Performance Comparison of Revaclear With Larger Dialyzer

NCT ID: NCT01722695

Last Updated: 2025-03-13

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

30 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-11-30

Study Completion Date

2012-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of the study is to show equivalent performance of the Revaclear dialyzer when compared to a dialyzer with larger membrane surface area.

Study design: open, randomized, cross-over, multicentric, controlled prospective

Medical devices: Revaclear 200 versus FX 60 or Revaclear 400 versus FX 100, depending on patient needs

Patients/sample size: 30 adult chronic hemodialysis patients

Treatment: Each patient will be treated by hemodialysis for one week (3 dialysis sessions) with Revaclear dialyzers and one week (3 dialysis sessions) with FX dialyzers.

Objectives: intraindividual comparison of dialysis dose; reduction rates and total removal of urea, phosphate, creatinine and ß2-microglobulin; albumin loss

Primary variable: dialysis dose Kt/V urea

Secondary variable: reduction rates and total removal of urea, phosphate, creatinine and ß2-microglobulin

Safety variable: albumin loss, blood count

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Renal Failure Chronic Requiring Hemodialysis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Revaclear followed by FX

Group Type OTHER

Dialyzer comparison

Intervention Type OTHER

Each patient is treated by hemodialysis for one week (3 sessions) with each dialyzer type (Revaclear or FX).

The order of dialyzers used will be randomly assigned to the patient at randomization.

FX followed by Revaclear

Group Type OTHER

Dialyzer comparison

Intervention Type OTHER

Each patient is treated by hemodialysis for one week (3 sessions) with each dialyzer type (Revaclear or FX).

The order of dialyzers used will be randomly assigned to the patient at randomization.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Dialyzer comparison

Each patient is treated by hemodialysis for one week (3 sessions) with each dialyzer type (Revaclear or FX).

The order of dialyzers used will be randomly assigned to the patient at randomization.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* chronic renal failure and stable treatment with hemodialysis or hemodiafiltration for at least 3 months
* patients aged 18 years or more
* written consent to participate in the study (informed consent)
* dialysis via native fistula or Gore-Tex graft capable of providing a blood flow rate of at least 300 mL/min

Exclusion Criteria

* single-needle dialysis
* pregnant and lactating women
* participation in other interventional studies less than 3 months prior to study start
* non-compliance with the dialysis prescription
* hematocrit less than 28%
* hospitalization
* antibiotic therapy
* active infection
* active cancer
* known positive serology for HIV, hepatitis B or C
* serious hemostasis disorders
* any comorbidity possibly conflicting with the study purpose or procedures
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Gambro Dialysatoren GmbH

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Baxter Healthcare Corporation

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role collaborator

Vantive Health LLC

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Alexander Rosenkranz, Prof.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Medical University Graz, Austria

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Dialyseinstitut Prim. Dr. W. Gießauf GmbH

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Medical University Graz

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Austria

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1499

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Clinical Trial of IntensiVE Dialysis
NCT00649298 COMPLETED PHASE4