Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
UNKNOWN
NA
50 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-11-30
2014-12-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Impact of Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping on Patient Reported Lower Extremity Limb Dysfunction in Stage I Endometrial Cancer
NCT05646316
Sentinel Lymph Node Detection in Early Cervical Cancer
NCT02543775
Investigating the Use of Fluorescence Imaging in Endometrial Cancer Surgery
NCT01562106
Comparison of Two-Position and Four-Position Cervical Injection Techniques for Sentinel Lymph Node Mapping in Endometrial Cancer Using Methylene Blue
NCT07040657
Use of the Sentinel Node Biopsy for Early Endometrial Cancer.
NCT02545348
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
There is no agreement regarding the best technique to do SLNB in women with uterine cancer and this procedure is still at the stage of determining feasibility. Since 1996, there have been publications aiming to determine the most appropriate way to do sentinel node in uterine cancer. As the uterus cannot be reached preoperatively for tracer injection, the standard approach for other tumor sites of preoperative peritumoral injection of Technetium 99 followed by intraoperative injection of blue dye has needed to be modified. Blue dye with or without a radiocolloid have been administered either subserously (the uterus outer layer), cervically, dually, and hysteroscopically with a wide range of results in terms of identification rates of sentinel nodes. Certain factors as site of injection, volume and number of injections, interval time since injection to identification of sentinel nodes and surgical approach as laparotomy versus laparoscopy have been associated with the likelihood of identifying these nodes.
This study plans to determine the pattern of lymphatic drainage for the cervix and corpus of the uterus by injecting a different tracer in these 2 sites and also to incorporate all factors that have been proved to be associated with a better identification rate of sentinel nodes in a protocol in order to determine if this technique is feasible and reliable.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Sentinel Node Biopsy
Each participant will have both measurements, the new diagnostic test (sentinel node biopsy) and the gold standard (complete lymphadenectomy)
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Sentinel node biopsy after injections of 0.4 mci of Technetium 99 in the cervix and 4 mL of Patent Blue into the myometrium followed by standard retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy
Sentinel node biopsy after injections of 0.4 mci of Technetium 99 in the cervix and 4 mL of Patent Blue into the myometrium followed by standard retroperitoneal lymph node dissection
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Endometrial cancer
3. Histologies: Grade 2 and 3 endometrioid adenocarcinoma, clear cell and papillary serous carcinoma
4. Suitable candidates for surgery
5. Clinically stage 1 or confined to the uterus
Exclusion Criteria
2. Metastatic disease
18 Years
FEMALE
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Juravinski Cancer Centre Foundation
OTHER
Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Waldo G Jimenez, MD MSc
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
McMaster University
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Juravinski Hospital, Juravinski Cancer Centre, McMaster University
Hamilton, Ontario, Canada
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Central Contacts
Reach out to these primary contacts for questions about participation or study logistics.
Facility Contacts
Find local site contact details for specific facilities participating in the trial.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
SNEndometrialCa
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.