Testing of Drugs Erlotinib and Docetaxel in Lung Cancer Patients Classified Regarding Their Outlook Using VeriStrat®.
NCT ID: NCT01652469
Last Updated: 2022-08-24
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
81 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-08-31
2015-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
It is hypothesized that the VeriStrat test results are able to predict the benefit of treatment with erlotinib vs docetaxel. This would suggest a significant improvement in progression-free survival for VSG patients when treated with Erlotinib, and no significant improvement in VSP patients who receive the same treatment.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Clinical Effectiveness Assessment of VeriStrat® Testing and Validation of Immunotherapy Tests in NSCLC Subjects
NCT03289780
Docetaxel, Cisplatin, and Erlotinib Hydrochloride in Treating Patients With Stage I-III Non-small Cell Lung Cancer Following Surgery
NCT00254384
Erlotinib and Docetaxel in Second Line of Treatment in Patients With Non Small Cell Lung Cancer
NCT01350817
A Phase 2, Study of Ficlatuzumab Plus Erlotinib vs. Placebo Plus Erlotinib in Subjects With Previously Untreated Metastatic, EGFR-mutated NSCLC and BDX004 Positive Label
NCT02318368
Docetaxel and Erlotinib in Treating Patients With Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer or Other Solid Tumors
NCT00390429
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
1. Explore the predictive ability of the VeriStrat signature, by testing for interaction between treatment arms (Arm A: erlotinib vs Arm B: docetaxel) and VeriStrat status (VSG vs VSP) using as outcome progression free survival.
2. Explore whether treatment with erlotinib provides progression free survival benefit as compared to docetaxel in the VSG group.
3. Compare progression free survival in the two treatment arms (Arm A: erlotinib vs Arm B: docetaxel) in the VSP group.
4. Explore the prognostic ability of the VeriStrat signature by testing for an overall difference in progression free survival between the two VeriStrat groups (in case of no significant interaction).
5. Explore the predictive ability of the VeriStrat signature using the secondary measures of clinical efficacy including overall survival, objective response rate, and disease control rate.
6. Compare overall survival, objective response rate and disease control rate between treatment groups separately in the VSG and VSP groups.
7. Explore the prognostic ability of the VeriStrat signature by testing for an overall difference in overall survival, objective response rate and disease control rate between the two VeriStrat groups (in case of no significant interaction).
8. Assess the safety and the tolerability of the two treatments separately in each VeriStrat group and overall.
Recruitment period: 18 months Sample Size: 500
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
A: Erlotinib
Erlotinib in standard dose. Until progression (clinical or radiological) or unacceptable toxicity.
Erlotinib
Erlotinib 150 mg/day p.o. continuously with 21 days cycle.
B: Docetaxel
Docetaxel in standard dose. Until progression (clinical or radiological) or unacceptable toxicity.
Docetaxel
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 as an IV infusion every 21 days.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Erlotinib
Erlotinib 150 mg/day p.o. continuously with 21 days cycle.
Docetaxel
Docetaxel 75 mg/m2 as an IV infusion every 21 days.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Progressive disease upon or after previous chemotherapy including at least one line of platinum-based chemotherapy.
* Measurable or evaluable disease according to RECIST v1.1 (Appendix 2).
* ECOG PS 0-2.
* Age ≥ 18 years.
* Adequate organ function, including:
* Adequate bone marrow reserve: ANC \> 1.5 x 109/L, platelets \> 100 x 109/L.
* Hepatic: bilirubin \<1.5 x ULN; AP, ALT \< 3.0 x ULN; AP, ALT \<5 x ULN is acceptable in case of liver metastasis.
* Renal: calculated creatinine clearance \> 40 ml/min based on the Cockroft and Gault formula.
* Signed and dated informed consent form.
* Male and female patients with reproductive potential must use an approved contraceptive method, during the trial and 12 months thereafter. Female patients with reproductive potential must have a negative pregnancy test within 7 days prior to study registration.
* Estimated life expectancy \>12 weeks.
* Patient compliance and geographical proximity that allow adequate follow-up.
Exclusion Criteria
* Previous treatment with any EGFR-TKI or docetaxel.
* Documented brain metastases unless the patient has completed local therapy for central nervous system metastases and has been off corticosteroids for at least 14 days prior to study registration.
* Documented presence of activating EGFR mutations, if the patient was tested for EGFR mutations.
* Previous malignancy within the past 5 years with the exception of adequately treated cervical carcinoma in situ, breast cancer in situ or localized non-melanoma skin cancer.
* Psychiatric disorder precluding understanding of information on trial related topics, giving informed consent, or interfering with compliance for oral drug intake.
* Concurrent treatment with experimental drugs or other anti-cancer therapy treatment in a clinical trial within 21 days prior to study registration.
* Known hypersensitivity to trial drugs or hypersensitivity to any other component of the trial drugs or any concomitant drugs contraindicated.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Biodesix, Inc.
