Study of EVP-6124 (Alpha-7 nAChR) as an Adjunctive Pro-Cognitive Treatment in Schizophrenia Subjects on Chronic Stable Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy
NCT ID: NCT01714661
Last Updated: 2016-05-03
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
753 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-10-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of EVP-6124 (Alpha-7 nAChR) as an Adjunctive Pro-Cognitive Treatment in Schizophrenia Subjects on Chronic Stable Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy
NCT01716975
A 26-Week Extension Study of EVP-6124 (Alpha-7 nAChR) as an Adjunctive Pro-Cognitive Treatment in Schizophrenia Subjects on Chronic Stable Atypical Antipsychotic Therapy
NCT01714713
Safety and Cognitive Function Study of EVP-6124 in Patients With Schizophrenia
NCT00968851
Safety, Tolerability, and Pharmacokinetic Study of EVP-6124 in Patients With Schizophrenia
NCT01556763
Study to Assess the Safety, Tolerability, Pharmacokinetic (PK) and Pharmacodynamic (PD) Effects of EVP-6308 and the Potential of EVP-6308 to Affect the PK Properties of the Antipsychotic Regimen in Subjects With Schizophrenia Currently Receiving Stable Treatment With up to 2 Atypical Antipsychotics
NCT02037074
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
EVP-6124, low dose
low dose, Tablet, Once Daily, Day 1 through Day 182
EVP-6124
Arms 1, 2
EVP-6124, high dose
high dose, Tablet, Once Daily, Day 1 through Day 182
EVP-6124
Arms 1, 2
EVP-6124, Placebo
Placebo, Tablet, Once Daily, Day -14 through Day 182
Placebo
Arm 3
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
EVP-6124
Arms 1, 2
Placebo
Arm 3
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Signed informed consent, indicating that the subject understands the purpose of and procedures required for the study, before the initiation of any study specific procedures. Subjects who are unable to provide informed consent will not be included in the study.
* Resides in a stable living situation, according to the investigator's judgment, and must have an identified informant who should be consistent throughout the study. If possible, the informant should accompany the subject or be available for in person ratings at the screening, baseline (Day 1), and final study visits. In person informant ratings on all relevant study visits are preferred whenever possible. However, if the informant is not available for in person ratings, telephone interview is acceptable. The informant must be available for a telephone interview throughout the study at all visits. As long as both the informant visit and subject visit are within the study visit windows, it is not necessary that they occur on the same day. The informant must interact with the subject at least 2 times a week.
* Diagnosis of Schizophrenia of at least 3 years duration. This diagnosis can be established utilizing the SCID-I, direct clinical assessments, family, informants, and confirmation of diagnosis from clinical sources. These may include medical records, confirmation of diagnosis by treating clinician through telephone contact, or written confirmation from treating clinic. If the listed sources are not available, other sources of diagnostic confirmation may also be acceptable after discussion with the medical monitor.
* Treated with atypical antipsychotic drug (in any approved dosage form) other than Clozapine at a stable dose for at least 8 weeks prior to screening and be clinically stable; the subject must remain clinically stable (in the opinion of the principal investigator) through randomization. The use of up to 2 atypical antipsychotic drugs is permitted, as long as in the opinion of the investigator, the second medication is not required to control treatment-resistant or intractable psychotic symptoms. No subject will be washed off antipsychotic therapy to become eligible for this study.
* Schizophrenia clinical symptom burden severity defined by the following: a Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS) Conceptual Disorganization item score ≤ 4; and a BPRS Hallucinatory Behavior item score ≤ 5, or an Unusual Thought Content item score ≤ 5. Either Hallucinatory Behavior or Unusual Thought Content, but not both, may have a score of 6 (but not \> 6).
* Simpson-Angus Scale (SAS) total score ≤ 6
* Calgary Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) total score ≤ 10
* General health status acceptable for participation in a 26-week clinical study
* Fertile, sexually active subjects (men and women) must use an effective method of contraception during the study
* Fluency (oral and written) in the language in which the standardized tests will be administered
* The ability to refrain from using any tobacco or other nicotine-containing products for at least 30 minutes before any cognitive testing
Exclusion Criteria
* Participation in another therapeutic (medication administration) clinical study within the past 2 months.
