Compare the Effectiveness Between Existing Treatment and New Treatment

NCT ID: NCT01640587

Last Updated: 2023-01-10

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

TERMINATED

Clinical Phase

NA

Total Enrollment

76 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2013-11-30

Study Completion Date

2017-03-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

In camps for displaced persons located along the Thai-Myanmar border, mefloquine and artesunate combination therapy has been used since 1992. In vivo efficacy of a 3 day regimen of mefloquine + artesunate (MAS3) has been monitored regularly since its introduction in 1992. In 2009 Carrara et al summarised the in vivo PCR-adjusted cure rates at Day 42 and Day 63 in patients treated with MAS3 between 1995 and 2005, as well as the in-vitro parasite susceptibility to MAS3 during that same period, and the changes in pfmdr1 copy numbers.The proportion of patients with parasitaemia persisting on day-2 increased significantly from 4.5% before 2001 to 21.9% after 2002 (p\<0.001). Delayed parasite clearance was associated with increased risk of developing gametocytaemia (AOR = 2.29; 95% CI, 2.00-2.69, p = 0.002). MAS3 efficacy declined slightly but significantly (Hazards ratio 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19, p\<0.001), although efficacy in 2007 remained well within acceptable limits: 96.5% (95% CI, 91.0-98.7). The proportion of infections caused by parasites with increased pfmdr1 copy number rose from 30% (12/40) in 1996 to 53% (24/45) in 2006 (p = 0.012, test for trend).

Evidence of reduced susceptibility to artemisinins in Western Cambodia was first reported in January 2007. Artemisinin resistance was manifest by a marked slowing of parasite clearance. A more recent analysis of parasite clearance data collected prospectively in patients with uncomplicated hyperparasitaemic malaria has shown a progressive decline in parasite clearance rates over the last decade suggesting a decline following the same trajectory as in Western Cambodia but with a time lag of a few years.

Surveillance data collected in 2011 have shown a dramatic and worrying decline in efficacy of MAS3, albeit in a small number of patients. This decline in efficacy of mefloquine + artesunate is likely to be attributable to reduced parasite susceptibility to mefloquine. The other fixed dose combinations available dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) is the best option to replace mefloquine-artesunate since it is thought that it remains effective in the presence of high pfmdr1 copy numbers. In addition DP is administered once daily and needs no special dietary modification to ensure adequate absorption.

In this study it is hypothesised that efficacy of DP (estimated to be 95%) will be significantly higher than that of MAS3 (estimated to be 65%), therefore the investigators propose to conduct a randomised controlled trial between DP and MAS3 for the treatment of P.falciparum.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

In camps for displaced persons located along the Thai-Myanmar border, mefloquine and artesunate combination therapy has been used since 1992. It was studied first in trials, but by 1994 it became the first line treatment for all uncomplicated P. falciparum malaria episodes in the non-pregnant population. In vivo efficacy of a 3 day regimen of mefloquine+ artesunate (MAS3) has been monitored regularly since its introduction in 1992. In 2009 Carrara et al summarised the in vivo PCR-adjusted cure rates at Day 42 and Day 63 in patients treated with MAS3 between 1995 and 2005, as well as the in-vitro parasite susceptibility to MAS3 during that same period, and the changes in pfmdr1 copy numbers.The proportion of patients with parasitaemia persisting on day-2 increased significantly from 4.5% before 2001 to 21.9% after 2002 (p\<0.001). Delayed parasite clearance was associated with increased risk of developing gametocytaemia (AOR = 2.29; 95% CI, 2.00-2.69, p = 0.002). MAS3 efficacy declined slightly but significantly (Hazards ratio 1.13; 95% CI, 1.07-1.19, p\<0.001), although efficacy in 2007 remained well within acceptable limits: 96.5% (95% CI, 91.0-98.7). The proportion of infections caused by parasites with increased pfmdr1 copy number rose from 30% (12/40) in 1996 to 53% (24/45) in 2006 (p = 0.012, test for trend).

Evidence of reduced susceptibility to artemisinins in Western Cambodia was first reported in January 2007. Artemisinin resistance was manifest by a marked slowing of parasite clearance. In Pailin, Cambodia, the median parasite clearance time was 84 hours compared to 48 hours on the Thai side of the international border with Myanmar following either 2 mg/kg of artesunate (AS) alone for 7 days or 4 mg/kg AS for 3 days plus 25 mg/kg of mefloquine at both locations. A more recent analysis of parasite clearance data collected prospectively in patients with uncomplicated hyperparasitaemic malaria has shown a progressive decline in parasite clearance rates over the last decade suggesting a decline following the same trajectory as in Western Cambodia but with a time lag of a few years.

