Trial Outcomes & Findings for Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Study Of RN6G In Subjects With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration (NCT NCT01577381)
NCT ID: NCT01577381
Last Updated: 2016-03-16
Results Overview
GA is the advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The reduction in GA area of the study eye was based on Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at 30 days post last dose administration (Day 309).
TERMINATED
PHASE2
10 participants
Baseline and Day 309
2016-03-16
Participant Flow
Participant milestones
| Measure |
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
STARTED
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
COMPLETED
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
0
|
|
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
|
2
|
3
|
3
|
2
|
Reasons for withdrawal
| Measure |
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Overall Study
Discontinued
|
2
|
1
|
2
|
2
|
|
Overall Study
Ongoing at Date of Cut-Off
|
0
|
2
|
1
|
0
|
Baseline Characteristics
Efficacy, Safety And Tolerability Study Of RN6G In Subjects With Geographic Atrophy Secondary to Age-related Macular Degeneration
Baseline characteristics by cohort
| Measure |
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
n=2 Participants
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
n=2 Participants
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Total
n=10 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
|
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Age, Continuous
|
71.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 6.2 • n=7 Participants
|
82.5 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 0.7 • n=5 Participants
|
74.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 12.2 • n=5 Participants
|
73.0 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.3 • n=4 Participants
|
74.6 years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 8.6 • n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Female
|
3 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
7 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
|
Sex: Female, Male
Male
|
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
|
1 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
|
2 Participants
n=4 Participants
|
3 Participants
n=21 Participants
|
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 309Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
GA is the advanced form of dry age-related macular degeneration (AMD). The reduction in GA area of the study eye was based on Fundus Autofluorescence (FAF) at 30 days post last dose administration (Day 309).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
PRIMARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline and Day 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
GA is the advanced form of dry AMD. The reduction in GA area in the study eye was based on FAF at end of study (Day 449).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of letters read correctly (ranging from 0 to 100 letters) in the study eye. The lower the number of letters read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
BCVA is measured using an eye chart and is reported as the number of lines read correctly in the study eye. The lower the number of lines read correctly on the eye chart, the worse the vision (or visual acuity).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
LL-BCVA is the measure of visual acuity under low light conditions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
LL-BCVA is the measure of visual acuity under low light conditions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
LL-BCVA is the measure of visual acuity under low light conditions.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson chart at 1 meter. Participants were tested for contrast sensitivity using +0.50 addition over the protocol refraction providing the best-corrected distance VA. Contrast sensitivity was recorded as the log of the faintest triplet for which 2 of the 3 letters were read correctly.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Contrast sensitivity was measured using the Pelli-Robson chart at 1 meter. Subjects were tested for contrast sensitivity using +0.50 addition over the protocol refraction providing the best-corrected distance VA. Contrast sensitivity was recorded as the log of the faintest triplet for which 2 of the 3 letters were read correctly.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Reading speed in the study eye was assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Participants read the chart for 2 minutes and the number of words read correctly per minute was totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicated an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicated a worsening.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Reading speed in the study eye was assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Participants read the chart for 2 minutes and the number of words read correctly per minute was totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicated an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicated a worsening.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Reading speed in the study eye was assessed using modified Bailey-Lovie word charts. Participants read the chart for 2 minutes and the number of words read correctly per minute was totaled. An increase in the number of words read correctly indicated an improvement and a decrease in the number of words read correctly indicated a worsening.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Reading Acuity was measured using the Radner reading charts and expressed in terms of logRAD (logrithmic Reading Acuity Determination).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Reading Acuity was measured using the Radner reading charts and expressed in terms of logRAD.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Reading Acuity was measured using the Radner reading charts and expressed in terms of logRAD.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
The critical print size is the smallest print size at which participants can read with their maximum reading speed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Month 9, Month 12, Month 15, and End of StudyPopulation: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
The critical print size is the smallest print size at which participants can read with their maximum reading speed.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 85 and Day 169Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Laboratory assessments include: hematology (hemoglobin, hematocrit, red blood cell count, platelet count, white blood cell count, total neutrophils, eosinophils, monocytes, basophils, lymphocytes); blood chemistry (blood urea nitrogen, creatinine, glucose, calcium, sodium, potassium, chloride, total bicarbonate, aspartate aminotransferase, alanine aminotransferase, total bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, uric acid albumin, total protein); coagulation assessments.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Screening, Days 28, 57, 85, 113, 141, and 169Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Vital sign assessments include: supine systolic and diastolic blood pressure, pulse rate and body temperature.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 28, 57, 85, 113 and 169Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Clinically significant ECG findings include: corrected QT (QTc) \> 450 msec, QTc \>500 msec, change in QTc between 30 and 60 msec, change in QTc greater than or equal to 60 msec.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Day 57 and Day 169Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
The number of participants with positive ADA was to be summarized for each treatment arm.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 28, 57, 85, 113, 141 and 169Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least 1 dose of study drug.
