Deep Brain Stimulation of Nucleus Accumbens for Chronic and Resistant Major Depressive Disorder
NCT ID: NCT01569711
Last Updated: 2015-05-27
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
6 participants
OBSERVATIONAL
2009-02-28
2013-05-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
DBS in Treatment Resistant Major Depression
NCT01268137
Deep Brain Stimulation in Patients With Chronic Treatment Resistant Depression
NCT01973478
Deep Brain Stimulation in Treatment Resistant Depression
NCT01435148
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment-Refractory Major Depression
NCT00122031
Deep Brain Stimulation for Treatment Resistant Depression
NCT05716555
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Among patients with a chronic course of the disease, 20 to 30% are resistant to antidepressant medications. Among those patients not responding favorably to antidepressant medications, 50% would not benefit from ECT. For such patients, surgical interventions have been proposed in the past.
Many results support the hypothesis of a dysfunction of the functional loops between cortical and subcortical structures underlying the expression of depressive disorders.
Thus, therapeutic intervention focusing on these loops, in patients with chronic depression resistant to treatment, should be an issue and could improve prognosis of these patients.
As part of a maximal resistance to antidepressant drug, after failure of a series of bilateral ECT, a surgical functional intervention using DBS of nucleus accumbens is considered.
This open-label trial proposes to assess feasibility, safety and efficacy of DBS of nucleus accumbens in patients with chronic depression.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
PROSPECTIVE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Deep brain stimulation
Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens
* Day0 : surgical placement of electrodes
* M1 : stimulation of nucleus accumbens
* M5 : stimulation of nucleus accumbens or associative territory of caudate nucleus (if no response observed with nucleus accumbens stimulation)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Deep brain stimulation of nucleus accumbens
* Day0 : surgical placement of electrodes
* M1 : stimulation of nucleus accumbens
* M5 : stimulation of nucleus accumbens or associative territory of caudate nucleus (if no response observed with nucleus accumbens stimulation)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Meeting DSM-IV-TR for a major depressive disorder (MDD), recurrent (296.3x) diagnosed using the MINI scale
* Duration of the episode \> 2 years
* History of recurrent MDD (at least one prior episode index), authenticated by a report of ambulatory care or hospitalization
* Meeting Thase and Rush stage V for resistance (Thase and Rush 1997) (Annex 1 : mettre l'annexe)
* Presenting simultaneously an HDRS total score (17 items)\> 21, a GAF \<50, and a score of 4 on CGI despite the use of all the following strategies :
* monotherapy: 2 SSRIs, 1 ISRNA, 1 tricyclic (with measurement of plasma) at the maximum prescribed for a period of 8 weeks
* association at least one previous antidepressant, and for at least six weeks of one of the following treatment: lithium, thyroid hormone, buspirone, pindolol. An intolerance to one of these drug treatments related to its known side effects will be considered equivalent to the lack of effect of this treatment
* irreversible MAOI: iproniazid (Marsilid \*)
* combination of 2 antipsychotics, with at least a second generation antipsychotic (olanzapine, risperidone, amisulpride, aripiprazole or clozapine)
* combination of 2 antidepressants
* ECT: at least 8 sessions in maximal load with crisis GET\> 25 sec bilaterally. If not possible by cognitive impairment: unilateral
* structured psychotherapy inspired cognitive-behavioral or other type of structured psychotherapy for a period of one year
* Understanding of the study
* Giving their written, free and informed consent
* Affiliated to social security
Exclusion Criteria
* Cognitive deterioration (Mattis \< 130)
* Abnormal brain standard MRI or contraindication for MRI
* Axis 1 disorder other than MDD (except generalized anxiety disorder, social phobia, panic disorder)
* Addiction to alcohol and other psychoactive substances with the exception of nicotine
* suicide risk in the last month (MINI 5.0.0: section suicide risk DIGS: section intent, premeditation, lethality) and score\> 2 in item 3 of HDRS
* More than two suicide attempts within two years prior to inclusion
* MDD with psychotic features congruent or incongruent to the mood or an history of MDD with psychotic features
* Diagnostic criteria for personality disorders according to DSM-IV-TR Cluster A or B evaluated using the SCID2 (Maffei et al., 1997)
* Involuntary commitment, guardianship or trusteeship
* Women of childbearing without effective contraception
30 Years
60 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Rennes University Hospital
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Millet MD Bruno
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Rennes University Hospital
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Grenoble University Hospital (Nord Hospital)
Grenoble, France, France
Bordeaux UH
Bordeaux, , France
Gabriel montpied University Hospital
Clermont-Ferrand, , France
Lille UH (Roger Salengro Hospital)
Lille, , France
Lyon UH (Pierre Wertheimer Hospital)
Lyon, , France
La Salpétrière UH
Paris, , France
Sainte Anne UH
Paris, , France
Poitiers UH
Poitiers, , France
Rennes UH
Rennes, , France
Toulouse UH
Toulouse, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Millet B, Jaafari N, Polosan M, Baup N, Giordana B, Haegelen C, Chabardes S, Fontaine D, Devaux B, Yelnik J, Fossati P, Aouizerate B, Krebs MO, Robert G, Jay T, Cornu P, Verin M, Drapier S, Drapier D, Sauleau P, Peron J, Le Jeune F, Naudet F, Reymann JM. Limbic versus cognitive target for deep brain stimulation in treatment-resistant depression: accumbens more promising than caudate. Eur Neuropsychopharmacol. 2014 Aug;24(8):1229-39. doi: 10.1016/j.euroneuro.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 May 20.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-A00234-51
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.