Trial Outcomes & Findings for Randomized Switch Study From Hydroxyurea to Ruxolitinib for RELIEF of Polycythemia Vera Symptoms: The Relief Study (NCT NCT01632904)
NCT ID: NCT01632904
Last Updated: 2017-11-14
Results Overview
Symptoms of polycythemia vera were assessed using a modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) electronic diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake. The total symptom score ranged from 0-50 and was calculated as the sum of the 5 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
COMPLETED
PHASE3
110 participants
From Baseline to Week 16
2017-11-14
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
54
|
56
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
47
|
50
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
7
|
6
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Adverse Event
|
4
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Physician Decision
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Subject decision
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Disease Progression
|
0
|
1
|
|
Overall Study
Reason for discontinuation not available
|
0
|
1
|
Baseline Characteristics
Randomized Switch Study From Hydroxyurea to Ruxolitinib for RELIEF of Polycythemia Vera Symptoms: The Relief Study
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=54 Participants
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
n=56 Participants
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Total
n=110 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
63.1 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.68 • n=5 Participants
|
64.2 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.68 • n=7 Participants
|
63.7 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.15 • n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
30 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
22 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
52 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
24 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
34 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
58 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
White or Caucasian
|
53 participants
n=5 Participants
|
56 participants
n=7 Participants
|
109 participants
n=5 Participants
|
|
Race/Ethnicity, Customized
Asian
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 participants
n=5 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT); all subjects randomized in the study. For the overall TSS-C score, only those subjects with a baseline score of 0 and a Week 16 score of 0 or missing were excluded from the analysis.
Symptoms of polycythemia vera were assessed using a modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) electronic diary. Using the diary, patients rated the following symptoms on a scale from 0 (absent) to 10 (worst imaginable): tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake. The total symptom score ranged from 0-50 and was calculated as the sum of the 5 symptom scores. A higher score indicates worse symptoms.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=53 Participants
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
n=54 Participants
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving a ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine (TSS-C) at Week 16, as Measured by the Modified Myeloproliferative Neoplasm Symptom Assessment Form (MPN-SAF) Diary
|
43.4 Percentage of participants
|
29.6 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: From Baseline to Week 16Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT); all subjects randomized in the study. For individual symptom scores within the TSS-C cluster, only those subjects with a baseline score of 0 and a Week 16 score of 0 or missing were excluded from the analysis.
The TSS-C cluster includes tiredness, itching, muscle aches, night sweats, and sweats while awake.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=53 Participants
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
n=54 Participants
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16
Tiredness (n= 50, 53)
|
40.0 Percentage of participants
|
26.4 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16
Itching (n= 48, 50)
|
54.2 Percentage of participants
|
32.0 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16
Muscle aches (n= 47, 49)
|
38.3 Percentage of participants
|
30.6 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16
Night sweats (n= 42, 48)
|
47.6 Percentage of participants
|
41.7 Percentage of participants
|
|
Percentage of Subjects Achieving ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in the Individual Symptom Scores for TSS-C at Week 16
Sweats while awake (n= 42, 46)
|
54.8 Percentage of participants
|
34.8 Percentage of participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Week 48Population: Intent-to-Treat (ITT); all subjects randomized to Ruxolitinib in the study. For TSS-C/individual symptoms, subject without baseline value was excluded from the analysis.
