Intrathecal Morphine Administration Using Implantable Pump With Continuous or Programmable Flow
NCT ID: NCT01567345
Last Updated: 2024-08-02
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
54 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2009-01-14
2010-10-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Intelligent Pain Management System for Assessing Pain in Cancer Patients
NCT02765269
Early Interventional Treatment for Cancer Pain
NCT05366413
Observational Study of Pain Reduction in Late-Stage Cancer Patients Who Are Receiving Low-Dose Chemotherapy
NCT02443675
Observational Study of Incidence of Breakthrough Cancer Pain and How it is Treated
NCT02069067
Ambulatory Cancer Pain Management: A Feasibility Study
NCT00507351
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Treatment of cancer pain is generally based on the WHO analgesic ladder according to 3 steps. Patients with advanced cancer are often treated at WHO step 3 analgesics, i.e. morphine and its derivatives, at high dosages. But increasing the dosage of opioids also leads to accentuation of their adverse events and the corresponding risks.
At this stage of the disease, in patients with failure of conventional analgesic therapy, intrathecal injection of analgesics can be decided in order to relieve pain. 2 types of pumps allow intrathecal morphine administration : continuous or programmable flow. In this study, we want to compare the quality of analgesia obtained through these 2 flows.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
PARALLEL
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Intrathecal pump with continuous flow
After placement of the implantable pump, continuous flow is scheduled by physician and the patient can't modify it.
Implantable pump with continuous flow
Insertion of an implantable pump filled up with the analgesic solution. Connection of the catheter to the intrathecal space. Continuous morphine's flow is scheduled.
Intrathecal pump with programmable flow.
After placement of the implantable pump, programmable flow is scheduled by physician and patient can do himself morphine bolus injections for a better control of acute episodes of pain.
Implantable pump with programmable flow.
Insertion of an implantable pump filled up with the analgesic solution. Connection of the catheter to the intrathecal space. Programmable morphine's flow is scheduled.
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Implantable pump with continuous flow
Insertion of an implantable pump filled up with the analgesic solution. Connection of the catheter to the intrathecal space. Continuous morphine's flow is scheduled.
Implantable pump with programmable flow.
Insertion of an implantable pump filled up with the analgesic solution. Connection of the catheter to the intrathecal space. Programmable morphine's flow is scheduled.
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patient with advanced cancer.
* Patient with severe pain, i.e. a mean daily pain score \> or = 5 on an numeric rating scale.
* Failure of optimal conventional analgesic therapy : either due to intolerable adverse events or to lack of efficacy, i.e. after having tried opioid rotation techniques, different way of administration, use of rapid-acting narcotics to control acute episodes of pain, use of intravenous morphine by PCA pump.
* Possibility of return home
* Dated and signed informed consent form.
Exclusion Criteria
* Ongoing pregnancy.
* Ongoing systemic infection.
* Injection site infection.
* Estimated survival less than 90 days.
* Allergy or intolerance to morphine.
* Contraindication to implantation of an intrathecal catheter.
* Patient treated with a powerful CYP1A2 inhibitor, such as fluvoxamine or enoxacin.
* Intrathecal chemotherapy planned.
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Denis Dupoiron, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Cancerologie de l'Ouest
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
ICO Paul Papin
Angers, , France
Institut Bergonié
Bordeaux, , France
Centre Hospitalier
Laon, , France
Centre Oscar Lambret
Lille, , France
Hôpital Laennec
Nantes, , France
Polyclinique
Poitiers, , France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2008-005087-14
Identifier Type: EUDRACT_NUMBER
Identifier Source: secondary_id
CPP-401
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.