The Pain in Intensive Care Unit: Different Rating System Comparing
NCT ID: NCT01669486
Last Updated: 2013-04-23
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
100 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2012-06-30
2013-04-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
At first the investigators assess the sedation of the patient with the scale sedation-agitation scale (SAS) or the delirium with the confusion assessment method, if the patient is too sedated or delirious the investigators consider him unable to use the Visual Analogic Scale (VAS).
The investigators compare two different scales Critical Care Pain Observation Tool (CPOT) and Behavioural Pain Scale (BPS) which include no verbal items. Each items has been evaluated in three different moments: before, during and after the nurses' care.
The investigators compare the scales between them. Then, every time the investigators value the score of these scales with the self-report of patients with the VAS scale (when it is possible) and finally with the physiological parameters (blood pressure, heart rate and respiratory rate).
In the end, the investigators compare two different classes of patient: the surgical and medical one. The investigators search for some differences in the perception of the pain between these two classes.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Pain Assessment in the Intensive Care Unit
NCT01628185
Use of Critical-Care Pain Observation Tool and Bispectral Index for Detection of Pain in Brain Injured Patients
NCT03368326
Nurse-led Pain Management in Adult ICU
NCT05488834
Pupillometry for Pain Assessment in Critically Ill Patients
NCT02576132
Pain Measurement and Pain Management in the Intensive Care Unit(ICU)
NCT00773045
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. to find the best method to evaluate the pain in critically ill patients;
2. to compare the perception of pain analysed trough CPOT and BPS;
3. to compare CPOT and BPS between medical and surgical patients.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
COHORT
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
ICU patients
All patients admitted to ICU for a minimal hospitalization of 24 hours, invasive mechanically ventilated, will be evaluated with CPOT and BPS scores, during nurses work, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.
CPOT, BPS
Scoring pain of the patients during nurses activity in ICU, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
CPOT, BPS
Scoring pain of the patients during nurses activity in ICU, in particular before and after nurses manoeuvers.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* require of Mechanical Ventilation (MV)
* Hospitalization on ICU \> 24 hours
Exclusion Criteria
* Tetraplegic
* Neuromuscolar disease
* Neuromuscolar blocking agents by continuous infusion
* Spontaneous breathing without Mechanical Ventilation (MV)
18 Years
85 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Università degli Studi dell'Insubria
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Paolo Severgnini
Prof.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Paolo MD Severgnini, Prof.
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Universita' degli Studi dell'Insubria, Varese, Italy
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Azienda ospedaliera ospedale Circolo e Fondazione Macchi
Varese, Varese, Italy
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Severgnini P, Pelosi P, Contino E, Serafinelli E, Novario R, Chiaranda M. Accuracy of Critical Care Pain Observation Tool and Behavioral Pain Scale to assess pain in critically ill conscious and unconscious patients: prospective, observational study. J Intensive Care. 2016 Nov 7;4:68. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0192-x. eCollection 2016.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
1514
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.