Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab Compared With Risedronate in Individuals Taking Glucocorticoids

NCT ID: NCT01575873

Last Updated: 2018-07-27

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE3

Total Enrollment

795 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-28

Study Completion Date

2017-06-29

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

This is a 2-year study to evaluate the effect of denosumab versus risedronate in adults with glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Steroid-induced Osteopor, Glucocorticoid-induced Ostepor

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

PARALLEL

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

TRIPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Denosumab

Participants received 60 mg denosumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1 and at months 6, 12, and 18. Participants also received placebo to risedronate orally once a day for 24 months.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 6 months

Placebo for risendronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered orally once a day

Risendronate

Participants received 5 mg risedronate orally once a day for 24 months and placebo to densumab by subcutaneous injection on day 1 and at months 6, 12, and 18.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Risendronate

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered orally once a day

Placebo for denosumab

Intervention Type DRUG

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 6 months

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Denosumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 6 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for risendronate

Administered orally once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Risendronate

Administered orally once a day

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo for denosumab

Administered by subcutaneous injection once every 6 months

Intervention Type DRUG

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

Prolia® Actonel, Atelvia

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

Men and women 18 years of age or older who have been taking glucocorticoid treatment. Men and women who are less than 50 years of age must have had a fracture as an adult to be eligible. Men and women who are 50 years of age or older who have been taking glucocorticoids must meet protocol-specific BMD criteria.

Exclusion Criteria

Use of agents affecting bone metabolism, use of more than one biologic agent for inflammatory disease, history of bone disease (except osteoporosis), low vitamin D level (one can enter the trial after vitamin D levels are corrected), abnormalities of blood calcium, an underactive or overactive thyroid condition that is not treated and stable, Addison's disease, any abnormality of the parathyroid glands (the glands that control blood calcium), currently pregnant or planning a pregnancy, currently breast feeding, and other criteria may apply.
Minimum Eligible Age

18 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

Amgen

INDUSTRY

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Responsibility Role SPONSOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

MD

Role: STUDY_DIRECTOR

Amgen

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Research Site

Birmingham, Alabama, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Sacramento, California, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Lakewood, Colorado, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Gainesville, Georgia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Chicago, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Evanston, Illinois, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Indianapolis, Indiana, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Bethesda, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Cumberland, Maryland, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Boston, Massachusetts, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Detroit, Michigan, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Fargo, North Dakota, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Mayfield, Ohio, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Duncansville, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Beckley, West Virginia, United States

Site Status

Research Site

Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Ciudad Autonoma de Buenos Aires, Buenos Aires, Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Buenos Aires, , Argentina

Site Status

Research Site

Brussels, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Genk, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Ghent, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Liège, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Wilrijk, , Belgium

Site Status

Research Site

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Barrie, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Hamilton, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Waterloo, Ontario, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Montreal, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Québec, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Trois-Rivières, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Westmout, Quebec, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Saskatoon, Saskatchewan, Canada

Site Status

Research Site

Barranquilla, Atlántico, Colombia

Site Status

Research Site

Brno, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pardubice, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Pilsen, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Prague, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Praha 11 - Chodov, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Uherské Hradiště, , Czechia

Site Status

Research Site

Aalborg, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Århus C, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Ballerup Municipality, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Vejle, , Denmark

Site Status

Research Site

Lyon Cédex 3, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Orléans, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Vandœuvre-lès-Nancy, , France

Site Status

Research Site

Bad Nauheim, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Bad Reichenhall, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Berlin, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Cologne, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Hildesheim, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Vogelsang-Gommern, , Germany

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Budapest, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Debrecen, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Gyula, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szeged, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

Szikszó, , Hungary

Site Status

Research Site

León, Guanajuato, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Mexico City, Mexico City, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Morelia, Michoacán, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

San Luis Potosí City, San Luis Potosí, Mexico

Site Status

Research Site

Amsterdam, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Helmond, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Utrecht, , Netherlands

Site Status

Research Site

Bialystok, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Krakow, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Lodz, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Poznan, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Stalowa Wola, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Torun, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Warsaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Wroclaw, , Poland

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Moscow, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Nizhny Novgorod, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Saint Petersburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yaroslavl, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Yekaterinburg, , Russia

Site Status

Research Site

Daegu, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Daejeon, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Gwangju, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Jinju, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Seoul, , South Korea

Site Status

Research Site

Barcelona, Catalonia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Valencia, Valencia, Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Research Site

Madrid, , Spain

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

United States Argentina Belgium Canada Colombia Czechia Denmark France Germany Hungary Mexico Netherlands Poland Russia South Korea Spain

References

Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.

Saag KG, Wagman RB, Geusens P, Adachi JD, Messina OD, Emkey R, Chapurlat R, Wang A, Pannacciulli N, Lems WF. Denosumab versus risedronate in glucocorticoid-induced osteoporosis: a multicentre, randomised, double-blind, active-controlled, double-dummy, non-inferiority study. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2018 Jun;6(6):445-454. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(18)30075-5. Epub 2018 Apr 6.

Reference Type BACKGROUND
PMID: 29631782 (View on PubMed)

Saag KG, Pannacciulli N, Geusens P, Adachi JD, Messina OD, Morales-Torres J, Emkey R, Butler PW, Yin X, Lems WF. Denosumab Versus Risedronate in Glucocorticoid-Induced Osteoporosis: Final Results of a Twenty-Four-Month Randomized, Double-Blind, Double-Dummy Trial. Arthritis Rheumatol. 2019 Jul;71(7):1174-1184. doi: 10.1002/art.40874. Epub 2019 May 25.

Reference Type DERIVED
PMID: 30816640 (View on PubMed)

Related Links

Access external resources that provide additional context or updates about the study.

http://www.amgentrials.com

AmgenTrials clinical trials website

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2010-024393-19

Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER

Identifier Source: secondary_id

20101217

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.