Randomized Trial of Cryotherapy Duration Prior to High Dose Melphalan in Myeloma Patients
NCT ID: NCT01653106
Last Updated: 2017-06-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
148 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-04-30
2015-03-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Autologous Bone Marrow Transplantation in Acute Non-Lymphoblastic Leukemia During First or Subsequent Remission
NCT00186381
S0125, Chemotherapy, Total-Body Irradiation, and Peripheral Stem Cell Transplantation in Treating Older Patients With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00053014
Intensity Modulated Total Marrow Irradiation, Fludarabine Phosphate, and Melphalan in Treating Patients With Relapsed Hematologic Cancers Undergoing a Second Donor Stem Cell Transplant
NCT02333162
Amifostine and Combination Chemotherapy in Treating Patients With Newly Diagnosed Acute Myeloid Leukemia
NCT00003268
Refining the Role of Mid-induction Bone Marrow Biopsy in Acute Myeloid Leukemia: A Pilot Study
NCT06323590
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
I. To measure the maximum inpatient mucositis grade after 120- vs. 360-minutes standardized cryotherapy regimens in patients with multiple myeloma undergoing autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation at Ohio State Medical Center.
SECONDARY OBJECTIVES:
I. To develop a pharmacokinetic model predicting variability in unbound serum melphalan area under the concentration-time curve (AUC).
II. To compare the neutropenic fever and bacteremia incidence after 120- vs. 360-minute cryotherapy regimens.
III. To compare patient-reported mucositis-related symptoms up until discharge utilizing the Patient-Reported Oral Mucositis Symptoms Scale (PROMS) after 120- vs 360-minute cryotherapy regimens.
OUTLINE: Patients are randomized to 1 of 2 treatment arms.
ARM I: Beginning fifteen minutes before melphalan treatment, patients receive 1 ounce of shaved ice in their mouth, allow it to melt and then replenish it immediately for 120 minutes.
ARM II: Beginning fifteen minutes before melphalan treatment, patients receive 1 ounce of shaved ice in their mouth, allow it to melt and then replenish it immediately for 360 minutes.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Arm I (cryotherapy 120 minutes)
Beginning fifteen minutes before melphalan treatment, patients receive 1 ounce of shaved ice in their mouth, allow it to melt and then replenish it immediately for 120 minutes.
cryotherapy
Receive shaved ice
questionnaire administration
Participate in PROMS
pharmacological study
Correlative studies
Arm II (cryotherapy 360 minutes)
Beginning fifteen minutes before melphalan treatment, patients receive 1 ounce of shaved ice in their mouth, allow it to melt and then replenish it immediately for 360 minutes.
cryotherapy
Receive shaved ice
questionnaire administration
Participate in PROMS
pharmacological study
Correlative studies
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
cryotherapy
Receive shaved ice
questionnaire administration
Participate in PROMS
pharmacological study
Correlative studies
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Age \> 18 years
* Patients or their legal representatives must be able to read, understand and provide informed consent to participate in the trial
Exclusion Criteria
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Ohio State University Comprehensive Cancer Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Craig Hofmeister
Principal Investigator
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Craig Hofmeister, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Ohio State University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Ohio State University Medical Center
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Poi MJ, Li J, Sborov DW, VanGundy Z, Cho YK, Lamprecht M, Pichiorri F, Phelps MA, Hofmeister CC. Polymorphism in ANRIL is associated with relapse in patients with multiple myeloma after autologous stem cell transplant. Mol Carcinog. 2017 Jul;56(7):1722-1732. doi: 10.1002/mc.22626. Epub 2017 Feb 16.
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Jamesline
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
NCI-2012-00459
Identifier Type: REGISTRY
Identifier Source: secondary_id
OSU-11055
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.