INDUSTRY
ETOP IBCSG Partners Foundation
NETWORK
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Solange Peters, MD-PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Vaudois, 1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
Egbert Smit, MD-PhD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Vrije Universiteit VU, Medical Centre, 1007MB Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Rolf Stahel, MD
Role: STUDY_CHAIR
Laboratory of Molecular Oncology, Clinic of Oncology, University Hospital Zürich, 8044 Zürich, Switzerland
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Krankenhaus Hietzing
Vienna, , Austria
Institut Jules Bordet
Brussels, , Belgium
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus, , Denmark
University Hospital of Heraklion
Heraklion, , Greece
National Institute of Oncology
Budapest, , Hungary
St James's Hospital
Dublin, , Ireland
Institution Rabin MC
Petah Tikwa, , Israel
Tel-Aviv Medical Center
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Medical Oncology, Second University Naples
Naples, , Italy
Vercelli Teaching Hospital
Vercelli, , Italy
Free University Medical Center
Amsterdam, , Netherlands
Hospital general de Alicante
Alicante, , Spain
Hospital Clínic Barcelona
Barcelona, , Spain
Institut Català d'Oncologia - L'Hospitalet
Barcelona, , Spain
Hospital San Pedro de Alcantara
Cáceres, , Spain
Ciudad Real General University Hospital
Ciudad Real, , Spain
Onkologikoa
Donostia / San Sebastian, , Spain
Hospital Severo Ochoa
Leganés, , Spain
Hospital 12 de Octubre
Madrid, , Spain
Carlos Haya Hospital
Málaga, , Spain
Hospital Universitari Sant Joan
Reus, , Spain
Hospital Arnau Vilanova Valencia
Valencia, , Spain
Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia
Valencia, , Spain
Hospital La Fe
Valencia, , Spain
University Hospital Basel
Basel, , Switzerland
Kantonsspital Graubünden
Chur, , Switzerland
Fondation du centre Pluridisciplinaire d'Oncologie (CePO)
Lausanne, , Switzerland
Kantonsspital Luzern
Lucerne, , Switzerland
Onkologiezentrum Berner Oberland
Thun, , Switzerland
Universitätsspital Zürich
Zurich, , Switzerland
University Hospital South Manchester
Manchester, , United Kingdom
Weston Park Hospital
Sheffield, , United Kingdom
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Di Maio M, Chiodini P, Georgoulias V, Hatzidaki D, Takeda K, Wachters FM, Gebbia V, Smit EF, Morabito A, Gallo C, Perrone F, Gridelli C. Meta-analysis of single-agent chemotherapy compared with combination chemotherapy as second-line treatment of advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2009 Apr 10;27(11):1836-43. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2008.17.5844. Epub 2009 Mar 9.
Shepherd FA, Dancey J, Ramlau R, Mattson K, Gralla R, O'Rourke M, Levitan N, Gressot L, Vincent M, Burkes R, Coughlin S, Kim Y, Berille J. Prospective randomized trial of docetaxel versus best supportive care in patients with non-small-cell lung cancer previously treated with platinum-based chemotherapy. J Clin Oncol. 2000 May;18(10):2095-103. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2000.18.10.2095.
Shepherd FA, Rodrigues Pereira J, Ciuleanu T, Tan EH, Hirsh V, Thongprasert S, Campos D, Maoleekoonpiroj S, Smylie M, Martins R, van Kooten M, Dediu M, Findlay B, Tu D, Johnston D, Bezjak A, Clark G, Santabarbara P, Seymour L; National Cancer Institute of Canada Clinical Trials Group. Erlotinib in previously treated non-small-cell lung cancer. N Engl J Med. 2005 Jul 14;353(2):123-32. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa050753.
Taguchi F, Solomon B, Gregorc V, Roder H, Gray R, Kasahara K, Nishio M, Brahmer J, Spreafico A, Ludovini V, Massion PP, Dziadziuszko R, Schiller J, Grigorieva J, Tsypin M, Hunsucker SW, Caprioli R, Duncan MW, Hirsch FR, Bunn PA Jr, Carbone DP. Mass spectrometry to classify non-small-cell lung cancer patients for clinical outcome after treatment with epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors: a multicohort cross-institutional study. J Natl Cancer Inst. 2007 Jun 6;99(11):838-46. doi: 10.1093/jnci/djk195.
Yildiz PB, Shyr Y, Rahman JS, Wardwell NR, Zimmerman LJ, Shakhtour B, Gray WH, Chen S, Li M, Roder H, Liebler DC, Bigbee WL, Siegfried JM, Weissfeld JL, Gonzalez AL, Ninan M, Johnson DH, Carbone DP, Caprioli RM, Massion PP. Diagnostic accuracy of MALDI mass spectrometric analysis of unfractionated serum in lung cancer. J Thorac Oncol. 2007 Oct;2(10):893-901. doi: 10.1097/JTO.0b013e31814b8be7.
Sargent DJ, Conley BA, Allegra C, Collette L. Clinical trial designs for predictive marker validation in cancer treatment trials. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):2020-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.01.112.
Pocock SJ, Simon R. Sequential treatment assignment with balancing for prognostic factors in the controlled clinical trial. Biometrics. 1975 Mar;31(1):103-15.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: Statistical Analysis Plan
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: moc figures SAP
Document Type: Statistical Analysis Plan: moc tables SAP
Document Type: Informed Consent Form
Related Links
Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.
Related information
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2012-001896-35
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
ETOP3-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.