Study of the Safety and Efficacy of Zoenasa® Versus Mesalamine Enema in Subjects With Left-Sided Ulcerative Colitis

NCT ID: NCT01586533

Last Updated: 2014-01-08

Study Results

Results pending

The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

UNKNOWN

Clinical Phase

PHASE2

Total Enrollment

120 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-06-30

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This double-blind, randomized, comparator-controlled Phase II study is designed to establish the safety and efficacy of Zoenasa Rectal Gel compared to mesalamine enema in subjects with left-sided ulcerative colitis, as measured by the modified ulcerative colitis disease activity index (UCDAI), over 6 weeks of treatment. In this study, two cohorts of subjects will receive either Zoenasa-1:4 (1.0g NAC; 4.0g 5-ASA) investigational drug enema therapy or comparator mesalamine enema (4.0g 5-ASA). The study will enroll subjects randomized equally into the 2 cohorts. Each cohort will enroll approximately 60 subjects. The two arms of the trial will be enrolled concurrently in a randomized fashion.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Ulcerative Colitis Left-sided Ulcerative Colitis Distal Ulcerative Colitis

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Zoenasa-1:4

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Zoenasa-1:4

Intervention Type DRUG

Zoenasa Rectal Gel (4.0g mesalamine \[5-ASA\], 1.0g N-acetylcysteine \[NAC\]; 60ml)

Mesalamine Enema

Group Type ACTIVE_COMPARATOR

Mesalamine Enema

Intervention Type DRUG

Mesalamine Rectal Suspension Enema (4.0g mesalamine \[5-ASA\], 60ml)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Zoenasa-1:4

Zoenasa Rectal Gel (4.0g mesalamine \[5-ASA\], 1.0g N-acetylcysteine \[NAC\]; 60ml)

Intervention Type DRUG

Mesalamine Enema

Mesalamine Rectal Suspension Enema (4.0g mesalamine \[5-ASA\], 60ml)

Intervention Type DRUG

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* Male and female subjects are eligible if they are ≥ 18 years of age and ≤ 64 years.
* They have a documented history of idiopathic ulcerative colitis based on endoscopic and/or histologic findings involving the left side of the colon, with mild to moderate active disease.
* Eligible subjects will have a documented history of ulcerative colitis, and a modified UCDAI score of 4-10, inclusive, with a Physician's rating of disease score of 2 points or less (mild or moderate active ulcerative colitis), rectal bleeding score of 1 or more (based on subject diary), and mucosal appearance score (based on endoscopy) of 1 point or more at baseline.
* Laboratory data:

* White blood cell count between 4.0 - 12.0 K/mm3
* Platelet count: 150 - 500 K/mm3
* Hemoglobin \> 10.0 g/dL
* Total bilirubin \< 1.5 mg/dL
* Aspartate aminotransferase \< 100 u/dL
* Alanine aminotransferase \< 100 u/dL
* Alkaline phosphatase \< 250 u/dL
* Blood urine nitrogen \< 40 mg/dL
* Creatinine \< 1.5 mg/dL
* Satisfies one of the following:
* Female subjects of childbearing potential must have a negative urine pregnancy test at screening; surgically sterile, post-menopausal, abstinent, or patient or partner agree to use a medically appropriate form of birth control from screening to until 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
* Male subjects must be surgically sterile, abstinent, or patient or partner compliant with a contraceptive regimen from screening to until 1 month after the last dose of study medication.
* They are able to understand and sign a written informed consent form, which must be obtained prior to initiation of study procedures.

