Phase 2 Efficacy Trial of Z160 in Lumbosacral Radiculopathy
NCT ID: NCT01655849
Last Updated: 2013-12-12
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2
141 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2013-11-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Z160
375mg BID
z160
placebo
matching placebo control
Placebo
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
z160
Placebo
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* The subject perceives pain in one or both lower limbs at sites that are consistent with the area innervated by the L4, L5, or S1 nerve roots, with or without other sensory symptoms in the affected areas (typically, the pain may be perceived in the buttock, thigh, calf, leg, foot, or toes).
* The history of the pain suggests that the cause of the LSR is due to injury of the lumbosacral nerve root(s) by degenerative disease of the vertebrae in the lumbosacral spine or associated soft tissues (including the intervertebral discs).
* The duration of pain since onset is ≥ 12 weeks.
* Based on clinical history, the intensity of pain has been stable during the 2-week period before screening.
2. In the investigator's opinion, the subject's diagnosis of LSR is supported by all of the following at screening:
* Based on the StEP instrument:
* Neurological examination of lower limbs shows impaired muscle power, sensory function, or deep tendon reflexes in the territory of the affected nerve roots.
* Pain/sensory disturbance in dermatomal/myotomal distribution is precipitated or exacerbated by straight leg raising (the straight-leg-raising test should be performed as specified in StEP).
* The total StEP score is ≥ 4 (indicative of LSR as the cause of the pain)
4\. At screening, the subject has an average daily pain score for neuropathic pain due to LSR of ≥ 3 and ≤ 8 on the PI-NRS.
5\. If female, the subject must be postmenopausal (defined as no menstruation for at least 12 months), surgically sterilized for ≥3 months before the screening visit, or agree to use 2 reliable methods of contraception (oral, implantable, transdermal, or injectable contraceptives in conjunction with an intrauterine device or a barrier method) during the 6-week treatment period, during the 6 week posttreatment follow-up period, and for an additional 8 weeks after the last study visit (Week 12, Visit 9) to avoid pregnancy if of childbearing potential (defined as biologically capable of becoming pregnant). If male, the subject must agree to use condoms during the 6-week treatment period with the study drug, during the 6-week posttreatment follow up period, and for an additional 8 weeks after the last study visit (Week 12, Visit 9).
* Pain that is associated with a substantial somatic pain component (e.g., non-neuropathic/musculoskeletal pain in lower limbs or other parts of the body apart from the back) or more than one cause or potential cause for pain symptoms.
* Any painful concurrent rheumatic disease such as, but not limited to, fibromyalgia, rheumatoid arthritis, or significant osteoarthritis.
Any question regarding the acceptability of the etiology of the neuropathic pain should be discussed with the Zalicus medical monitor.
2. In the investigator's opinion, the subject is unable to reliably delineate or assess his or her own pain by anatomical location/distribution (e.g., the subject cannot reliably tell the difference between his or her back pain and lower limb pain and cannot rate the intensity of each separately).
3. The subject has pain in the lower limbs solely upon walking and not at rest.
4. The subject has undergone surgery for LSR within the last 6 months or has received treatment with epidural injections, nerve blocks, or acupuncture for LSR within 4 weeks before screening.
5. The subject has:
* A history of seizure, excluding pediatric febrile seizures, or currently has seizures
* A history of or a current diagnosis of schizophrenia or bipolar disorder
* Had a stroke or TIA ≤ 6 months before the screening visit
* Has an episode of major depression or generalized anxiety disorder ≤ 6 months before the screening visit.
6. The subject has a history of or currently has any of the following conditions that, in the investigator's opinion, may interfere with the study procedures or compromise the subject's safety:
* Cardiovascular disease
* Gastrointestinal disease
* Hepatic disease
* Respiratory disease
* Renal disease
* Any condition that is known to interfere with the absorption, distribution, metabolism, or excretion of drugs
7. The subject has a history of or currently has:
* Any clinically significant vital sign, ECG, or laboratory abnormalities.
* QTcF \>450 msec (males) or \>470 msec (females)
8. The subject had a malignancy.
9. The subject has had a positive test for HIV antibody or a history of HIV.
10. The subject has had a positive test for hepatitis B surface antigen or hepatitis C antibody.
11. The subject has a history of AST, ALT or bilirubine \>2 times the upper limit of normal.
12. The subject has a history of hypersensitivity to calcium channel blockers.
13. The subject has a history of multiple drug allergies (≥ 2 kinds) that, in the investigator's opinion, may place him or her at greater risk during participation in the study.
14. The subject has participated in a previous clinical study of Z160 or has received another investigational drug ≤ 30 days before the screening visit.
15. The subject has taken a prohibited medication ≤ 30 days before the screening visit.
16. The subject has a history of alcohol or narcotic substance abuse, as defined in the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition (DSM-IV), ≤ 1 year before the screening visit.
17. The subject has a positive urine drug test at screening.
18. The subject is female and is pregnant or breastfeeding at the time of the screening visit or plans to become pregnant during the study period.
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Zalicus
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Margaret Lee, PhD
Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR
Zalicus Inc
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Investigative Site
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Investigative Site
Peoria, Arizona, United States
Investigative Site
Anaheim, California, United States
Investigative Site
Fresno, California, United States
Investigative Site
Orange, California, United States
Investigative Site
Sacramento, California, United States
Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Investigative Site
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Investigative Site
Orlando, Florida, United States
Investigative Site
Pinellas Park, Florida, United States
Investigative Site
Plantation, Florida, United States
Investigative Site
Royal Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Investigative Site
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Investigative Site
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Investigative Site
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Investigative Site
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Investigative Site
Hazelwood, Missouri, United States
Investigative Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, United States
Investigative Site
Medford, Oregon, United States
Investigative Site
Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States
Investigative Site
Dallas, Texas, United States
Investigative Site
Sandy City, Utah, United States
Investigative Site
Bellevue, Washington, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
Z160-LSR-201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id