Trial Outcomes & Findings for A Study of the Experimental Drug BKM120 With Paclitaxel in Patients With HER2 Negative, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer, With or Without PI3K Activation (NCT NCT01572727)

NCT ID: NCT01572727

Last Updated: 2017-03-09

Results Overview

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the event, defined as the first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Recruitment status

COMPLETED

Study phase

PHASE2/PHASE3

Target enrollment

416 participants

Primary outcome timeframe

Every 8 weeks from randomization until disease progression up to 10 months after futility was analyzed

Results posted on

2017-03-09

Participant Flow

416 patients randomized patients, 405 received the study treatment \& 403 had at least 1 post-baseline safety assessment. Randomization of patients was stopped following DMC decision \& all but 5 still benefiting from the treatment were discontinued. The DMC decision was based on pre-defined futility criteria at time of the adaptive interim analysis.

A total of approximately 524 patients were to be randomized in a 1:1 ratio to one of the two treatment arms irrespective of the adaptation decision to continue in the full or PI3K pathway activated subpopulation. Randomization was stratified by PI3K activation and Hormone Receptor status.

Participant milestones

Participant milestones
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Overall Study
STARTED
207
209
Overall Study
Pts With Treatment + Safety Assessment
202
201
Overall Study
COMPLETED
0
0
Overall Study
NOT COMPLETED
207
209

Reasons for withdrawal

Reasons for withdrawal
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Overall Study
Adverse Event
43
15
Overall Study
Lost to Follow-up
1
1
Overall Study
Physician Decision
23
9
Overall Study
Progressive disease
59
82
Overall Study
Protocol Violation
0
1
Overall Study
Study terminated by sponsor
61
83
Overall Study
Parent/guardian decision
14
9
Overall Study
Death
2
2
Overall Study
Untreated
4
7

Baseline Characteristics

A Study of the Experimental Drug BKM120 With Paclitaxel in Patients With HER2 Negative, Locally Advanced or Metastatic Breast Cancer, With or Without PI3K Activation

Baseline characteristics by cohort

Baseline characteristics by cohort
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
n=207 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
n=209 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Total
n=416 Participants
Total of all reporting groups
Age, Continuous
54.1 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 11.13 • n=5 Participants
55.6 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.48 • n=7 Participants
54.9 Years
STANDARD_DEVIATION 10.89 • n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Female
207 Participants
n=5 Participants
209 Participants
n=7 Participants
416 Participants
n=5 Participants
Sex: Female, Male
Male
0 Participants
n=5 Participants
0 Participants
n=7 Participants
0 Participants
n=5 Participants

PRIMARY outcome

Timeframe: Every 8 weeks from randomization until disease progression up to 10 months after futility was analyzed

Population: FAS per Expert Report: All pts randomized to study treatment. Per ITT principle, pts were analyzed according to treatment \& strata. FAS was primary population for analysis of efficacy endpoints at interim. 338 pts were randomized (between 16-Aug-2012 \& 07-Jun-2014) in 1:1 ratio to buparlisib + paclitaxel arm N=168 or placebo + paclitaxel arm N=170.

PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the event, defined as the first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to any cause. Progression was defined using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1), as a 20% increase in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions, or a measurable increase in a non-target lesion, or the appearance of new lesions.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
n=168 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
n=170 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Progression-free Survival (PFS)Assessed by Local Investigator's Assessment (Phase ll)
8.0 Months
Interval 7.2 to 9.2
9.2 Months
Interval 7.3 to 11.0

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: every 3 months until death, lost to follow-up, or withdrawal of consent to survival follow-up, up to 10 months after futility was analyzed

Population: Full analysis set (FAS) comprises all patients who were randomized to study treatment.

Overall survival (OS) was defined as the time from date of randomization to date of death due to any cause. If a patient was not known to have died by the date of analysis cut-off, OS was censored at the date of last contact.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
n=207 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
n=209 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Overall Survival by Kaplan-Meier Estimate (Phase ll)
29.5 Months
Interval 25.0 to 30.0
NA Months
N/A = Given the fact that patients were discontinued after the interim analysis the number of participants with events was too low to analyze.

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: every 8 weeks after randomization Up to 3 months after end of Treatment

Population: FAS per Expert Report: All pts randomized to study treatment. Per ITT principle, pts were analyzed according to treatment \& strata. FAS was primary population for analysis of efficacy endpoints at interim. 338 pts were randomized (between 16-Aug-2012 \& 07-Jun-2014) in 1:1 ratio to buparlisib + paclitaxel arm N=168 or placebo + paclitaxel arm N=170.