Exclusion Criteria

* They have documented history of proximal or universal ulcerative colitis, proctitis or active proctitis confined to 15cm or less from the anal verge.
* They demonstrate signs and symptoms of fulminant colitis, bowel stricture, toxic megacolon, an anticipated need for blood transfusion for gastrointestinal bleeding, or demonstrate evidence of peritonitis.
* They receive a Physician's rating of disease severity as part of the modified UCDAI of 3 (severe disease) or an aggregate score of 11 or greater.
* They have shown prior documented history of evidence of high grade dysplasia on biopsy from endoscopic examinations.
* Their stool contains enteric pathogens or Clostridium difficile toxins.
* They have a history of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection.
* They have prior history of biologic therapy within the previous 4 years.
* They have received systemic steroids or immunosuppressants within the previous 4 weeks.
* Treatment in the last 14 days that included antibiotic, antifungal, antiparasitic medications, or rectally administered steroids (e.g. Cortenema®) or mesalamine enema (Rowasa®).
* Treatment in the last 7 days that included mesalamine (5-ASA) via oral administration (e.g. Asacol®, Lialda®, balsalazide, etc).
* They have a history of cancer (defined as malignancy within 5 years except for squamous cell or basal cell cancers of the skin), asthma, or bronchospasm.
* Positive pregnancy test or lactating subjects.
* There is evidence of chemical substance abuse.
* They have had repeated anti-inflammatory drug treatment (longer than 3 days at doses that exceed those available without a prescription) within the previous 7 days (with exception of aspirin at doses of 325mg/day or less for prophylaxis of cardiac disease), or initiated new non-steroidal anti-inflammatory (NSAID) treatment within the last 30 days.
* They have a known allergy to N-acetylcysteine or mesalamine, or have a history of serious AEs related to their use (including, but not limited to pancreatitis or hepatitis).
* They have a history of failure to retain enemas.
* Other clinically significant diseases that could interfere with the protocol compliance appear. These would include clinically important hematological, renal, hepatic, metabolic, psychiatric, central nervous system (CNS), pulmonary or cardiovascular disease.
* Use of any investigational medication within the previous 90 days.
* Any condition which the study physician judges to preclude safe participation in the study or to confound the evaluation of the study outcome.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

64 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Altheus Therapeutics, Inc.

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Birmingham Gastroenterology Associates

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Digestive Health Specialists of the Southeast

Dothan, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Rocky Mountain Gastroenterology

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Digestive Disease Associates

Gainesville, Florida, United States

Site Status

Digestive Medical Associates

Hialeah, Florida, United States

Site Status

The Center for Gastrointestinal Disorders

Hollywood, Florida, United States

Site Status

Miami Gastroenterology Consultants P.A.

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

South Medical Research Group

Miami, Florida, United States

Site Status

Gastroenterology of Naples

Naples, Florida, United States

Site Status

Advanced Gastroenterology Associates

Palm Harbor, Florida, United States

Site Status

Shafran Gastroenterology

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Site Status

Tri-County Research

Athens, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Digestive Healthcare of Georgia

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Site Status

The Atlanta Center for Gastroenterology

Decatur, Georgia, United States

Site Status

St. Josephs Candler Health System

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Site Status

NCH Medical Group

Arlington Heights, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Gastrointestinal Clinic of Quad Cities

Davenport, Iowa, United States

Site Status

Professional Research Network of Kansas

Wichita, Kansas, United States

Site Status

Clinical Trials Management of Louisiana

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Site Status

Dr. Jason Bozdin, M.D.

Berkley, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Clinical Research Institute of Michigan, LLC

Chesterfield, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Gregory Cammel, MD PLC

Wyoming, Michigan, United States

Site Status

GI Associates and Endoscopy Center

Jackson, Mississippi, United States

Site Status

Long Island Clinical Research Associates

Great Neck, New York, United States

Site Status

Research Associates of New York

New York, New York, United States

Site Status

Asheville Gastroenterology Associates, P.A.

Asheville, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Carolina Digestive Health Associates

Davidson, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

LeBauer Research Associates, P.A.

Greensboro, North Carolina, United States

Site Status

Greater Cincinnati Gastroenterology

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Central Sooner Research

Norman, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Oklahoma Foundation for Digestive Research

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Options Health Research

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

Gastroenterology United Tulsa

Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States

Site Status

University of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Gastro One

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Memphis Gastroenterology Group

Germantown, Tennessee, United States

Site Status

Dallas VA Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, United States

Site Status

Houston Digestive Disease Clinic

Houston, Texas, United States

Site Status

Digestive Health Associates of Texas

Plano, Texas, United States

Site Status

Advanced Research Institute

South Ogden, Utah, United States

Site Status

New River Valley Research Institute

Christiansburg, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Digestive & Liver Disease Specialists

Norfolk, Virginia, United States

Site Status

Digestive Disease Institute

Seattle, Washington, United States

Site Status

Franciscan Research Center

Tacoma, Washington, United States

Site Status

Wisconsin Center for Advanced Research

Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

ZA-201

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.