The Pain in Intensive Care Unit: Different Rating System Comparing

NCT ID: NCT01669486

Last Updated: 2013-04-23

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Total Enrollment

100 participants

Study Classification

OBSERVATIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Study Completion Date

2013-04-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The purpose of this research is to find the best system for assessing the pain of critically ill patient in Intensive Care Unit (ICU).

At first the investigators assess the sedation of the patient with the scale sedation-agitation scale (SAS) or the delirium with the confusion assessment method, if the patient is too sedated or delirious the investigators consider him unable to use the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS).

The investigators compare two different scales Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) which include no verbal items. Each items has been evaluated in three different moments: before, during and after the nurses' care.

The investigators compare the scales between them. Then, every time the investigators value the score of these scales with the self-report of patients with the VAS scale (when it is possible) and finally with the physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate).

In the end, the investigators compare two different classes of patient: the surgical and medical one. The investigators search for some differences in the perception of the pain between these two classes.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

This study has specific aims:

1. to find the best method to evaluate the pain in critically ill patients;
2. to compare the perception of pain analysed trough CPOT and BPS;
3. to compare CPOT and BPS between medical and surgical patients.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Critical Illness

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Observational Model Type

COHORT

Study Time Perspective

PROSPECTIVE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

ICU patients

All patients admitted to ICU for a minimal hospitalization of 24 hours, invasive mechanically ventilated, will be evaluated with CPOT and BPS scores, during nurses work, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.

CPOT, BPS

Intervention Type OTHER

Scoring pain of the patients during nurses activity in ICU, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

CPOT, BPS

Scoring pain of the patients during nurses activity in ICU, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.

Intervention Type OTHER

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* male and female
* require of Mechanical Ventilation (MV)
* Hospitalization on ICU \> 24 hours

Exclusion Criteria

* Age \< 18 years
* Tetraplegic
* Neuromuscolar disease
* Neuromuscolar blocking agents by continuous infusion
* Spontaneous breathing without Mechanical Ventilation (MV)
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

85 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Università degli Studi dell'Insubria

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Paolo Severgnini

Prof.

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Paolo MD Severgnini, Prof.

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Universita' degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Azienda ospedaliera ospedale Circolo e Fondazione Macchi

Varese, Varese, Italy

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Italy

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Severgnini P, Pelosi P, Contino E, Serafinelli E, Novario R, Chiaranda M. Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: prospective, observational study. J Intensive Care. 2016 Nov 7;4:68. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0192-x. eCollection 2016.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 27833752 (View on PubMed)

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

1514

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

The Post-ICU Pain Study
NCT07180407 RECRUITING
Intensive Care Unit Risk Score
NCT04661735 RECRUITING
COPD Scoring Systems in ICU
NCT05522322 UNKNOWN