Verapamil vs. Sertraline for Vestibular Migraine & Chronic Subjective Dizziness
NCT ID: NCT01669304
Last Updated: 2015-08-24
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE1
32 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2014-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Patients who have VM and CSD together were given either verapamil or sertraline for 12 weeks. These medications are used to treat VM and CSD, though they are not approved for this purpose. Verapamil is believed to have stronger effects on symptoms of VM. Sertraline is believed to have stronger effects on symptoms of CSD. By comparing the responses of patients to these two medications, the researchers hoped to learn more about the key features of VM and CSD.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Study of the Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Serlopitant for the Treatment of Chronic Pruritus of Unknown Origin
NCT03841331
Sertraline vs. Placebo for Symptoms Following Traumatic Brain Injury
NCT00208585
A Comparison of Sertraline-reboxetine Combination Therapy Versus Sertraline or Reboxetine Monotherapy in the Treatment of Major Depression.
NCT00636246
Modulation of Visually Evoked Potentials by an Antidepressant
NCT00263133
Study to Evaluate The Effect Of Sertraline on the Cardiac Repolarization in Healthy Subjects
NCT02651623
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
The primary goal of this study was to dissect VM and CSD in order to identify the key features and clarify the diagnostic criteria of each condition. Subjects diagnosed with coexisting VM-CSD were treated with either verapamil or sertraline. It was hypothesized that a differential treatment response to these two pharmacologic probes would help to tease apart the unique clinical features of VM and CSD and identify risk factors that are shared or separate between the two conditions. It was hoped that the different mechanisms of action of the two study medications might also shed light on the physiologic underpinnings of VM and CSD.
This project was a 14-week, prospective, randomized, double-blind, parallel group, pharmacologic dissection (PD) trial. A 12-week treatment period followed 2 weeks of baseline observation. Patients charted daily headache and vestibular symptoms. VM and CSD symptoms and potential confounds such as anxiety and depression were measured at two week intervals. Data were analyzed for differential and shared treatment effects that align with or oppose current concepts of VM and CSD.
A PD trial uses response to one or more pharmaceutical probes (drugs) to study physiologic mechanisms of illness. A PD trial may provide data to separate overlapping manifestations of comorbid illnesses. This is useful for conditions that lack biomarkers. It also may provide data to identify characteristics of illnesses (symptoms, signs, cellular processes) that are associated with specific pharmacologic mechanisms.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
DIAGNOSTIC
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Verapamil
Verapamil extended release oral tablets administered in a flexible dose format ranging from 120 mg to 360 mg daily, as determined by severity of headache and dizziness.
Verapamil
Sertraline
Sertraline oral tablets administered in a flexible dose format ranging from 25 mg to 150 mg daily depending on severity of headache and dizziness.
Sertraline
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Verapamil
Sertraline
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. All other co-existing medical or psychiatric conditions are stable, and no greater than moderate severity
3. Able to complete study assessments in person and by phone
4. Able to travel to Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minnesota for first and last study visits
5. Willing to avoid pregnancy during study (abstinence or acceptable birth control)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Medical or psychiatric conditions that would preclude or confound study drugs
3. Use of medications or supplements that would preclude or confound study drugs
4. Past treatment of headache or dizziness with a full trial of a calcium channel blocker or selective serotonin reuptake inhibitor
5. Allergy to verapamil or sertraline
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Mayo Clinic
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Jeffrey P. Staab
Associate Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Jeffrey Staab, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Mayo Clinic
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Mayo Clinic
Rochester, Minnesota, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Staab JP, Ruckenstein MJ. Expanding the differential diagnosis of chronic dizziness. Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2007 Feb;133(2):170-6. doi: 10.1001/archotol.133.2.170.
Ruckenstein MJ, Staab JP. Chronic subjective dizziness. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2009 Feb;42(1):71-7, ix. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2008.09.011.
Eggers SD, Staab JP, Neff BA, Goulson AM, Carlson ML, Shepard NT. Investigation of the coherence of definite and probable vestibular migraine as distinct clinical entities. Otol Neurotol. 2011 Sep;32(7):1144-51. doi: 10.1097/MAO.0b013e31822a1c67.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-002814
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.