* Psychiatric hospitalization or incarcerations due to breakthrough symptoms or acute exacerbations for a period of 3 months before screening. Subjects with a recent "social" hospitalization or incarceration may be entered into screening after consultation with the medical monitor
* Likelihood, in the opinion of the investigator, that either the subject or informant will be unable to complete a 26-week study
* Treatment with prohibited antipsychotic drug, and/or treatment with more than 2 permitted antipsychotic drugs. Treatment with a first-generation antipsychotic drug (typical antipsychotic) is prohibited unless it is administered at a low dose after discussion with the medical monitor
* Current treatment with any anticholinergic agent
* Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, fourth edition (DSM-IV) criteria met for alcohol abuse within the past 3 months or substance abuse (other than nicotine) within the last 6 months before screening
* Significant suicide risk as defined by 1) suicidal ideation as endorsed on items 4 or 5 of the Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) within the past year; 2) suicidal behavior detected by the C-SSRS during the past 2 years, or 3) psychiatric interview and examination
* Stroke within 6 months before screening, history of brain tumor, subdural hematoma, or other clinically significant neurological condition, head trauma with loss of consciousness within 12 months before screening
* Monoamine oxidase inhibitor antidepressants or tricyclic medications used in antidepressant doses are excluded. Other antidepressant medications are allowed if the subject has been treated with a stable dose for at least 3 months before screening
* Immunosuppressants, mood stabilizers, chronic use of a sedative hypnotic drug, chronic intake of clinically significant doses of opioid containing analgesics or any current methadone treatment all in the judgment of the investigator may be permitted depending on the circumstance
* Use of Central Nervous System(CNS) stimulants
* Nicotine therapy (including patches), varenicline (Chantix), or similar therapeutic agent within the last six months before screening
* Use of a benzodiazepine medication is allowed if the subject has not had a change in medication or dose for at least 3 months. For subjects prescribed benzodiazepines, short-acting benzodiazepines are to be used whenever possible. Use of longer-acting benzodiazepines may be acceptable if prior authorization is obtained from the medical monitor. When possible, benzodiazepines should not be administered within 3 hours before cognitive testing. The use of more than one sedative-hypnotic medication is not allowed.
18 Years
50 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Syneos Health
OTHER
NeuroCog Trials, Inc.
INDUSTRY
FORUM Pharmaceuticals Inc
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Tucson, Arizona, United States
Anaheim, California, United States
Bellflower, California, United States
Costa Mesa, California, United States
Culver City, California, United States
Downey, California, United States
Escondido, California, United States
Los Angeles, California, United States
Oceanside, California, United States
Orange, California, United States
San Diego, California, United States
Torrance, California, United States
Lauderhill, Florida, United States
Miami, Florida, United States
North Miami, Florida, United States
Orange City, Florida, United States
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Minneapolis, Minnesota, United States
Flowood, Mississippi, United States
Creve Coeur, Missouri, United States
O'Fallon, Missouri, United States
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Marlton, New Jersey, United States
Albuquerque, New Mexico, United States
Cedarhurst, New York, United States
New York, New York, United States
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Durham, North Carolina, United States
Cleveland, Ohio, United States
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Conshohocken, Pennsylvania, United States
Norristown, Pennsylvania, United States
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Dallas, Texas, United States
La Plata, Buenos Aires, Argentina
Caba, Buenos Aires F.D., Argentina
Córdoba, Córdoba Province, Argentina
Mendoza, Mendoza Province, Argentina
Melbourne, , Australia
Rio de Janeiro, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Itapira, São Paulo, Brazil
São Paulo, , Brazil
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
Penticton, British Columbia, Canada
Chatham, Ontario, Canada
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
Achim, , Germany
Berlin, , Germany
Düsseldorf, , Germany
Freiburg im Breisgau, , Germany
Leipzig, , Germany
Mittweida, , Germany
München, , Germany
Regebsburg, , Germany
Regensburg, , Germany
Stralsund, , Germany
Wiesbaden, , Germany
México, D.F, Mexico
Guadalajara, Jalisco, Mexico
Monterrey, Neuvo Leon, Mexico
Bialystok, , Poland
Gdansk, , Poland
Lodz, , Poland
Lublin, , Poland
Torun, , Poland
Tuszyn, , Poland
Warsaw, , Poland
Talagi, Arkhangelskaya oblast, Russia
Moscow, Moscow, Russia
Saint Petersburg, Sankt-Peterburg, Russia
Stavropol, , Russia
Belgrade, , Serbia
Kragujevac, , Serbia
Niš, , Serbia
Novi Kneževac, , Serbia
Singapore, Singapore, Singapore
Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
Mataró, Barcelona, Spain
Salamanca, Castille and León, Spain
Zamora, Castille and León, Spain
Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain
Coslada, Madrid, Spain
Madrid, Madrid, Spain
Vigo, Pontevedra, Spain
Donetsk, , Ukraine
Ivano-Frankivsk, , Ukraine
Kharkiv, , Ukraine
Kyiv, , Ukraine
Luhansk, , Ukraine
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-003208-10
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
EVP-6124-015
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.