Percentage of patients with best overall response of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) based on local investigator's assessment according to RECIST v1.1. According to this criteria, CR = at least two determinations of CR at least 4 weeks apart before progression; PR = at least two determinations of PR or better at least 4 weeks apart before progression (and not qualifying for a CR). Per Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (RECIST v1.1) for target lesions and assessed by MRI: Complete Response (CR), Disappearance of all target lesions; Partial Response (PR), \>=30% decrease in the sum of the longest diameter of target lesions; Overall Response (OR) = CR + PR.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
n=168 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
n=170 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Overall Response Rate (Phase ll)
22.6 Percentage of participants
Interval 16.5 to 29.7
27.1 Percentage of participants
Interval 20.5 to 34.4

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: every 8 weeks after randomization Up to 3 months after end of Treatment

Population: PFS, ORR and CBR were analyzed and reported at the interim analysis. Given the study met the futility analysis per protocol, the duration of response was removed as a secondary endpoint in the final analysis and consequently not analyzed.

time from the date of the first documented response (CR or PR, which had to be confirmed subsequently) to the date of the first radiologically documented disease progression or death due to disease

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: every 8 weeks after randomization Up to 3 months after end of Treatment

Population: PFS, ORR and CBR were analyzed and reported at the interim analysis. Given the study met the futility analysis per protocol, time to response was removed as a secondary endpoint in the final analysis and consequently not analyzed.

time from date of randomization until first documented response (CR or PR, which has to be confirmed subsequently).

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: every 8 weeks after randomization Up to 3 months after end of Treatment

Population: FAS per Expert Report: All pts randomized to study treatment. Per ITT principle, pts were analyzed according to treatment \& strata. FAS was primary population for analysis of efficacy endpoints at interim. 338 pts were randomized (between 16-Aug-2012 \& 07-Jun-2014) in 1:1 ratio to buparlisib + paclitaxel arm N=168 or placebo + paclitaxel arm N=170.

CBR was defined as the percentage of patients with an overall response of CR or PR or SD or non-CR/non-PD lasting more than 24 weeks based on local Investigator's assessment according to RECIST v1.1.

Outcome measures

Outcome measures
Measure
BKM120 and Paclitaxel
n=168 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo and Paclitaxel
n=170 Participants
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Clinical Benefit Rate (CBR) (Phase ll)
26.2 Percentage of participants
Interval 19.7 to 33.5
32.9 Percentage of participants
Interval 25.9 to 40.6

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: Cycle 1 day 1, 15, 16, 22 and Cycle 2 day 1.

Population: PFS, ORR and CBR were analyzed and reported at the interim analysis. Given the study met the futility analysis per protocol, the plasma concentration-time profiles was removed as a secondary endpoint in the final analysis and consequently not analyzed.

Summary statistics for PK: plasma concentration-time profiles of BKM120 and appropriate individual PK parameters based on population PK model , if deemed appropriate; each cycle = 28 days

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

SECONDARY outcome

Timeframe: every 4 weeks

Population: PFS, ORR and CBR were analyzed and reported at the interim analysis. Given the study met the futility analysis per protocol, the time to definitive deterioration of ECOG performance status was removed as a secondary endpoint in the final analysis and consequently not analyzed.

Time to definitive deterioration of the ECOG performance status from baseline

Outcome measures

Outcome data not reported

Adverse Events

Buparlisib (BKM120) 100 mg Plus Paclitaxel 80 mg Per m2

Serious events: 61 serious events
Other events: 196 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Placebo 100 mg Plus Paclitaxel 80 mg Per m2

Serious events: 42 serious events
Other events: 188 other events
Deaths: 0 deaths

