10 mm, containing 109 cells, according to the logarithmic cell killing(6). Theoretically, pelvic and para-aortic LNs (PAN) could not be controlled with the dose of 45-50 Gy10 EQD2, and we need to escalate the dose as much as possible with new radiation technology.

In the current is study, we evaluate the LNs control rate, toxicity rate, progression-free survival and overall survival in cervical cancer patients with lymphadenopathies and treated with high dose intensity modulated radiation therapy

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Cervical Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

NA

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Tomotherapy

1. Tomotherapy fraction size (Gy) = 0.4 x 진단 당시의 LN short diameter (cm) + 1.6 (pilot study range, 1.5-3.0 Gy)
2. Total dose(summation dose with 3D-CRT) (Gy10) (EQD2, α/β=10 Gy) = 5 x 진단 당시의 LN short diameter (cm) + 56 (pilot study range, 54.6-78.0 Gy)

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Tomotherapy

Intervention Type RADIATION

IMRT boost of gross LNs

1. Tomotherapy fraction size (Gy) = 0.4 x 진단 당시의 LN short diameter (cm) + 1.6 (pilot study range, 1.5-3.0 Gy)
2. Total dose(summation dose with 3D-CRT) (Gy10) (EQD2, α/β=10 Gy) = 5 x 진단 당시의 LN short diameter (cm) + 56 (pilot study range, 54.6-78.0 Gy)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Tomotherapy

IMRT boost of gross LNs

1. Tomotherapy fraction size (Gy) = 0.4 x 진단 당시의 LN short diameter (cm) + 1.6 (pilot study range, 1.5-3.0 Gy)
2. Total dose(summation dose with 3D-CRT) (Gy10) (EQD2, α/β=10 Gy) = 5 x 진단 당시의 LN short diameter (cm) + 56 (pilot study range, 54.6-78.0 Gy)

Intervention Type RADIATION

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

1. Patients (who have been adequately clinically staged) with primary, untreated, histologically confirmed carcinoma of the uterine cervix (including clear cell and small cell carcinoma), with metastatic lymphadenopathies (any of pelvis or PAN \>1.5 cm in short diameter, with/without biopsy proven inguinal lymph node \[ING\])
2. Patients with Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Performance Status of 0, 1, 2
3. Patients with adequate bone marrow function: absolute neutrophil count (ANC) greater than or equal to 1,500/mcl, platelets greater than or equal to 100,000/mcl at the beginning.
4. Patients with adequate renal function: creatinine equal to or less than 2.0 mg%.
5. Patients who have signed an approved informed consent and authorization

Exclusion Criteria

1. Patients with recurrent LN(s) which was(were) previously irradiated.
2. Patients who have diagnosis of other malignance tumors except papillary or follicular thyroid cancer or skin cancer
3. Patients with metastatic lymphadenopathies other than pelvis, PAN, ING (e.g. supraclavicular or mediastinal metastatic lymphadenopathy)
4. Patients with distant organ metastasis (e.g. bone, lung, brain…)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

FEMALE

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Keimyung University Dongsan Medical Center

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

National Cancer Center, Korea

OTHER_GOV

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Joo-Young Kim

PI

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Jooyoung Kim, M.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

National Cancer Center, Korea

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

National Cancer Center, Korea

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

National Cancer Center

Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

South Korea

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

NCCCTS 12-615

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

RT for Adenocarcinoma/Adenosquamous Carcinoma
NCT07153952 ACTIVE_NOT_RECRUITING PHASE1/PHASE2