Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
TERMINATED
PHASE2
21 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-06-30
2016-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Ruxolitinib W/ Preop Chemo For Triple Negative Inflammatory Brca
NCT02041429
Ruxolitinib in Estrogen Receptor Positive Breast Cancer
NCT01594216
Ruxolitinib for Premalignant Breast Disease
NCT02928978
Study Of Ruxolitinib (INCB018424) With Preoperative Chemotherapy For Triple Negative Inflammatory Breast Cancer
NCT02876302
Phase II Study of Erlotinib, an EGFR Inhibitor in Metastatic EGFR-positive 'Triple Receptor-negative' Breast Cancer
NCT00739063
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Primary
* The primary objective of this two-stage, phase II study is to estimate the objective response rate to ruxolitinib in patients with metastatic or unresectable locally advanced breast cancer which is pStat3+ and which has progressed on at least one line of chemotherapy for advanced disease, and/or has recurred within 12 months of completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy.
Secondary
* To describe the toxicity profile
* To evaluate clinical benefit rate (CR + PR + SD \>/= 24 weeks)
* To estimate progression-free and overall survival
Exploratory
* To explore whether baseline hs-CRP level higher than the group median is associated with objective response
* To explore whether baseline IL-6 level higher than the group median is associated with objective response
* To describe hs-CRP level over time, and to describe the proportion of patients with a) hs-CRP \> 3mg/L at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression, and b) hs-CRP \> 1mg/L at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression
* To describe IL-6 level over time, and to describe the proportion of patients with IL-6 level above the upper limit of normal at baseline, on treatment, and at time of progression
* To describe pStat3 status by IHC in baseline metastatic biopsies
* To describe pStat3 status by IHC in on-study biopsies
* To describe pStat3 status by IHC in the time of progression biopsy samples
* To characterize archival and metastatic biopsy samples using triple immunofluorescence for CD44, CD24, and pStat3
* To characterize archival and metastatic biopsy samples using a previously characterized pStat3 gene signature
* To characterize circulating tumor cells (CTCs) for CD44, CD24, and pStat3 at baseline and time of progression
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NON_RANDOMIZED
SINGLE_GROUP
TREATMENT
NONE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Ruxolitinib-Cohort A
Patients received Ruxolitinib 25 mg twice daily for up to 12 cycles (cycle duration=28 days) until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled sequentially into two possible cohorts based on pStat3+ expression score by central testing: Cohort A - moderate to high positive status defined as a score of \>/=5 by central testing or Cohort B - low positive status defined as a score of 3-4. Each cohort was evaluated with a 2 stage design. Cohort B only opened if 2 objective responses were observed in 1st stage Cohort A patients (n=21).
Ruxolitinib
Ruxolitinib-Cohort B
Patients received Ruxolitinib 25 mg twice daily for up to 12 cycles (cycle duration=28 days) until evidence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients enrolled sequentially into two possible cohorts based on pStat3+ expression score by central testing: Cohort A - moderate to high positive status defined as a score of \>/=5 by central testing or Cohort B - low positive status defined as a score of 3-4. Each cohort was evaluated with a 2 stage design. Cohort B only opened if 2 objective responses were observed in 1st stage Cohort A patients (n=21).
Ruxolitinib
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Ruxolitinib
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Must have known ER, PR and HER2 status
* Either, Triple Negative Metastatic Breast Cancer or
* Inflammatory Breast Cancer with any ER, PR HER2 status
* Availability of archival tissue specimen suitable for pStat3 testing
* Life expectancy of greater than 3 months
* Measurable disease by RECIST
* At least one prior chemotherapy regimen for treatment of metastatic breast cancer and/or recurrence within 12 months of completion of neoadjuvant/adjuvant chemotherapy or
* For patients with inflammatory breast cancer but no distant metastases, progression through standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy is required
Exclusion Criteria
* Active brain metastases
* History of allergic reactions attributed to compounds of similar chemical or biologic composition to ruxolitinib
* Clinically significant malabsorption syndrome
* Concurrent use of medications/substances that are strong inhibitors of CY3A4
* No uncontrolled intercurrent illness
18 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Nancy Lin, MD
Principal Investigator
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Massachusetts General Hospital
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
12-024
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.