Serious adverse events

Serious adverse events
Measure
Buparlisib (BKM120) 100 mg Plus Paclitaxel 80 mg Per m2
n=202 participants at risk
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo 100 mg Plus Paclitaxel 80 mg Per m2
n=201 participants at risk
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
FEBRILE NEUTROPENIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
LEUKOPENIA
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
NEUTROPENIA
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIAC FAILURE CONGESTIVE
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
CARDIO-RESPIRATORY ARREST
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Cardiac disorders
PERICARDIAL EFFUSION
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Eye disorders
CATARACT
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Eye disorders
OPTIC NEUROPATHY
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
2.5%
5/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.5%
3/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
PANCREATITIS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
ASTHENIA
1.5%
3/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
FACE OEDEMA
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
GENERAL PHYSICAL HEALTH DETERIORATION
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.5%
3/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
LOCALISED OEDEMA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
MALAISE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
PYREXIA
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.5%
3/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Hepatobiliary disorders
CHOLECYSTITIS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
ANAPHYLACTIC REACTION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Immune system disorders
HYPERSENSITIVITY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
ABSCESS LIMB
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
CELLULITIS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
2.5%
5/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
DEVICE RELATED INFECTION
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.00%
2/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
GASTROENTERITIS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
GASTROINTESTINAL INFECTION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
HERPES ZOSTER
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
INFLUENZA
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
INFUSION SITE INFECTION
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
MENINGITIS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMOCYSTIS JIROVECII INFECTION
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
PNEUMONIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
PYELONEPHRITIS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
SEPSIS
1.5%
3/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
STAPHYLOCOCCAL BACTERAEMIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
2.0%
4/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FALL
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
FEMUR FRACTURE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
HEAD INJURY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
POST-TRAUMATIC PAIN
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
SPINAL FRACTURE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
TOXICITY TO VARIOUS AGENTS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Injury, poisoning and procedural complications
ULNA FRACTURE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
EJECTION FRACTION DECREASED
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
LYMPHOCYTE COUNT INCREASED
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DEHYDRATION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.5%
3/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOCALCAEMIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOGLYCAEMIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPONATRAEMIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BONE PAIN
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.00%
2/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULAR WEAKNESS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN EXTREMITY
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PATHOLOGICAL FRACTURE
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
CANCER PAIN
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Neoplasms benign, malignant and unspecified (incl cysts and polyps)
METASTASES TO CENTRAL NERVOUS SYSTEM
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
ALTERED STATE OF CONSCIOUSNESS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
BRACHIAL PLEXOPATHY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
BRAIN COMPRESSION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
BRAIN OEDEMA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
CEREBRAL HAEMORRHAGE
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
ENCEPHALOPATHY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
HEMIPARESIS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
METABOLIC ENCEPHALOPATHY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
PARAESTHESIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
SEIZURE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
SPINAL CORD COMPRESSION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
SYNCOPE
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.00%
2/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
ACUTE PSYCHOSIS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
ANXIETY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
CONFUSIONAL STATE
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
DELIRIUM
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
MENTAL DISORDER
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
MENTAL STATUS CHANGES
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
PSYCHOTIC DISORDER
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
ACUTE KIDNEY INJURY
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
NEPHROLITHIASIS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Renal and urinary disorders
RENAL FAILURE
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
BREAST HAEMORRHAGE
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Reproductive system and breast disorders
BREAST ULCERATION
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
ASTHMA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
1.00%
2/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA EXERTIONAL
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
HYPOXIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
INTERSTITIAL LUNG DISEASE
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMONITIS
3.0%
6/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PNEUMOTHORAX
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
PULMONARY EMBOLISM
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH MACULAR
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH MACULO-PAPULAR
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH PRURITIC
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN MASS
0.00%
0/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SKIN ULCER
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
SWELLING FACE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
TOXIC SKIN ERUPTION
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
URTICARIA
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Social circumstances
DIET NONCOMPLIANCE
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
DEEP VEIN THROMBOSIS
1.5%
3/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
HYPERTENSION
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
VENA CAVA THROMBOSIS
0.50%
1/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.00%
0/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
VENOUS THROMBOSIS
0.99%
2/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
0.50%
1/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Other adverse events

