The Efficacy of Robot Assisted Group Cognitive Training in Elderly Adults Without Cognitive Impairment
NCT ID: NCT01596205
Last Updated: 2012-05-10
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
85 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-06-30
2012-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The advanced scientific technique allowed us to develop service robots designed to assist human work, which can be important with an increase in the aging population and high costs of elderly care. In this regard, the investigators considered robots for elderly's cognitive training and developed 17 cognitive programs in collaboration with Center for Intelligent Robotics at Korea Institute of Science and Technology.
The purposes of this study were to demonstrate the effects of the investigators newly developed robot assisted group cognitive training programs on the brain in older adults and to identify whether they can help to improve cognitive function or mood in the elderly compared to the conventional cognitive training or control group that were not involved in any cognitive training.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Evaluation of the Effects of the New Program for Cognitive Enhancement and Improvement in the Elderly
NCT03401775
Effects of Wearable Sensor-based Interactive Cognitive-motor Training in Older Adults.
NCT05983913
Effectiveness of Computerized Cognitive Training in the Elderly With Cognitive Impairment
NCT02480738
Effects of the Cognitive Enhancing ICT Contents in Patients With Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT03405857
Virtual Reality Cognitive Training for Older Adults With Mild Cognitive Impairment
NCT06392412
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Secondary outcomes Change in the brain functional network from the baseline to the postintervention assessment was also assessed as a secondary outcome ascertained by the analysis of resting state fMRI, which has been used to show correlated spontaneous activity within cortical and subcortical regions that are functionally related.
Further secondary outcomes were changes between the baseline and the post-intervention assessment on cognitive function measured by validated neuropsychological tests such as SNSB and CANTAB on participants' depressive and anxiety symptoms scored by Geriatric Depression Scale and Geriatric Anxiety Inventory respectively, on self reported memory problems measured by Korean Dementia Screenng Questionnaire, Multifactorial Memory Questionnaire and Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire, on functions of daily living acitivity measured by Bayer ADL, on quality of life measuared by WHOQOL-bref.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
PREVENTION
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Robot intervention
Participants were given baseline assessments and randomly assigned into 3 groups; 24 with robot assisted cognitive training group (Robot intervention group), 24 with experienced behavioral therapist group (Conventional intervention group), and 37 without cognitive training (Control group).It was explained that there was a waiting list, therefore, participants in control group had an opportunity to participate in cognitive training program after a delay of 12 weeks for the intervention.
Robot assisted cognitive training
We developed total 17 software programs for cognitive training with robot which were intended to develop for improvement of following cognitive function;5 programs for memory, 2 for language , 1 for reasoning, 3 for working memory or speed of processing, 2 for calculation and 4 for visuospatial function.
Conventional intervention
conventional cognitive training group - pen and pencil with experienced behavioral therapists
Conventional cognitive training group
Experienced behavioral therapists who had been clinical neuropsychologists for 2 years instructed the participants in cognitive training. Thearpists were familiarized with manuals for cognitive training before study inception, and were instructed to adhere to the manual but were allowed to distribute time flexibly among the programs in the same cognitive domain.
In all sessions of conventional intervention group, the behavioral therapists showed several questions or instructions on the screen and then the participants answered to the questions with verbal or written words using paper and pencil.
Control group
No interventions assigned to this group
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Robot assisted cognitive training
We developed total 17 software programs for cognitive training with robot which were intended to develop for improvement of following cognitive function;5 programs for memory, 2 for language , 1 for reasoning, 3 for working memory or speed of processing, 2 for calculation and 4 for visuospatial function.
Conventional cognitive training group
Experienced behavioral therapists who had been clinical neuropsychologists for 2 years instructed the participants in cognitive training. Thearpists were familiarized with manuals for cognitive training before study inception, and were instructed to adhere to the manual but were allowed to distribute time flexibly among the programs in the same cognitive domain.
In all sessions of conventional intervention group, the behavioral therapists showed several questions or instructions on the screen and then the participants answered to the questions with verbal or written words using paper and pencil.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* without dementia
* MMSE=26 or above
Exclusion Criteria
* had 6 years of education or under;
* were illiterate
* were unavailable during the testing and intervention periods of the study;
* had severe losses in vision or hearing; had major neurological or psychiatric illness history including any history of stroke, transient ischemic attack or traumatic brain injury;
* had a medication history which might affect on cognitive function such as acetylcholinesterase inhibitor or memantine
* had medical problems such as thyroid, liver and renal disease;
* had a significan structural abnormalities on their baseline brain MRI.
60 Years
ALL
Yes
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Samsung Medical Center
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Duk L. Na, MD,PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Samsung Medical Center
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, , South Korea
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Kim GH, Jeon S, Im K, Kwon H, Lee BH, Kim GY, Jeong H, Han NE, Seo SW, Cho H, Noh Y, Park SE, Kim H, Hwang JW, Yoon CW, Kim HJ, Ye BS, Chin JH, Kim JH, Suh MK, Lee JM, Kim ST, Choi MT, Kim MS, Heilman KM, Jeong JH, Na DL. Structural brain changes after traditional and robot-assisted multi-domain cognitive training in community-dwelling healthy elderly. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 21;10(4):e0123251. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0123251. eCollection 2015.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011-04-080
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.