Bowel Care and Cardiovascular Function After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT ID: NCT01567605
Last Updated: 2023-02-08
Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE4
13 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-03-31
2018-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
The use of a lubricant gel containing an anesthetic is the standard of care in many hospital facilities when performing bowel care for individuals with spinal cord injury; however, it is not often used in the home setting. It is thought that using anaesthetic might reduce the cardiovascular effects of bowel care after spinal cord injury. However, it is not known whether this is the case.
The investigators hypothesize that the lidocaine lubricant will alleviate some of the blood pressure and heart rate changes that occur during bowel care.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Cardiopulmonary Changes Following Spinal Cord Stimulation in Individuals With Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06379711
Improving Bowel Function and Quality of Life After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03949660
Acute Cardiac Responses to Spinal Cord Injury
NCT03143179
Use of Point-of-care Neuro-sacral Electrophysiology Following Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06333886
Non-invasive Spinal Cord Stimulation for Recovery of Autonomic Function After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05369520
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
In people with spinal cord injury, episodes of high blood pressure are common during strong sensory stimuli such as those present during routine bowel care. These episodes of high blood pressure can be dangerous due to the magnitude of blood pressure increase and because they can be accompanied by irregular heart beats. This condition, known as autonomic dysreflexia, is most common in individuals with high-level injuries.
The experience of autonomic dysreflexia can vary widely between individuals: some have goosebumps, sweating, facial flushing or headaches, while others have no symptoms at all, despite their changes in heart rate and blood pressure.
The use of a lubricant gel containing an anesthetic, lidocaine lubricant, is the standard of care in many hospital facilities when performing bowel care for individuals with spinal cord injury; however, it is not often used in the home setting. It is thought that using anaesthetic might reduce the cardiovascular effects of bowel care after spinal cord injury. However, it is not known whether this is the case. We do not yet know the long-term consequences of these short-term elevations in blood pressure during autonomic dysreflexia, but given that they are often associated with discomfort, and have been known to be associated with more severe events such as stroke, it would be beneficial to reduce their occurrence.
Therefore, we will test whether lidocaine lubricant compared to a placebo lubricant improves the symptoms and signs of autonomic dysreflexia during bowel care in people with spinal cord injury.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
QUADRUPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Lidocaine lubricant (then placebo)
In this arm, on the first test day subjects will use lidocaine lubricant in their normal bowel care routine (rather than standard lubricating jelly). After a washout period they will repeat testing with the placebo lubricant.
Lidocaine lubricant
Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of Lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (2%)
Placebo lubricant
Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of placebo lubricant (no topical anesthetic)
Placebo lubricant (then lidocaine)
In this arm, on the first test day subjects will use regular lubricant (AMG MedPro lubricating gel) in their normal bowel care routine. After a washout period they will repeat testing with a the lidocaine lubricant.
Lidocaine lubricant
Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of Lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (2%)
Placebo lubricant
Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of placebo lubricant (no topical anesthetic)
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Lidocaine lubricant
Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of Lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (2%)
Placebo lubricant
Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of placebo lubricant (no topical anesthetic)
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* regular bowel care routine (at least four weeks)
Exclusion Criteria
* currently use ventilator
* colostomy, or do not perform regular bowel care for any reason
* any skin breakdown (pressure sores)
* do not speak English
* are under 19 years old
* are pregnant or think you might be pregnant
* medical/psychiatric condition or substance abuse that is likely to affect your ability to complete this study
* currently using medications containing lidocaine
* allergy to lidocaine
19 Years
80 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
University of British Columbia
OTHER
Simon Fraser University
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Dr. Victoria Claydon
Assistant Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Victoria E Claydon, PhD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Simon Fraser University and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD)
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Simon Fraser University
Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada
International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Provided Documents
Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.
Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2011s0593
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.