Other adverse events
Measure
Buparlisib (BKM120) 100 mg Plus Paclitaxel 80 mg Per m2
n=202 participants at risk
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received study drug plus paclitaxel
Placebo 100 mg Plus Paclitaxel 80 mg Per m2
n=201 participants at risk
Adult females with histologically confirmed, inoperable, locally advanced or metastatic HER2- BC who received placebo plus paclitaxel
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
ANAEMIA
22.8%
46/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
25.4%
51/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Blood and lymphatic system disorders
NEUTROPENIA
31.7%
64/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
26.9%
54/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Eye disorders
LACRIMATION INCREASED
5.9%
12/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
8.5%
17/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Eye disorders
VISION BLURRED
9.4%
19/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
3.5%
7/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN
13.4%
27/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
10.9%
22/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
ABDOMINAL PAIN UPPER
5.4%
11/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.0%
14/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
CONSTIPATION
23.3%
47/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
18.9%
38/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DIARRHOEA
54.0%
109/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
33.8%
68/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DRY MOUTH
5.9%
12/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.0%
10/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
DYSPEPSIA
11.4%
23/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.5%
15/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
NAUSEA
41.1%
83/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
25.4%
51/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
STOMATITIS
27.7%
56/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
11.9%
24/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Gastrointestinal disorders
VOMITING
19.3%
39/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
14.9%
30/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
ASTHENIA
23.8%
48/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
22.4%
45/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
FATIGUE
33.2%
67/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
31.8%
64/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
NON-CARDIAC CHEST PAIN
2.0%
4/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.5%
11/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
OEDEMA PERIPHERAL
10.4%
21/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
24.9%
50/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
PAIN
4.5%
9/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.5%
11/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
General disorders
PYREXIA
14.4%
29/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
9.5%
19/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
RHINITIS
5.4%
11/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
4.5%
9/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
UPPER RESPIRATORY TRACT INFECTION
5.4%
11/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
11.4%
23/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Infections and infestations
URINARY TRACT INFECTION
8.9%
18/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
9.0%
18/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
ALANINE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
17.3%
35/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.0%
12/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
ASPARTATE AMINOTRANSFERASE INCREASED
14.9%
30/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.5%
11/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
BLOOD GLUCOSE INCREASED
6.4%
13/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.0%
10/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
GAMMA-GLUTAMYLTRANSFERASE INCREASED
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.0%
12/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
NEUTROPHIL COUNT DECREASED
7.4%
15/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.5%
15/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
WEIGHT DECREASED
14.9%
30/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.0%
14/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Investigations
WHITE BLOOD CELL COUNT DECREASED
5.0%
10/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.0%
14/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
DECREASED APPETITE
31.7%
64/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
12.9%
26/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPERGLYCAEMIA
40.6%
82/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
10.9%
22/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Metabolism and nutrition disorders
HYPOKALAEMIA
9.4%
19/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
3.0%
6/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
ARTHRALGIA
11.4%
23/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
15.9%
32/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BACK PAIN
10.4%
21/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
10.9%
22/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
BONE PAIN
5.0%
10/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.0%
14/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MUSCULOSKELETAL PAIN
4.0%
8/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.0%
12/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
MYALGIA
10.9%
22/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.4%
27/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Musculoskeletal and connective tissue disorders
PAIN IN EXTREMITY
13.4%
27/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
19.9%
40/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
DIZZINESS
16.3%
33/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
10.4%
21/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
DYSGEUSIA
19.3%
39/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
16.9%
34/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
HEADACHE
17.3%
35/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
18.4%
37/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
NEUROPATHY PERIPHERAL
24.8%
50/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
23.9%
48/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
PARAESTHESIA
12.4%
25/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
16.9%
34/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Nervous system disorders
PERIPHERAL SENSORY NEUROPATHY
15.3%
31/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
15.4%
31/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
ANXIETY
20.3%
41/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
15.4%
31/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
DEPRESSION
24.8%
50/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
8.5%
17/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
INSOMNIA
15.3%
31/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
16.4%
33/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Psychiatric disorders
MOOD ALTERED
5.4%
11/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
2.5%
5/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
COUGH
19.8%
40/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
13.9%
28/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
DYSPNOEA
12.9%
26/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
10.4%
21/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
EPISTAXIS
14.4%
29/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
16.4%
33/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Respiratory, thoracic and mediastinal disorders
OROPHARYNGEAL PAIN
5.9%
12/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
8.0%
16/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ALOPECIA
51.0%
103/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
51.7%
104/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
DRY SKIN
13.9%
28/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
6.5%
13/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ERYTHEMA
5.4%
11/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
8.5%
17/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
NAIL DISCOLOURATION
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
7.0%
14/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
NAIL DISORDER
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
9.5%
19/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
ONYCHOMADESIS
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.5%
11/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
PRURITUS
15.8%
32/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
14.9%
30/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH
42.6%
86/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
21.4%
43/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders
RASH MACULO-PAPULAR
5.9%
12/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
4.0%
8/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
FLUSHING
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.5%
11/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
HYPERTENSION
8.4%
17/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
5.0%
10/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
Vascular disorders
LYMPHOEDEMA
3.5%
7/202
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.
8.0%
16/201
Among 416 randomized patients, 405 patients received the study treatment. Of them, 403 patients had at least one post-baseline safety assessment.

Additional Information

Study Director

Novartis Pharmaceuticals

Phone: 862-778-8300

Results disclosure agreements

  • Principal investigator is a sponsor employee The terms and conditions of Novartis' agreements with its investigators may vary. However, Novartis does not prohibit any investigator from publishing. Any publications from a single-site are postponed until the publication of pooled data (i.e.,data from all sites) in clinical trial or disclosure of trial results in their entirety.
  • Publication restrictions are in place

Restriction type: OTHER