Cardiovascular Disease Biomarkers in Smokers and Moist Snuff Consumers
NCT ID: NCT01692353
Last Updated: 2016-02-17
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
168 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2008-09-30
2009-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
1. CVD-related physiological assessments: Flow-mediated dilation (FMD), carotid intima-media thickness (CIMT), ankle-brachial index (ABI), spirometry and expired carbon monoxide (ECO).
2. CVD-related biomarker assessments in blood and urine (biomarkers of tobacco effect).
3. Biomarkers of tobacco exposure in urine and blood.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Development of Biomarkers of Effect From Chronic Tobacco Usage
NCT01923402
Effects of FDA Authorized Smokeless Tobacco Claims Among US Adults Who Smoke Cigarettes
NCT06927700
Influence of Authorized Smokeless Tobacco Product Modified Risk Claims I: Consumer Product Demand
NCT07102082
Prospective Natural History Study of Smoking, Immune Cell Profiles, Epigenetics and COVID-19
NCT04403386
Novel Determinants and Measures of Smokeless Tobacco Use: Study 1
NCT01067586
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Furthermore, this study will measure biomarkers of tobacco exposure to assess their ability to differentiate the three tobacco consumer groups (smokers, moist snuff consumers, non-tobacco consumers) based on product use. Estimating exposures to combustion-related compounds found in tobacco smoke is best accomplished using biomarkers. A key advantage of human exposure biomarkers is that they are considered reliable metrics of the levels of exposure that consumers actually experience when using tobacco products (Hecht et al., 2010). Because combustion does not occur during ST use, ST products lack most of the combustion-related compounds found in tobacco smoke. Biomarker differences found between different tobacco use groups to harmful or potentially harmful constituents may indicate differences in subsequent health risks (Rodu and Godshall, 2006; Hatsukami et al., 2006).
Epidemiological data demonstrate that the health risks associated with cigarettes are significantly greater than those associated with the use of non-combustible tobacco and nicotine products (Surgeon General, 2010). On a relative risk continuum, cigarette smoking presents a significantly greater risk to tobacco users than use of non-combustible smokeless products. ST products, which are consumed orally, do no generate chemicals associated with the burning of tobacco, and thus, present a reduced toxicant profile compared to smoking.
To address the purpose and objectives of this study, the study was conducted as follows:
* Subjects were consented for the study prior to any procedures being performed and screened on study-specific inclusion/exclusion criteria to determine subject eligibility (within 28 days of study check-in).
* Eligible subjects were admitted to the clinical research unit between 12:00 noon and 5:00 p.m. on Day 1 and confined for one overnight stay (approximately 18-23 hours).
* After all study procedures were completed on Day 1 and Day 2, appropriate basic safety assessments were made and subjects were discharged approximately at 12:00 noon on Day 2.
A brief description of the study procedures performed is listed below.
* After check-in on Day 1, eligible subjects observed a 45-minute tobacco abstention period, followed by use of a single unit of their usual brand (UB) tobacco product, referred to as a "Challenge." For smokers, the "challenge" was smoking one UB cigarette in their usual manner; for moist snuff consumers, a 30-minute use of one typical pinch of their UB moist snuff.
* Fifteen minutes after the end of UB use, the following procedures were performed sequentially: ECO; blood samples for biomarkers of exposure (serum nicotine and cotinine, percent carboxyhemoglobin in whole blood); and ABI.
* At 30 minutes post-UB use, FMD was measured followed by administration of health-related questionnaires. The non-tobacco consumers had no product "Challenge". The completion of study questionnaires served as the reference point for collection of ECO, ABI and FMD.
* Blood biomarkers of tobacco exposure were collected on Day 1 following product "Challenge" and on Day 2 following an overnight tobacco abstention and fast.
* Urine biomarkers of tobacco exposure and effect were collected on both Day 1 post-"Challenge" and on Day 2 fasting.
* Blood biomarkers of tobacco effect were only collected on Day 2 fasting, followed by the re-assessment of the physiological measures (ECO, ABI, FMD) and assessment of CIMT.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
CROSS_SECTIONAL
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Exclusive cigarette smokers (SMK)
Subject's usual brand (UB) of cigarettes
Subject's usual brand (UB) tobacco product
For SMK: UB of cigarettes; For MSC: UB of moist snuff
Exclusive moist snuff consumers (MSC)
Subject's usual brand (UB) of moist snuff
Subject's usual brand (UB) tobacco product
For SMK: UB of cigarettes; For MSC: UB of moist snuff
Non-tobacco consumers (NTC)
No use of tobacco or nicotine-containing products of any kind
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Subject's usual brand (UB) tobacco product
For SMK: UB of cigarettes; For MSC: UB of moist snuff
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Moist Snuff Consumers: exclusive oral smokeless tobacco users of any brand (Copenhagen, Skoal, Grizzly, Kodiak, Timber Wolf, Longhorn, Red Man, Levi Garrett, Beech-Nut, Chattanooga Chew, Kayak, etc.), any style (snuff cut, long cut, fine cut, pouch, loose, or plug) and any flavor (natural, straight, mint, wintergreen, etc.) who reported using at least two cans or packages per week for at least three years prior to Day 1 and whose ECO was 0 to 5 ppm (a range of 6 to 10 ppm was allowed upon joint review by the Sponsor and Investigator).
