Randomized Controlled Trial of the Meaning-Making Intervention (MMi)

NCT ID: NCT01693991

Last Updated: 2014-07-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE1

Total Enrollment

60 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-10-31

Study Completion Date

2013-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

Research questions: Pilot study research questions: Primary: 1)Can we recruit a sufficient number (i.e., at least 60 patients over 9 months) and retain a sufficient proportion of both men and women (i.e., at least 80% at 2, 4, or 6 months post-randomization) with advanced cancer in all 3 trial arms to allow completion of a full study in 4 years?; 2)Is MMi acceptable: to a general ACP? to both men and women?; Secondary: 1)Is it feasible to complete the intervention in 3-4 weeks? 2)How long is it feasible to test MMi effects: 2, 4 or 6 months post-randomization(retention rate=80%)? 3)Which recruitment strategies are most helpful? 4)What sample size is needed for a full study? Full-study research questions: Primary: Does adding the MMi to usual care (experimental group or EG) enhance meaning in life among newly diagnosed ACP, compared with those receiving usual care plus meetings with an empathic non-professional visitor (i.e., attention-control group or AC) or usual care alone (UC), at x months post-randomization? (time determined in pilot) "Meaning in life" (primary outcome) is defined as the belief that one's life has significance and purpose (i.e., global meaning) and "newly diagnosed ACP" is defined as the 6 months after first occurrence of, progression toward, or recurrence of stage III or IV cancer (TNM classification system). Secondary: In our future full-study, we plan to evaluate MMi effects on secondary outcomes such as existential wellbeing (MQOL existential wellbeing) and posttraumatic growth (Post-Traumatic Growth Inventory). We also plan to test a theoretical model where sense of meaning in life has a protective (moderating) effect on tertiary outcomes such as physical QoL (MQOL physical subscale), anxiety and depression (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS)), and overall QoL (MQOL Total) in EG patients. Methodology: RCT pilot study with 60 newly diagnosed ACP (stages III or IV) within 2 months of referral and 6 months of randomization, assigned randomly to: (1) EG, (2) AC, or (3) UC. Patients will complete self-report questionnaires (including outcome measures, as well as sociodemographic and medical variables) at 2, 4 and 6 months post-randomization.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

See above

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Advanced Cancer

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

SINGLE_GROUP

Primary Study Purpose

SUPPORTIVE_CARE

Blinding Strategy

SINGLE

Participants

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Meaning-Making intervention (MMi)

Patients in this arm will be receiving the Meaning-Making intervention (MMi) as per intervention manual (Lee, 2006).

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Meaning-Making intervention (MMi)

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

MMi and attention control sessions will take place weekly for 3 weeks at the patient's home or hospital, as the patient prefers. We will try to limit delays to no more than 1 week if needed (e.g., for recovery from treatment side-effects), but because the feasibility of this schedule is one of the research questions, if more flexibility is required we will not withdraw people from the study if the delay is longer, since a longer intervention period could be incorporated in a full-scale RCT. Dates and duration of each session will be tracked. MMi sessions will be conducted by 2 bilingual mental health professionals (nurse, social worker, or psychologist) with at least 1 year of clinical oncology experience and will be initiated within 1 week after randomization.

Empathic visitor

This person will provide the basic ingredients fostering a good therapeutic relationship (i.e., trust, warmth, empathy, neutrality and authenticity) without further intervention or probing. The empathic visitor will be specifically instructed to avoid initiating discussions about meaning (e.g., how the patient interprets his feelings and thoughts, understands his/her illness and meaning in life), and focus discussions on what is currently happening (rather than on the interface between past and present).

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Empathic visitor

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

This person will provide the basic ingredients fostering a good therapeutic relationship (i.e., trust, warmth, empathy, neutrality and authenticity) without further intervention or probing. The empathic visitor will be specifically instructed to avoid initiating discussions about meaning (e.g., how the patient interprets his feelings and thoughts, understands his/her illness and meaning in life), and focus discussions on what is currently happening (rather than on the interface between past and present).

Control Group

Patients in this group will only be receiving treatment as usual.

Group Type NO_INTERVENTION

No interventions assigned to this group

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Meaning-Making intervention (MMi)

MMi and attention control sessions will take place weekly for 3 weeks at the patient's home or hospital, as the patient prefers. We will try to limit delays to no more than 1 week if needed (e.g., for recovery from treatment side-effects), but because the feasibility of this schedule is one of the research questions, if more flexibility is required we will not withdraw people from the study if the delay is longer, since a longer intervention period could be incorporated in a full-scale RCT. Dates and duration of each session will be tracked. MMi sessions will be conducted by 2 bilingual mental health professionals (nurse, social worker, or psychologist) with at least 1 year of clinical oncology experience and will be initiated within 1 week after randomization.

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Empathic visitor

This person will provide the basic ingredients fostering a good therapeutic relationship (i.e., trust, warmth, empathy, neutrality and authenticity) without further intervention or probing. The empathic visitor will be specifically instructed to avoid initiating discussions about meaning (e.g., how the patient interprets his feelings and thoughts, understands his/her illness and meaning in life), and focus discussions on what is currently happening (rather than on the interface between past and present).

Intervention Type BEHAVIORAL

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

MMi

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Inclusion Criteria: 1) Diagnosed with advanced cancer (stage III or IV --TNM classification system; 117); first occurrence, progression or recurrence) of any type of solid tumour \<2 months at referral and \<6 months at randomization. 2) Willing to participate in weekly MMi or AC sessions. 3) \>18 years. 4) Alert and capable of giving free and informed consent. 5) Able to speak and read English or French.

Exclusion Criteria

Exclusion Criteria: 1) Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) score \<60 (rated by referring oncologists/nurses or Research Coordinator (RC)) or expected survival \<6 months according to clinical judgment. 2) Currently receiving radiotherapy (Rx) treatment (although these patients can be reassessed after Rx). Patients will only be included in the study when they have recovered from severe side-effects from Rx and when they feel they can participate in the study. Severe side-effects are defined as a score of 3 or 4 on any of the site-specific toxicity markers of the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) Common Toxicity Criteria or with more than 3 markers with a score of 2 (moderate side-effects), as evaluated by the treating physician (in consultation with the radiotherapist. 3) Suicidal. Present a score of ≥2 on the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) suicide item (item #9), administered by the RC or RA during the consent meeting. 4) Known diagnosis of schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder. 5) Planning a trip within 2 months that would interrupt delivery of the MMi or AC.
Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Jewish General Hospital

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Melissa Henry

Psychologist

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Melissa Henry, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital; and McGill University

S Robin Cohen, Ph.D.

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Lady Davis Institute for Medical Research, Jewish General Hospital; and McGill University

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

McGill University Health Centre

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Jewish General Hospital

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

258431

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.