Bowel Care and Cardiovascular Function After Spinal Cord Injury

NCT ID: NCT01567605

Last Updated: 2023-02-08

Study Results

Results available

Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.

View full results

Basic Information

Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.

Recruitment Status

COMPLETED

Clinical Phase

PHASE4

Total Enrollment

13 participants

Study Classification

INTERVENTIONAL

Study Start Date

2012-03-31

Study Completion Date

2018-12-31

Brief Summary

Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.

The main goal of this project is to determine the effects of lidocaine lubricant on cardiovascular function during routine bowel care in individuals with spinal cord injury. Bowel care is a common trigger of blood pressure and heart rate changes after spinal cord injury. In this project, we will be measuring blood pressure and heart rate non-invasively during normal bowel routine (which can be performed in the subject's home or at one of the investigators facilities). The measurements will occur twice over a period of 28 days: once using lidocaine lubricant and once using normal (placebo) lubricant. The recording equipment will be attached and subjects will have complete privacy during their bowel routine. The trial will be double-blind, meaning that neither the subject or the Nurse Continence Advisor who assists with testing will know which lubricant is being used for each test.

The use of a lubricant gel containing an anesthetic is the standard of care in many hospital facilities when performing bowel care for individuals with spinal cord injury; however, it is not often used in the home setting. It is thought that using anaesthetic might reduce the cardiovascular effects of bowel care after spinal cord injury. However, it is not known whether this is the case.

The investigators hypothesize that the lidocaine lubricant will alleviate some of the blood pressure and heart rate changes that occur during bowel care.

Detailed Description

Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.

The primary purpose of this study is to investigate the effects of topical anesthesia on cardiovascular changes triggered by bowel care in people with spinal cord injury.

In people with spinal cord injury, episodes of high blood pressure are common during strong sensory stimuli such as those present during routine bowel care. These episodes of high blood pressure can be dangerous due to the magnitude of blood pressure increase and because they can be accompanied by irregular heart beats. This condition, known as autonomic dysreflexia, is most common in individuals with high-level injuries.

The experience of autonomic dysreflexia can vary widely between individuals: some have goosebumps, sweating, facial flushing or headaches, while others have no symptoms at all, despite their changes in heart rate and blood pressure.

The use of a lubricant gel containing an anesthetic, lidocaine lubricant, is the standard of care in many hospital facilities when performing bowel care for individuals with spinal cord injury; however, it is not often used in the home setting. It is thought that using anaesthetic might reduce the cardiovascular effects of bowel care after spinal cord injury. However, it is not known whether this is the case. We do not yet know the long-term consequences of these short-term elevations in blood pressure during autonomic dysreflexia, but given that they are often associated with discomfort, and have been known to be associated with more severe events such as stroke, it would be beneficial to reduce their occurrence.

Therefore, we will test whether lidocaine lubricant compared to a placebo lubricant improves the symptoms and signs of autonomic dysreflexia during bowel care in people with spinal cord injury.

Conditions

See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.

Spinal Cord Injury

Study Design

Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.

Allocation Method

RANDOMIZED

Intervention Model

CROSSOVER

Primary Study Purpose

TREATMENT

Blinding Strategy

QUADRUPLE

Participants Caregivers Investigators Outcome Assessors

Study Groups

Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.

Lidocaine lubricant (then placebo)

In this arm, on the first test day subjects will use lidocaine lubricant in their normal bowel care routine (rather than standard lubricating jelly). After a washout period they will repeat testing with the placebo lubricant.

Group Type EXPERIMENTAL

Lidocaine lubricant

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of Lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (2%)

Placebo lubricant

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of placebo lubricant (no topical anesthetic)

Placebo lubricant (then lidocaine)

In this arm, on the first test day subjects will use regular lubricant (AMG MedPro lubricating gel) in their normal bowel care routine. After a washout period they will repeat testing with a the lidocaine lubricant.

Group Type PLACEBO_COMPARATOR

Lidocaine lubricant

Intervention Type DRUG

Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of Lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (2%)

Placebo lubricant

Intervention Type OTHER

Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of placebo lubricant (no topical anesthetic)

Interventions

Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.

Lidocaine lubricant

Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of Lidocaine hydrochloride jelly (2%)

Intervention Type DRUG

Placebo lubricant

Subjects using this intervention will receive 30 mL of placebo lubricant (no topical anesthetic)

Intervention Type OTHER

Other Intervention Names

Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.

xylocaine jelly (2%) AstraZeneca AMG MedPro lubricating Gel

Eligibility Criteria

Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.

Inclusion Criteria

* traumatic spinal cord injury at least one year ago
* regular bowel care routine (at least four weeks)

Exclusion Criteria

* cauda equina or conus lesion
* currently use ventilator
* colostomy, or do not perform regular bowel care for any reason
* any skin breakdown (pressure sores)
* do not speak English
* are under 19 years old
* are pregnant or think you might be pregnant
* medical/psychiatric condition or substance abuse that is likely to affect your ability to complete this study
* currently using medications containing lidocaine
* allergy to lidocaine
Minimum Eligible Age

19 Years

Maximum Eligible Age

80 Years

Eligible Sex

ALL

Accepts Healthy Volunteers

No

Sponsors

Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.

University of British Columbia

OTHER

Sponsor Role collaborator

Simon Fraser University

OTHER

Sponsor Role lead

Responsible Party

Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.

Dr. Victoria Claydon

Assistant Professor

Responsibility Role PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Principal Investigators

Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.

Victoria E Claydon, PhD

Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR

Simon Fraser University and International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries (ICORD)

Locations

Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.

Simon Fraser University

Burnaby, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

International Collaboration on Repair Discoveries

Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada

Site Status

Countries

Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.

Canada

Provided Documents

Download supplemental materials such as informed consent forms, study protocols, or participant manuals.

Document Type: Study Protocol and Statistical Analysis Plan

View Document

Other Identifiers

Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.

2011s0593

Identifier Type: -

Identifier Source: org_study_id

More Related Trials

Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.