Clinic experience data collected in 2011 have shown a steady decline in efficacy of MAS3, albeit in a small number of patients. We have observed this trend over the past 10 years. It appears to be related to the increased copies of the gene Pfmdr1 in adult males. The PCR corrected efficacy in 43 patients was 47.0% (95% CI 27.0-64.7), well below the 90% threshold at which WHO recommends changing to an alternative treatment. This decline in efficacy of mefloquine + artesunate is likely to be attributable to reduced parasite susceptibility to mefloquine. The other fixed dose combinations available dihydroartemisinin-piperaquine (DP) is the best option to replace mefloquine-artesunate since it is thought that it remains effective in the presence of high pfmdr1 copy numbers. In addition DP is administered once daily and needs no special dietary modification to ensure adequate absorption.

However other groups in the area have documented a good efficacy of MAS3. In other words we think there is a decline in efficacy but we do not feel confident to say what the magnitude of this drop is. Changing policy is a difficult task and we need more and stronger evidence of the current efficacy of MAS3. The best design to avoid selection bias is to do an adequately powered randomized control trial and we would like to compare MAS3 with the next generation ACT: DP. We have already conducted studies with DP and we know it is safe and effective. In laboratory studies we found that this treatment (DP) is more effective against P.falciparum when it exhibits resistance to mefloquine via increased expression of the Pfmdr1 gene. We think it is timely to compare MAS3 and DP again and carefully monitor for the treatment response in patients with signs of mefloquine resistant parasites. Therefore, we propose a study to evaluate in an adequately powered RCT MAS3 (the current national policy for Thailand and routinely use along the border) to a potential replacement, DP.

Due to a lack of malaria patients at clinics, the trial was terminated. There will be no further analysis and or publication of the results.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

P. Falciparum Malaria

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

NONE

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

DP

2.4 mg/kg dihydroartemisinin AND 20 mg/kg piperaquine once daily on Days 0, 1 and 2

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine

Intervention Type DRUG

DHA-Piperaquine (Duo-Cotecxin® Beijing Holley-Cotec Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, China) One tablet contains 40mg of dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine. A weight-based regimen containing 2.4 mg/kg DHA and 20 mg/kg PPQ once daily for 3 days

MAS3

4mg/kg artesunate AND 8 mg/kg mefloquine once daily on Days 0, 1 and 2

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mefloquine+Artesunate

Intervention Type DRUG

One tablet of artesunate contains 40mg (Guilin Pharmaceutical Company, PRC). One tablet of mefloquine contains 250 mg mefloquine (Eloquine® (Medochemie Ltd., Cyprus) Standard three days regimen of artesunate-mefloquine given as 4mg/kg artesunate/day and 8 mg/kg of mefloquine/day on Days 0, 1 and 2

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Mefloquine+Artesunate

One tablet of artesunate contains 40mg (Guilin Pharmaceutical Company, PRC). One tablet of mefloquine contains 250 mg mefloquine (Eloquine® (Medochemie Ltd., Cyprus) Standard three days regimen of artesunate-mefloquine given as 4mg/kg artesunate/day and 8 mg/kg of mefloquine/day on Days 0, 1 and 2

Intervention Type DRUG

Dihydroartemisinin-Piperaquine

DHA-Piperaquine (Duo-Cotecxin® Beijing Holley-Cotec Pharmaceuticals Co., Ltd, China) One tablet contains 40mg of dihydroartemisinin and 320 mg piperaquine. A weight-based regimen containing 2.4 mg/kg DHA and 20 mg/kg PPQ once daily for 3 days

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Eloquine® Duo-Cotecxin®

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Age ≥ 5 years
* Symptomatic of malaria infection, i.e. history of fever or presence of fever \>37.5°c.
* microscopically confirmed asexual stages of Plasmodium falciparum ≥ 5/500 wbc (may be mixed with non- P.falciparum species) .
* Written informed consent given to participate in the trial.
* Participant or parent/guardian is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
* Participant or guardian is able to understand and participant can complete the study requirements

Exclusion Criteria

* Pregnancy or lactation (urine test for β HCG to be performed on any woman of child bearing age unless menstruating).
* P.falciparum asexual stage parasitaemia greater than or equal to 4% red blood cells (175 000/µL).
* Signs or symptoms indicative of severe malaria:

* Impaired consciousness
* Severe anaemia (Hct\<15%)
* Bleeding disorder -evidenced by epistaxis, bleeding gums, frank haematuria, bleeding from venepuncture sites.
* Respiratory distress
* Severe jaundice
* Patients who received any P. falciparum treatment within 2 months
* Known hypersensitivity to artemisinins - defined as history of erythroderma/ other severe cutaneous reaction, angioedema or anaphylaxis.
* History of epilepsy and other neurological disorders
* Splenectomy
Minimum Eligible Age

5 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of Oxford

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Francois Nosten, MD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

University of Oxford

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Shoklo Malaria Research Unit

Mae Sot, Changwat Tak, Thailand

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Thailand

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

SMRU1201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.

Study on the Treatment of Vivax Malaria
NCT01074905 COMPLETED PHASE3