Durable Response on TSS-C/individual symptoms defined as a ≥ 50% reduction in TSS-C/individual symptoms at Week 16 that were maintained at Week 48
Outcome measures
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=54 Participants
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48
Night sweats
|
29.6 percentage of participants
Interval 18.0 to 43.6
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48
TSS-C
|
31.5 percentage of participants
Interval 19.5 to 45.6
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48
Tiredness
|
24.1 percentage of participants
Interval 13.5 to 37.6
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48
Itching
|
37.0 percentage of participants
Interval 24.3 to 51.3
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48
Muscle aches
|
20.4 percentage of participants
Interval 10.6 to 33.5
|
—
|
|
Proportion of Subjects Randomized to Ruxolitinib Who Achieved ≥ 50% Improvement From Baseline in Total Symptom Score-Cytokine and the Individual Symptom Scores at Week 16 That Were Maintained at Week 48
Sweats while awake
|
37.0 percentage of participants
Interval 24.3 to 51.3
|
—
|
Adverse Events
Ruxolitinib
Hydroxyurea
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=54 participants at risk
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
n=56 participants at risk
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Cardiac disorders
Angina unstable
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Arterial occlusive disease
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Cerebral ischemia
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Chest discomfort
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count increased
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Spondylolisthesis
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Deep vein thrombosis
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hematuria
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Hemoglobin decreased
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Renal failure acute
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urosepsis
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
Ruxolitinib
n=54 participants at risk
Ruxolitinib will be orally self-administered at a starting dose of 10 mg (two 5 mg tablets) twice a day. Dose increases of 5 mg (1 tablet) in twice-daily increments are permitted after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy for subjects who meet prespecified criteria for inadequate efficacy.
HU-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the ruxolitinib dose, the dose of HU-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
Hydroxyurea
n=56 participants at risk
Hydroxyurea (HU) (500 mg capsules) will be orally self-administered at the dose that the subject was receiving previously. The dose may be increased after 4 weeks and again after 8 weeks of therapy to optimize efficacy for subjects meeting prespecified criteria.
Ruxolitinib-placebo All placebo will be self-administered, and dosing will be the same as with the blinded dose.
When adjustments are made to the HU dose, the dose of ruxolitinib-placebo will be adjusted concurrently.
|
|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
16.7%
9/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Rash
|
11.1%
6/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Fatigue
|
20.4%
11/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
10.7%
6/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Anemia
|
14.8%
8/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
8.9%
5/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Nausea
|
11.1%
6/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
7.4%
4/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain upper
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
Contusion
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Eye disorders
Vision blurred
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Weight increased
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Dizziness
|
13.0%
7/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
8.9%
5/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Hyperhidrosis
|
7.4%
4/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Insomnia
|
7.4%
4/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Alopecia
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Dyspnea
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Night sweats
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Edema peripheral
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Blood lactate dehydrogenase increased
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dry mouth
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Dyspepsia
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Neck pain
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytosis
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Muscle spasms
|
7.4%
4/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal distension
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Disturbance in attention
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Myalgia
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Palpitations
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Ear and labyrinth disorders
Tinnitus
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Pruritus
|
11.1%
6/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
10.7%
6/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Abdominal pain
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Asthenia
|
5.6%
3/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Cough
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Paresthesia
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Pyrexia
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Arthralgia
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Vomiting
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Bronchitis
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Epistaxis
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
Erythema
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Leukopenia
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Nasopharyngitis
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Stomatitis
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypertension
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
7.1%
4/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Psychiatric disorders
Depression
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Gout
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Neutropenia
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Cardiac disorders
Atrial fibrillation
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Reproductive system and breast disorders
Benign prostatic hyperplasia
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Hydronephrosis
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperkalemia
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
1.8%
1/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
Hyperuricemia
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Vascular disorders
Hypotension
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Lymphadenopathy
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Neutrophil count decreased
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Weight decreased
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
3.6%
2/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Constipation
|
7.4%
4/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
12.5%
7/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
Thrombocytopenia
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
8.9%
5/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Back pain
|
1.9%
1/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
7.1%
4/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Investigations
Platelet count decreased
|
0.00%
0/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
5.4%
3/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Diarrhea
|
9.3%
5/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
19.6%
11/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
|
General disorders
Chest pain
|
3.7%
2/54 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
0.00%
0/56 • The duration of the study up to Week 16. This time frame defines the blinded, comparative phase of the study where the majority of patients remained on their original randomized assignment and exposure between ruxolitinib and hydroxyurea was similar.
|
Additional Information
Study Director
Incyte Corporation
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Following the first publication, the Institution and/or Principal Investigator may publish data or results from the Study, provided, however, that the Institution and/or Principal Investigator submits the proposed publication to the Sponsor for review at least sixty (60) days prior to the date of the proposed publication. Sponsor may remove from the proposed publication any information that is considered confidential and/or proprietary other than Study data and results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER