Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab Compared With Placebo and Ustekinumab in Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis Subjects

NCT ID: NCT01708629

Last Updated: 2020-01-03

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1881 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-09-30

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of brodalumab at two different doses compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

A second purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy brodalumab at two different doses compared with ustekinumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

A third purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of 4 maintenance regimens of brodalumab.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study assess the safety and efficacy of brodalumab at two different doses compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

A second purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy brodalumab at two different doses compared with ustekinumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis.

A third purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of 4 maintenance regimens of brodalumab.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Plaque Psoriasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

210 mg brodalumab

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection until week 12. At week 12, participants are rerandomized to schedule 1, 2, 3, or 4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

210 mg brodalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

210 mg brodalumab administered SC

140 mg brodalumab

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection until week 12. At week 12, participants are rerandomized to schedule 1, 2, 3, or 4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

140 mg brodalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

140 mg brodalumab administered SC

ustekinumab

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection per the labeled dosing regimen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ustekinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab administered SC per the labeled dosing regimen.

Placebo

Administered by SC injection until week 12. At week 12 participants are assigned to 210 mg brodalumab.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

210 mg brodalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

210 mg brodalumab administered SC

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo administered SC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

210 mg brodalumab

210 mg brodalumab administered SC

Intervention Type DRUG

140 mg brodalumab

140 mg brodalumab administered SC

Intervention Type DRUG

ustekinumab

45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab administered SC per the labeled dosing regimen.

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

placebo administered SC

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Siliq Siliq Stelara

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject has had stable moderate to severe plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months
* Subject has involved body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10%, PASI ≥ 12, and sPGA ≥ 3 at screening and at baseline

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject diagnosed with erythrodermic psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, medication-induced psoriasis, or other skin conditions at (eg, eczema) that would interfere with study evaluations
* Subject has known history of Crohn's disease
* Subject has any other significant concurrent medical condition or laboratory abnormalities, as defined in the study protocol
* Subject has not stopped using certain psoriasis therapies as defined in the study protocol
* Subject has previously used ustekinumab or any anti-IL-17 biologic therapy
* Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in the study
* Female subject is unwilling to use highly effective methods of birth control unless 2 years post-menopausal or surgically sterile
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Burbank, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Encino, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fremont, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fullerton, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Riverside, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Francisco, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Farmington, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Trumbull, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boca Raton, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Coral Gables, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ocala, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tamarac, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Alpharetta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Macon, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boise, Idaho, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Champaign, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Maywood, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Normal, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wheaton, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Albany, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Owensboro, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Worcester, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clarkston, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clinton Township, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Las Vegas, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

East Windsor, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hoboken, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Verona, New Jersey, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

The Bronx, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

High Point, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cleveland, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Oswego, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Exton, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Johnston, Rhode Island, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Greer, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bartlett, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bellaire, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Webster, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Spokane, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Clarksburg, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Camperdown, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Darlinghurst, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

St Leonards, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Sydney, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Westmead, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Hectorville, South Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Fremantle, Western Australia, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Bruges, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Edegem, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Leuven, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Montigny-le-Tilleul, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Winnipeg, Manitoba, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

St. John's, Newfoundland and Labrador, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Halifax, Nova Scotia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Markham, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Richmond Hill, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Drummondville, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Hyacinthe, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Créteil, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Limoges, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Nice, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Poitiers, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Toulouse, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Chaïdári, Athens, Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Athens, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Ioannina, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Larissa, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Marousi, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Thessaloniki, , Greece

Site Status

Research Site

Békéscsaba, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szolnok, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szombathely, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Bologna, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Genova, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Milan, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Roma, , Italy

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Riga, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Ventspils, , Latvia

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Dąbrówka, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Gdansk, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Iwonicz-Zdrój, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Stalowa Wola, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Świdnik, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saratov, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Belgium Canada France Greece Hungary Italy Latvia Poland Russia

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lebwohl MG, Armstrong AW, Alexis AF, Lain EL, Jacobson AA. Efficacy of Brodalumab in Patients with Psoriasis and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure: A Review of Post Hoc Analyses. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;14(10):2709-2726. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01264-3. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39264399 (View on PubMed)

Kokolakis G, Vadstrup K, Hansen JB, Carrascosa JM. Increased Skin Clearance and Quality of Life Improvement with Brodalumab Compared with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis Patients with Aggravating Lifestyle Factors. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Dec;11(6):2027-2042. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00618-5. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34606048 (View on PubMed)

Gottlieb A, Lebwohl M, Liu C, Israel RJ, Jacobson A. Malignancy Rates in Brodalumab Clinical Studies for Psoriasis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Jun;21(3):421-430. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00512-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32207067 (View on PubMed)

McMichael A, Desai SR, Qureshi A, Rastogi S, Alexis AF. Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Skin of Color: Results from the Pooled AMAGINE-2/-3 Randomized Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Apr;20(2):267-276. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0408-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30471012 (View on PubMed)

Langley RG, Armstrong AW, Lebwohl MG, Blauvelt A, Hsu S, Tyring S, Rastogi S, Pillai R, Israel R. Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis who had inadequate responses to ustekinumab: subgroup analysis of two randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;180(2):306-314. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17318. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30328108 (View on PubMed)

Lebwohl M, Strober B, Menter A, Gordon K, Weglowska J, Puig L, Papp K, Spelman L, Toth D, Kerdel F, Armstrong AW, Stingl G, Kimball AB, Bachelez H, Wu JJ, Crowley J, Langley RG, Blicharski T, Paul C, Lacour JP, Tyring S, Kircik L, Chimenti S, Callis Duffin K, Bagel J, Koo J, Aras G, Li J, Song W, Milmont CE, Shi Y, Erondu N, Klekotka P, Kotzin B, Nirula A. Phase 3 Studies Comparing Brodalumab with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1318-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503824.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26422722 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20120104

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Phase 4 Clinical Study of Brodalumab
NCT04183881 COMPLETED PHASE4
Brodalumab in Palmoplantar Psoriasis
NCT04622033 UNKNOWN PHASE4