Compare the Effectiveness Between Existing Treatment and New Treatment
NCT ID: NCT01640587
Last Updated: 2023-01-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
NA
76 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2013-11-30
2017-03-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Evidence of reduced susceptibility to artemisinins in Western Cambodia was first reported in January 2007. Artemisinin resistance was manifest by a marked slowing of parasite clearance. A more recent analysis of parasite clearance data collected prospectively in patients with uncomplicated hyperparasitaemic malaria has shown a progressive decline in parasite clearance rates over the last decade suggesting a decline following the same trajectory as in Western Cambodia but with a time lag of a few years.
Surveillance data collected in 2011 have shown a dramatic and worrying decline in efficacy of MAS3, albeit in a small number of patients. This decline in efficacy of mefloquine + artesunate is likely to be attributable to reduced parasite susceptibility to mefloquine. The other fixed dose combinations available dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) is the best option to replace mefloquine-artesunate since it is thought that it remains effective in the presence of high pfmdr1 copy numbers. In addition DP is administered once daily and needs no special dietary modification to ensure adequate absorption.
In this study it is hypothesised that efficacy of DP (estimated to be 95%) will be significantly higher than that of MAS3 (estimated to be 65%), therefore the investigators propose to conduct a randomised controlled trial between DP and MAS3 for the treatment of P.falciparum.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Efficacy, Safety, and Tolerability of Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine + Mefloquine Compared to Dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine or Artesunate-mefloquine in Patients With Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Cambodia
NCT02612545
Arterolane-PQP Versus DHA-PQP in Uncomplicated Falciparum Malaria in Eastern Myanmar
NCT02461186
Efficacy of Artesunate-Mefloquine Combination Therapy in Trat Province, Thailand
NCT01659281
Randomised Trial of 3 Artemisinin Combination Therapy for Malaria in Pregnancy
NCT01054248
Evaluating the Efficacy of Artesunate-mefloquine and the Relative Roles of Resistance Genetic Markers
NCT02427360
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Evidence of reduced susceptibility to artemisinins in Western Cambodia was first reported in January 2007. Artemisinin resistance was manifest by a marked slowing of parasite clearance. In Pailin, Cambodia, the median parasite clearance time was 84 hours compared to 48 hours on the Thai side of the international border with Myanmar following either 2 mg/kg of artesunate (AS) alone for 7 days or 4 mg/kg AS for 3 days plus 25 mg/kg of mefloquine at both locations. A more recent analysis of parasite clearance data collected prospectively in patients with uncomplicated hyperparasitaemic malaria has shown a progressive decline in parasite clearance rates over the last decade suggesting a decline following the same trajectory as in Western Cambodia but with a time lag of a few years.
Clinic experience data collected in 2011 have shown a steady decline in efficacy of MAS3, albeit in a small number of patients. We have observed this trend over the past 10 years. It appears to be related to the increased copies of the gene Pfmdr1 in adult males. The PCR corrected efficacy in 43 patients was 47.0% (95% CI 27.0-64.7), well below the 90% threshold at which WHO recommends changing to an alternative treatment. This decline in efficacy of mefloquine + artesunate is likely to be attributable to reduced parasite susceptibility to mefloquine. The other fixed dose combinations available dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) is the best option to replace mefloquine-artesunate since it is thought that it remains effective in the presence of high pfmdr1 copy numbers. In addition DP is administered once daily and needs no special dietary modification to ensure adequate absorption.
However other groups in the area have documented a good efficacy of MAS3. In other words we think there is a decline in efficacy but we do not feel confident to say what the magnitude of this drop is. Changing policy is a difficult task and we need more and stronger evidence of the current efficacy of MAS3. The best design to avoid selection bias is to do an adequately powered randomized control trial and we would like to compare MAS3 with the next generation ACT: DP. We have already conducted studies with DP and we know it is safe and effective. In laboratory studies we found that this treatment (DP) is more effective against P.falciparum when it exhibits resistance to mefloquine via increased expression of the Pfmdr1 gene. We think it is timely to compare MAS3 and DP again and carefully monitor for the treatment response in patients with signs of mefloquine resistant parasites. Therefore, we propose a study to evaluate in an adequately powered RCT MAS3 (the current national policy for Thailand and routinely use along the border) to a potential replacement, DP.
Due to a lack of malaria patients at clinics, the trial was terminated. There will be no further analysis and or publication of the results.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
DP
2.4 mg/kg dihydroartemisinin AND 20 mg/kg piperaquine once daily on Days 0, 1 and 2
Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine
DHA-Piperaquine (Duo-Cotecxin® Beijing Holley-Cotec Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, China) One tablet contains 40mg of dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine. A weight-based regimen containing 2.4 mg/kg DHA and 20 mg/kg PPQ once daily for 3 days
MAS3
4mg/kg artesunate AND 8 mg/kg mefloquine once daily on Days 0, 1 and 2
Mefloquine+Artesunate
One tablet of artesunate contains 40mg (Guilin Pharmaceutical Company, PRC). One tablet of mefloquine contains 250 mg mefloquine (Eloquine® (Medochemie Ltd., Cyprus) Standard three days regimen of artesunate-mefloquine given as 4mg/kg artesunate/day and 8 mg/kg of mefloquine/day on Days 0, 1 and 2
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Mefloquine+Artesunate
One tablet of artesunate contains 40mg (Guilin Pharmaceutical Company, PRC). One tablet of mefloquine contains 250 mg mefloquine (Eloquine® (Medochemie Ltd., Cyprus) Standard three days regimen of artesunate-mefloquine given as 4mg/kg artesunate/day and 8 mg/kg of mefloquine/day on Days 0, 1 and 2
Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine
DHA-Piperaquine (Duo-Cotecxin® Beijing Holley-Cotec Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, China) One tablet contains 40mg of dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine. A weight-based regimen containing 2.4 mg/kg DHA and 20 mg/kg PPQ once daily for 3 days
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Symptomatic of malaria infection, i.e. history of fever or presence of fever \>37.5°c.
* microscopically confirmed asexual stages of Plasmodium falciparum ≥ 5/500 wbc (may be mixed with non- P.falciparum species) .
* Written informed consent given to participate in the trial.
* Participant or parent/guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
* Participant or guardian is able to understand and participant can complete the study requirements
Exclusion Criteria
* P.falciparum asexual stage parasitaemia greater than or equal to 4% red blood cells (175 000/µL).
* Signs or symptoms indicative of severe malaria:
* Impaired consciousness
* Severe anaemia (Hct\<15%)
* Bleeding disorder -evidenced by epistaxis, bleeding gums, frank haematuria, bleeding from venepuncture sites.
* Respiratory distress
* Severe jaundice
* Patients who received any P. falciparum treatment within 2 months
* Known hypersensitivity to artemisinins - defined as history of erythroderma/ other severe cutaneous reaction, angioedema or anaphylaxis.
* History of epilepsy and other neurological disorders
* Splenectomy
5 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of Oxford
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Francois Nosten, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
University of Oxford
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Shoklo Malaria Research Unit
Mae Sot, Changwat Tak, Thailand
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SMRU1201
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.