P3 Study Brodalumab in Treatment of Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

NCT ID: NCT01708603

Last Updated: 2020-01-06

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

1831 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-08-31

Study Completion Date

2015-10-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of brodalumab at two different doses

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

.The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of brodalumab at two different doses compared with placebo in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. A second purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy brodalumab at two different doses compared with ustekinumab in participants with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis. A third purpose of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of 4 maintenance regimens of brodalumab.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Moderate to Severe Plaque Psoriasis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

210 mg brodalumab

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection until week 12. At week 12, participants are rerandomized to schedule 1, 2, 3, or 4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

210 mg brodalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

210 mg brodalumab administered SC

140 mg brodalumab

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection until week 12. At week 12, participants are rerandomized to schedule 1, 2, 3, or 4.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

140 mg brodalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

140 mg brodalumab administered SC

ustekinumab

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection per the labeled dosing regimen.

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

ustekinumab

Intervention Type DRUG

45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab administered SC per the labeled dosing regimen.

Placebo

Administered by subcutaneous (SC) injection until week 12. At week 12 participants are assigned to 210 mg brodalumab.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

210 mg brodalumab

Intervention Type DRUG

210 mg brodalumab administered SC

placebo

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo administered SC

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

210 mg brodalumab

210 mg brodalumab administered SC

Intervention Type DRUG

140 mg brodalumab

140 mg brodalumab administered SC

Intervention Type DRUG

ustekinumab

45 mg or 90 mg ustekinumab administered SC per the labeled dosing regimen.

Intervention Type DRUG

placebo

Placebo administered SC

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Subject has had stable moderate to severe plaque psoriasis for at least 6 months
* Subject has involved body surface area (BSA) ≥ 10%, PASI ≥ 12, and sPGA ≥ 3 at screening and at baseline

Exclusion Criteria

* Subject diagnosed with erythrodermic psoriasis, pustular psoriasis, guttate psoriasis, medication-induced psoriasis, or other skin conditions at (eg, eczema) that would interfere with study evaluations
* Subject has known history of Crohn's disease
* Subject has any other significant concurrent medical condition or laboratory abnormalities, as defined in the study protocol
* Subject has not stopped using certain psoriasis therapies as defined in the study protocol
* Subject has previously used ustekinumab or any anti-IL-17 biologic therapy
* Subject is pregnant or breastfeeding, or planning to become pregnant while enrolled in the study
* Female subject is unwilling to use highly effective methods of birth control unless 2 years post-menopausal or surgically sterile
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

75 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Bausch Health Americas, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tucson, Arizona, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Hot Springs, Arkansas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bakersfield, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beverly Hills, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Irvine, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Los Angeles, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Diego, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Vista, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Denver, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Haven, Connecticut, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Aventura, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Tampa, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Newnan, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Snellville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Skokie, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Carmel, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Plainfield, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

South Bend, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Louisville, Kentucky, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rockville, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Silver Spring, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

North Andover, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ann Arbor, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fridley, Minnesota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Omaha, Nebraska, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Brooklyn, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Rochester, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Durham, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Raleigh, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beachwood, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Columbus, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gahanna, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

South Euclid, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Portland, Oregon, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Anderson, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mt. Pleasant, South Carolina, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Austin, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Site Status

Research Site

West Jordan, Utah, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Roanoke, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Phillip, Australian Capital Territory, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Benowa, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Woolloongabba, Queensland, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Box Hill, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Carlton, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Parkville, Victoria, Australia

Site Status

Research Site

Graz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Innsbruck, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Linz, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Vienna, , Austria

Site Status

Research Site

Calgary, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Edmonton, Alberta, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Surrey, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Ajax, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Greater Sudbury, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Mississauga, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Oakville, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Ottawa, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Peterborough, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Windsor, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Jihlava, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Nový Jičín, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Ústí nad Labem, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Amiens, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Besançon, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Brest, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Clermont-Ferrand, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Marseille, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Montpellier, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Paris, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pessac, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Pierre-Bénite, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Rouen, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Kecskemét, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Miskolc, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Nyíregyháza, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Veszprém, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Breda, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Nijmegen, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Rotterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Gdynia, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Katowice, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lublin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Szczecin, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Tarnów, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Coimbra, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Lisbon, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Porto, , Portugal

Site Status

Research Site

Córdoba, AndalucÃ-a, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Seville, AndalucÃ-a, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Alcañiz, Aragón, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Manacor, Balearic Islands, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Badalona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Cataluña, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

A Coruña, Galicia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Alcorcón, Madrid, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Australia Austria Canada Czechia France Hungary Netherlands Poland Portugal Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Lebwohl MG, Armstrong AW, Alexis AF, Lain EL, Jacobson AA. Efficacy of Brodalumab in Patients with Psoriasis and Risk Factors for Treatment Failure: A Review of Post Hoc Analyses. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2024 Oct;14(10):2709-2726. doi: 10.1007/s13555-024-01264-3. Epub 2024 Sep 12.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 39264399 (View on PubMed)

Kokolakis G, Vadstrup K, Hansen JB, Carrascosa JM. Increased Skin Clearance and Quality of Life Improvement with Brodalumab Compared with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis Patients with Aggravating Lifestyle Factors. Dermatol Ther (Heidelb). 2021 Dec;11(6):2027-2042. doi: 10.1007/s13555-021-00618-5. Epub 2021 Oct 2.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 34606048 (View on PubMed)

Gottlieb A, Lebwohl M, Liu C, Israel RJ, Jacobson A. Malignancy Rates in Brodalumab Clinical Studies for Psoriasis. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2020 Jun;21(3):421-430. doi: 10.1007/s40257-020-00512-4.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 32207067 (View on PubMed)

McMichael A, Desai SR, Qureshi A, Rastogi S, Alexis AF. Efficacy and Safety of Brodalumab in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis and Skin of Color: Results from the Pooled AMAGINE-2/-3 Randomized Trials. Am J Clin Dermatol. 2019 Apr;20(2):267-276. doi: 10.1007/s40257-018-0408-z.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30471012 (View on PubMed)

Langley RG, Armstrong AW, Lebwohl MG, Blauvelt A, Hsu S, Tyring S, Rastogi S, Pillai R, Israel R. Efficacy and safety of brodalumab in patients with psoriasis who had inadequate responses to ustekinumab: subgroup analysis of two randomized phase III trials. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Feb;180(2):306-314. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17318. Epub 2018 Dec 27.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30328108 (View on PubMed)

Lebwohl M, Strober B, Menter A, Gordon K, Weglowska J, Puig L, Papp K, Spelman L, Toth D, Kerdel F, Armstrong AW, Stingl G, Kimball AB, Bachelez H, Wu JJ, Crowley J, Langley RG, Blicharski T, Paul C, Lacour JP, Tyring S, Kircik L, Chimenti S, Callis Duffin K, Bagel J, Koo J, Aras G, Li J, Song W, Milmont CE, Shi Y, Erondu N, Klekotka P, Kotzin B, Nirula A. Phase 3 Studies Comparing Brodalumab with Ustekinumab in Psoriasis. N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct;373(14):1318-28. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1503824.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 26422722 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

20120103

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

A Phase 4 Clinical Study of Brodalumab
NCT04183881 COMPLETED PHASE4