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to possibility of causal relationship. Seriousness of an AE was assessed under the criteria of serious adverse event (SAE). An SAE was an AE resulting in any of the following outcomes or deemed significant for any other reason: death; initial or prolonged inpatient hospitalization; life-threatening experience (immediate risk of dying); persistent or significant disability/incapacity; congenital anomaly.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
n=2 Participants
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
n=2 Participants
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) According to Seriousness
AE
|
2 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
1 Participants
|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) According to Seriousness
SAE
|
1 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 28, 57, 85, 113, 141 and 169Population: The safety analysis set included all participants who received at least one dose of study product.
An AE was an untoward medical occurrence in a participant who received study drug without regard to causal relationship. An investigator's relationship assessment is the determination of whether there exists a reasonable possibility that the investigational product caused or contributed to an AE.
Outcome measures
| Measure |
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
n=2 Participants
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
n=3 Participants
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
n=2 Participants
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Number of Participants With Treatment-Related TEAEs
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
0 Participants
|
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 28,57, 85, 169, 253, 281, 309, 337, and 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 28,57, 85, 169, 253, 281, 309, 337, and 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 28,57, 85, 169, 253, 281, 309, 337, and 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 28,57, 85, 169, 253, 281, 309, 337, and 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Steady state total body clearance equals infusion rate (zero order) divided by steady state plasma concentration of study drug (R0/Css)
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 28,57, 85, 169, 253, 281, 309, 337, and 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Days 1, 28, 57, 85, 169, 253, 281, 309, 337 and 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Population PK parameters were to be evaluated for Cmax, AUCt, Cmin, CLss, and Rac for AUCt between the first and last (11th) doses.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Concentration of total amino acid peptide, known as A-Beta 1-x, in plasma.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Concentration of amino acid peptide, known as A-Beta 1-40, in plasma.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
SECONDARY outcome
Timeframe: Baseline, Day 449Population: Analysis was not performed due to early study termination. As only 10 participants enrolled at the time of termination, there were not enough subjects or data to perform meaningful analyses (8 were assigned to active drug \[1 was not dosed and there was notable variability on how many doses were received by the other 7\]; 2 were assigned to placebo).
Concentration of amino acid peptide, known as A-Beta 1-42, in plasma.
Outcome measures
Outcome data not reported
Adverse Events
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
Placebo
Serious adverse events
| Measure |
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
n=2 participants at risk
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
n=3 participants at risk
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
n=3 participants at risk
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nervous system disorders
Carotid artery stenosis
|
50.0%
1/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Other adverse events
| Measure |
PF-04382923 2.5 mg/kg
n=2 participants at risk
PF-04382923 (RN6G) at 2.5 milligrams per kilogram (mg/kg) was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 7.5 mg/kg
n=3 participants at risk
PF-04382923 at 7.5 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
PF-04382923 15.0 mg/kg
n=3 participants at risk
PF-04382923 at 15.0 mg/kg was administered as an IV infusion over 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
Placebo
n=2 participants at risk
Placebo was administered as an IV infusion over at least 30 minutes every 28 days for 11 doses.
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Gastrointestinal disorders
Irritable bowel syndrome
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
1/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Influenza
|
50.0%
1/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Upper respiratory tract infection
|
50.0%
1/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Infections and infestations
Urinary tract infection
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
1/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
Tendonitis
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
50.0%
1/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Nervous system disorders
Headache
|
50.0%
1/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
1/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Renal and urinary disorders
Nephropathy
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
33.3%
1/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
|
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
Oropharyngeal pain
|
50.0%
1/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/3
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
0.00%
0/2
The same event may appear as both an AE and a SAE. However, what is presented are distinct events. An event may be categorized as serious in one subject and as non-serious in another subject, or one subject may have experienced both a serious and non-serious event during the study.
|
Additional Information
Results disclosure agreements
- Principal investigator is a sponsor employee Restriction Description: Pfizer has the right to review disclosures, requesting a delay of less than 60 days. Investigator will postpone single center publications until after disclosure of pooled data (all sites), less than 12 months from study completion/termination at all participating sites. Investigator may not disclose previously undisclosed confidential information other than study results.
- Publication restrictions are in place
Restriction type: OTHER