Trial Outcomes & Findings for Good Schools Study (NCT NCT01678846)
NCT ID: NCT01678846
Last Updated: 2016-01-26
Results Overview
past week experience of any physical violence from school staff
COMPLETED
NA
3820 participants
2-year follow-up
2016-01-26
Participant Flow
Cross-sectional baseline and endline surveys were conducted in 42 schools in June/July 2012 and June/July 2014. A simple random sample of up to 130 P5, 6 and 7 students were invited for individual interviews. If there were fewer than 130 P5-7 students in a school, all were invited for interview.
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Good School Toolkit
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Good School Toolkit: The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good\_school\_toolkit.php).
|
Control
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
1921
|
1899
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
1921
|
1899
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
Reasons for withdrawal
Withdrawal data not reported
Baseline Characteristics
Good Schools Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Good School Toolkit
n=1824 Participants
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Good School Toolkit: The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good\_school\_toolkit.php).
|
Control
n=1882 Participants
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
|
Total
n=3706 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
13.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=93 Participants
|
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=4 Participants
|
13.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 1.5 • n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
927 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
1010 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1937 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
897 Participants
n=93 Participants
|
872 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
1769 Participants
n=27 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-year follow-uppast week experience of any physical violence from school staff
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Good School Toolkit
n=1921 Participants
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Good School Toolkit: The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good\_school\_toolkit.php).
|
Control
n=1899 Participants
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Physical Violence From School Staff
|
595 participants
|
924 participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-year follow-upscore on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ): 20 questions. Total difficulties score, divided by the number of completed items. Modelled as a continuous variable. Range 0 (no difficulties) to 2 (high difficulties).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Good School Toolkit
n=1921 Participants
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Good School Toolkit: The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good\_school\_toolkit.php).
|
Control
n=1899 Participants
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Child Mental Health
|
0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
0.44 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 0.26
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: 2-year follow-upWord recognition in English(words per minute). Early Grade Reading Assessment, Uganda version. Calculated as number of words read correctly (out of a maximum of 50), divided by the time (out of a maximum of 60 seconds).
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Good School Toolkit
n=1921 Participants
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Good School Toolkit: The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good\_school\_toolkit.php).
|
Control
n=1899 Participants
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Educational Achievement: Word Recognition in English
|
48.6 words per minute
Standard Deviation 27.7
|
49.7 words per minute
Standard Deviation 27.7
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: At 2 year follow-upFive questions. Each question asked with response options: all the time, most of the time, sometimes, never: I feel that my teachers care about me. I feel safe in school. I feel like I belong at school. I like to spend time at school. I am scared of my teachers (reverse coded). Scores summed, modelled as a continuous variable. Range 0 (low) to 15 (high). Higher score is better safety and well-being at school.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Good School Toolkit
n=1921 Participants
Schools in the intervention arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and implementation support.
Good School Toolkit: The Toolkit uses a six step process to create a school wide intervention that engages teachers, students, administration, and parents to reflect on how they can promote quality of education in their school. The Toolkit articulates complex ideas (what is a good learning environment, a good teacher, how to create positive discipline without using violence) through booklets, posters and school initiated learning processes. Specific modules on alternative discipline techniques and how staff can use positive discipline are included in the Toolkit. The intervention includes sessions on knowledge, attitudes and opportunities to practice new behavioural skills. Work is led by teachers and students, and supported by visits from Raising Voices staff. The Toolkit can be reviewed at (http://www.raisingvoices.org/children/good\_school\_toolkit.php).
|
Control
n=1899 Participants
Schools in this arm will receive the Good Schools Toolkit materials and some implementation support after the end of the trial.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Safety and Well-being at School
|
11.7 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.4
|
11.1 units on a scale
Standard Deviation 2.5
|
Adverse Events
Good School Toolkit
Control
Serious adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Other adverse events
Adverse event data not reported
Additional Information
Dr Karen Devries
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee
- Publication restrictions are in place