Study Results
Outcome measurements, participant flow, baseline characteristics, and adverse events have been published for this study.
View full resultsBasic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
PHASE2/PHASE3
42 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2012-07-31
2014-08-31
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Effects of Marijuana on Neuropathic Pain and Spasticity in Spinal Cord Injury Patients
NCT06190470
Effects of CBD/CBD-A Oral Extract on Resting-state EEG and Neuropathic Pain Symptoms After SCI
NCT05630235
CBD for Lower Urinary Tract Dysfunction in Spinal Cord Injury
NCT06840899
Cannabinoids and an Anti-inflammatory Diet for the Treatment of Neuropathic Pain After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT04057456
Effect of Hypercapnia Treatment on Respiratory Recovery After Spinal Cord Injury
NCT05536076
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
This study will compare the analgesic and side effect profile of low (3.5%) to high dose (7.0%) delta 9-tetrahydrocannabinol in subjects with spinal cord injury pain. It is hypothesized that a low dose will produce a lesser degree of neuropsychological impairment while maintaining a similar degree of pain relief to the higher dose. The use of two different strengths will help determine tolerable dosing for the treatment of SCI neuropathic pain.
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
RANDOMIZED
CROSSOVER
TREATMENT
TRIPLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
Vaporization of Cannabis 6.7% THC
Inhaling of standardized measured puffs of Vaporized High Dose 6.7% THC. Monitored for 8 hours measuring psychoactive and analgesic effects.
Vaporization of Cannabis
Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial of Vaporized Cannabis using different strengths of THC in patients with Central Neuropathic Pain Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 6.7% THC Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 2.9% THC Placebo Comparator: Vaporized Placebo THC
Vaporization of Cannabis 2.9% THC
Inhaling standardized measured puffs of Vaporized Low Dose 2.9% THC. Monitored for 8 hours measuring psychoactive and analgesic effects.
Vaporization of Cannabis
Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial of Vaporized Cannabis using different strengths of THC in patients with Central Neuropathic Pain Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 6.7% THC Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 2.9% THC Placebo Comparator: Vaporized Placebo THC
Vaporization of Cannabis Placebo THC
Inhaling standardized measured puffs of Placebo THC. Monitored for 8 hours measuring psychoactive and analgesic effects.
Vaporization of Cannabis
Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial of Vaporized Cannabis using different strengths of THC in patients with Central Neuropathic Pain Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 6.7% THC Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 2.9% THC Placebo Comparator: Vaporized Placebo THC
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Vaporization of Cannabis
Randomized, Controlled Crossover Trial of Vaporized Cannabis using different strengths of THC in patients with Central Neuropathic Pain Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 6.7% THC Active Comparator: Vaporized High Dose 2.9% THC Placebo Comparator: Vaporized Placebo THC
Other Intervention Names
Discover alternative or legacy names that may be used to describe the listed interventions across different sources.
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
2. Pain intensity ≥ 4/10
3. Neuropathic pain defined as chronic pain in an area of sensory abnormality corresponding to the spinal cord or nerve root lesion, and the pain should have no primary relation to movement, inflammation or other local tissue damage
4. Leeds Assessment of Neuropathic Symptoms and Signs score greater than or equal to 12
5. Spinal cord injury of 3 or more months duration (to avoid spontaneous recovery obfuscating generalizability)
Exclusion Criteria
2. Clinically significant or unstable medical condition (i.e., cardiac, respiratory, hepatic or renal disease) that, in the opinion of the investigator, would compromise participation in the study
3. Neurologic disorders unrelated to spinal cord injury that may confound the assessment of the central neuropathic pain due to spinal cord injury (hereditary neuropathies; diabetic peripheral neuropathy; traumatic neuropathy; and immune-mediated neuropathies)
4. Active substance abuse within past year using "The Substance Abuse Module of Diagnostic Interview Schedule for DSM-IV
5. Pregnancy as ascertained by a self-report and a mandatory commercial pregnancy test
6. Currently on probation or parole.
7. Hx of Schizophrenia, Bipolar Depression with Mania, current suicidal ideation or past history of suicide attempt 8. Severe depression (Patient Health Questionnaire-9 ≥ 15) 9. Current suicidal ideation
18 Years
70 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
VA Northern California Health Care System
FED
University of California, San Diego
OTHER
National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)
NIH
Barth Wilsey
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Barth Wilsey
Research Professor
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
Barth Wilsey, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
UC San Diego, Department of Psychiatry
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
UC Davis CTSC Clinical Research Center , Sacramento VA Medical Center
Mather, California, United States
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Wilsey B, Marcotte T, Tsodikov A, Millman J, Bentley H, Gouaux B, Fishman S. A randomized, placebo-controlled, crossover trial of cannabis cigarettes in neuropathic pain. J Pain. 2008 Jun;9(6):506-21. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2007.12.010. Epub 2008 Apr 10.
Abrams DI, Jay CA, Shade SB, Vizoso H, Reda H, Press S, Kelly ME, Rowbotham MC, Petersen KL. Cannabis in painful HIV-associated sensory neuropathy: a randomized placebo-controlled trial. Neurology. 2007 Feb 13;68(7):515-21. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000253187.66183.9c.
Abrams DI, Vizoso HP, Shade SB, Jay C, Kelly ME, Benowitz NL. Vaporization as a smokeless cannabis delivery system: a pilot study. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Nov;82(5):572-8. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100200. Epub 2007 Apr 11.
Ellis RJ, Toperoff W, Vaida F, van den Brande G, Gonzales J, Gouaux B, Bentley H, Atkinson JH. Smoked medicinal cannabis for neuropathic pain in HIV: a randomized, crossover clinical trial. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2009 Feb;34(3):672-80. doi: 10.1038/npp.2008.120. Epub 2008 Aug 6.
Wallace M, Schulteis G, Atkinson JH, Wolfson T, Lazzaretto D, Bentley H, Gouaux B, Abramson I. Dose-dependent effects of smoked cannabis on capsaicin-induced pain and hyperalgesia in healthy volunteers. Anesthesiology. 2007 Nov;107(5):785-96. doi: 10.1097/01.anes.0000286986.92475.b7.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
256412
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.