* Non-tobacco Consumers: never-smokers/never-ST users whose ECO was 0 to 5 ppm (a range of 6 to 10 ppm was allowed upon joint review by the Sponsor and Investigator).
* Male, between 26 and 49 years of age, inclusive (on Day 1 check-in).
* Free of clinically significant health problems in the opinion of the Investigator.
* Forced expiratory volume exhaled in one second (FEV1) ≥70% of predicted at Screening.
* Willing to undergo all study procedures during confinement.
* Not taking medication on a daily basis for chronic medical disorders deemed clinically significant by the Investigator.
* Willing to suspend usage of daily aspirin or over-the-counter (OTC) medication seven days prior to Day 1.
* Not taking any creatine supplements.
* Negative tests for selected drugs of abuse and alcohol at Screening and at Day 1 check-in.
* Able to read and comprehend questionnaires in English.
* Able to comprehend and willing to sign an Informed Consent Form (ICF).
Exclusion Criteria
* \<70% predicted FEV1 from three acceptable maneuvers.
* Unwilling to have the FMD procedure performed two or more times during confinement.
* Unwilling to have the ABI procedure performed two times during confinement.
* For the FMD determination, poor brachial artery visualization due to extremely deep position or severe artifacts (noise) due to overlying muscle that, in the sonographer(s)' opinion, would result in an inferior, unreadable or unobtainable brachial artery image.
* A donation of blood from 30 days prior to Screening through Day 1, inclusive, or of plasma from two weeks prior to Screening through Day 1, inclusive.
* Receipt of blood products within two months prior to Day 1 check-in.
* Evidence of visible oral cancer, as found in an oral health examination at Screening or based on oral health questions at Day 1 check-in.
* Subject who is an employee of the clinical site.
* Subject who has participated in any other investigational study drug or product trial in which receipt of an investigational study drug or product occurred within 30 days prior to Day 1 check-in, inclusive.
26 Years
49 Years
MALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
MDS Pharma Services
INDUSTRY
Analytisch-biologisches Forschungslabor GmbH
INDUSTRY
BioClinica, Inc.
INDUSTRY
Pacific Biomarkers
OTHER
Rules-Based Medicine, Inc.
INDUSTRY
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
David L Heavner, MS
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Buddy G Brown, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Bobbette A Jones, DrPH, CCRP
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
MDS Pharma Services (US), Inc. (Currently Celerion)
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Hatsukami DK, Benowitz NL, Rennard SI, Oncken C, Hecht SS. Biomarkers to assess the utility of potential reduced exposure tobacco products. Nicotine Tob Res. 2006 Aug;8(4):600-22. doi: 10.1080/14622200600858166.
Hecht SS, Yuan JM, Hatsukami D. Applying tobacco carcinogen and toxicant biomarkers in product regulation and cancer prevention. Chem Res Toxicol. 2010 Jun 21;23(6):1001-8. doi: 10.1021/tx100056m.
Piano MR, Benowitz NL, Fitzgerald GA, Corbridge S, Heath J, Hahn E, Pechacek TF, Howard G; American Heart Association Council on Cardiovascular Nursing. Impact of smokeless tobacco products on cardiovascular disease: implications for policy, prevention, and treatment: a policy statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation. 2010 Oct 12;122(15):1520-44. doi: 10.1161/CIR.0b013e3181f432c3. Epub 2010 Sep 13. No abstract available.
Rodu B, Godshall WT. Tobacco harm reduction: an alternative cessation strategy for inveterate smokers. Harm Reduct J. 2006 Dec 21;3:37. doi: 10.1186/1477-7517-3-37.
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); National Center for Chronic Disease Prevention and Health Promotion (US); Office on Smoking and Health (US). How Tobacco Smoke Causes Disease: The Biology and Behavioral Basis for Smoking-Attributable Disease: A Report of the Surgeon General. Atlanta (GA): Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (US); 2010. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK53017/
Campbell LR, Brown BG, Jones BA, Marano KM, Borgerding MF. Study of cardiovascular disease biomarkers among tobacco consumers, part 1: biomarkers of exposure. Inhal Toxicol. 2015 Feb;27(3):149-56. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2015.1013228. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Nordskog BK, Brown BG, Marano KM, Campell LR, Jones BA, Borgerding MF. Study of cardiovascular disease biomarkers among tobacco consumers, part 2: biomarkers of biological effect. Inhal Toxicol. 2015 Feb;27(3):157-66. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2015.1013227. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Marano KM, Kathman SJ, Jones BA, Nordskog BK, Brown BG, Borgerding MF. Study of cardiovascular disease biomarkers among tobacco consumers. Part 3: evaluation and comparison with the US National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Inhal Toxicol. 2015 Feb;27(3):167-73. doi: 10.3109/08958378.2015.1009196. Epub 2015 Mar 19.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RJRT-CSD0806
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.