Solifenacin Succinate Versus Fesoterodine A Comparison Trial for Urgency Symptoms
NCT ID: NCT01595152
Last Updated: 2012-05-16
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
60 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-05-31
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Objective 1: To advance the investigators understanding on the effect of solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD) on urinary urgency using a validated Urgency Severity and Impact Questionnaire (USIQ).
Hypothesis 1.1: The severity of urgency symptoms as measured by USIQ will change differently in women with OAB following a 3 month treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD).
Hypothesis 2.1: Condition-specific quality of life (QOL) as measured by USIQ will change differently in women with OAB following a 3 month treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD).
Objective 2: To advance the investigators understanding on the adverse events (AE's) of solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD).
Hypothesis 1.1: The severity and rate of AE's in women with OAB following a 3 month of treatment with solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) vs. fesoterodine (8mg OD) will be different.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Solifenacin Succinate Versus Tolterodine 4mg Once Daily
NCT00802373
Solifenacin Succinate 5mg or 10mg Once Daily in the Treatment of Urgency Symptoms
NCT00801944
A Trial To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Patients With Symptoms Of Overactive Bladder Including Nocturnal Urinary Urgency
NCT00911937
Dose-Finding Study To Evaluate The Efficacy, Tolerability And Safety Of Fesoterodine In Comparison To Placebo For Overactive Bladder.
NCT00561951
Solifenacin Succinate Versus Placebo in Inner City Women Ages 20-45 With Overactive Bladder
NCT00773552
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD)
solifenacin succinate
8 mg once daily for 60 days
fesoterodine (8mg OD)
fesoterodine
8 mg, once daily for 60 dyas
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
solifenacin succinate
8 mg once daily for 60 days
fesoterodine
8 mg, once daily for 60 dyas
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Have a clinical diagnosis of OAB (wet or dry) with urinary urgency
* Are seeking treatment for OAB
* No contraindication to solifenacin succinate (10 mg OD) or fesoterodine (8mg OD)
* Have a negative urine dipstick analysis
* Are able to consent and fill out study documents and complete all study visits
* Have not been treated with an anticholinergic medication in the past 1-month
Exclusion Criteria
* Are currently receiving treatment for OAB, including medications, physical and/or formal behavioral therapy, or electrical stimulation
* Have an elevated post -void residual volume by ultrasound or straight catheterization (PVR\>150 ml)
* Were treated for a urinary tract infection in the last month
* Have untreated narrow angle glaucoma
* Are unable to comprehend and complete study tasks
* Have an allergy to or had previously failed treatment with solifenacin succinate or fesoterodine
18 Years
80 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rambam Health Care Campus
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Lior Lowenstein
Head Of Urgoyncology Service
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Anna Padoa, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Assaf-Harofeh Medical Center
Haim Krissi, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Belinson Medical center
David Shveiky, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Hadassa
Naama Marcus, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rebecca ziv
Lior Lowenstein, MD, MS
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rambam Health Care Campus
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Rambam Health Care Campus
Haifa, , Israel
Hadassah
Jerusalem, , Israel
Belinson
Petah Tikva, , Israel
Rebecca Ziv
Safed, , Israel
Asaf harofeh
Tel Aviv, , Israel
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
RMB-0096-12
Identifier Type: OTHER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
RMB-0096-12
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.