Alteration in Hearing Following Accidental Dural Puncture. A Study in Parturients
NCT ID: NCT01682967
Last Updated: 2015-09-29
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
21 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-01-31
2015-09-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Headache following accidental PDPH is very typical as it increases significantly when sitting or standing and often disappears completely on lying down. It is typically located in the back of the head, accentuated by light and often decreases with intake of large quantity of fluids. In many cases, it is self-limiting and most often decreases with time and bed rest.
Diagnosis of PDPH is clinical and sometimes difficult. It is well known that liquor leakage, as following spinal anaesthesia, results in partial loss of unilateral or bilateral hearing that can be detected by oto-acoustic hearing loss. We plan to use this knowledge and test the hypothesis that measurement of hearing loss may be a diagnostic method for confirmation of clinical symptoms and signs of accidental PDPH.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Post-dural Puncture Headache: A Retrospective Study
NCT03790124
Long-term Effects of Accidental Dural Puncture in Patients Having Had an Epidural Blood Patch (LEAP)
NCT02149680
Chronic Headache and Chronic Backache Following Unintentional Dural Puncture at Delivery Room.
NCT03908424
Multimodal Approach to the Intrathecal Catheter for Obstetric Accidental Dural Puncture
NCT05910086
Incidence of Headache Following an Unintentional Dural Puncture
NCT01977898
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. patients without clinical symptoms of postdural puncture headache
2. patients with clinical symptoms of postdural puncture headache
In addition, a control group of parturients who have not received an epidural analgesia would constitute the control group.
All patients would have audiometry (oto-acoustic emission - OAE, and auditory steady state response - ASSR) done following diagnosis of PDPH. Subsequently, the patients would be observed for 24 h to assess whether the headache resolves spontaneously. A new audiometry would be done at this stage. Those patients with substantial evidence of PDPH at this stage would receive an epidural blood patch (EBP) and a new audiometric assessment would be made after 4 h and 24 h to assess whether any audiometric deficit has resolved or not. All patients would have a similar measurement of hearing after 3 months when it is believed that most patients have returned to normal hearing. In addition to audiometric analysis, patients would be asked to fill out a detailed PDPH questionnaire at the same time periods.
All measurements would be compared with patients who have received an EDA but without PDPH and those who have not received an EDA.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
CASE_CONTROL
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Experimental group
Patients suffering from PDPH would form this group
No interventions assigned to this group
Control group - Epidural
Patients who received an epidural during labour but did not have symptoms of PDPH would form this reference group
No interventions assigned to this group
Control Group without Epidural analgesia
Patients in labour who did not receive an EDA would form this cohort of controls
No interventions assigned to this group
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
45 Years
FEMALE
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Karolinska Institutet
OTHER
Örebro University, Sweden
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Anil Gupta
Associate Professor
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
University Hospital
Örebro, , Sweden
Karolinskasjukhuset
Solna, , Sweden
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
AHEAD-11
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.