Comparative Study of the Magnetically Guided Capsule Endoscopy Versus High Definition Gastroscopy
NCT ID: NCT01555840
Last Updated: 2019-06-18
Study Results
The study team has not published outcome measurements, participant flow, or safety data for this trial yet. Check back later for updates.
Basic Information
Get a concise snapshot of the trial, including recruitment status, study phase, enrollment targets, and key timeline milestones.
COMPLETED
NA
189 participants
INTERVENTIONAL
2011-11-30
2012-06-30
Brief Summary
Review the sponsor-provided synopsis that highlights what the study is about and why it is being conducted.
Related Clinical Trials
Explore similar clinical trials based on study characteristics and research focus.
Remote Manipulation of a Capsule Endoscope
NCT01044797
Detachable String Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy for Patients with AUGIB
NCT06725056
Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy Feasibility Study in Gastric Motility
NCT05004012
Real-Time Identification System of Magnetically Controlled Capsule Endoscopy Using Artificial Intelligence
NCT04203264
Computer Assisted Quality-monitoring for Magnet-controlled Capsule Endoscopy: a Prospective Case-control Study.
NCT04278196
Detailed Description
Dive into the extended narrative that explains the scientific background, objectives, and procedures in greater depth.
Participants will be recruited in two groups A) enriched population group (n=50): In both institutions, patients presenting for upper GI endoscopy with suspected or diagnosed focal lesions as follows; gastric tumors, submucosal tumor, gastric ulcer, polyp a)adenoma, b)hyperplastic polyp or angioectasia,ulcers for diagnostic confirmation, follow-up or planning of therapy will be informed and asked to participate in the study.
B) standard gastroscopy group (n=150): consecutive patients without prior gastroscopy presenting with the main indications reflux, upper abdominal complaints, anemia and anorexia. Here, recruitment is based on presenting symptoms.
6 endoscopists experienced in upper GI endoscopy (\> 1000 examinations) and specifically trained in capsule gastroscopy (simulator, 10 gastric capsule cases) will perform capsule gastroscopy. 2 well trained endoscopists (\> 1000 upper GI endoscopies), different from the capsule gastroscopists will perform subsequent gastroscopies. They receive standard information about gastroscopy indication from a list of indications. They are accompanied by a study nurse who knows patient details but ascertains examiner blindness and takes care of secondary unblinding during gastroscopy.
Gastroscopy is always performed after MGCE in this study with a maximum delay of 1 day but a minimum delay of 4 h due to water filling of the stomach with the capsule examination.
The study is a comparative study of capsule gastroscopy accuracy with conventio¬nal gastroscopy serving as gold standard as described above. Disease prevalence is enriched to include 25-30% of significant pathology such as tumors and ulcers. Confidence intervals will be calculated, e.g. for a disease prevalence of about 30% and 200 study cases, a sensitivity of 85% will have a 95% CI of 73-93%. Cross tabulation of the results of the index tests (including indeterminate and missing results) will be performed by the results of the reference standard. Study statistics will be done by Prof. Dr. Karl Wegscheider, University Hospital Hamburg/Eppendorf.
All patient data will be collected at Institut Arnault Tzanck in St. Laurent du Var. Data will be analyzed in pseudonymity way (code, age, sex) at the University of Hamburg. Original data will be stored for 10 years at Institut Arnault Tzanck in St. Laurent du Var
Conditions
See the medical conditions and disease areas that this research is targeting or investigating.
Study Design
Understand how the trial is structured, including allocation methods, masking strategies, primary purpose, and other design elements.
NA
SINGLE_GROUP
DIAGNOSTIC
SINGLE
Study Groups
Review each arm or cohort in the study, along with the interventions and objectives associated with them.
patients requiring upper GI endoscopy
patients with upper abdominal complaints requiring upper GI endoscopy
Magnetically Guided Capsule (MGCE)
"a) MGCE capsule The MGCE capsule is custom-made for observation of the stomach. It is 31 mm in length and 11 mm in diameter and equipped with two image sensors.
It contains a permanent magnet to enable magnetic guidance in the stomach by magnetic field." "b) Guidance system The magnet guidance system is custom-made to guide the MGCE capsule inside the stomach. It has a footprint of 1m× 2m and generates a very low level magnetic fields." c) Conventional gastroscope
Interventions
Learn about the drugs, procedures, or behavioral strategies being tested and how they are applied within this trial.
Magnetically Guided Capsule (MGCE)
"a) MGCE capsule The MGCE capsule is custom-made for observation of the stomach. It is 31 mm in length and 11 mm in diameter and equipped with two image sensors.
It contains a permanent magnet to enable magnetic guidance in the stomach by magnetic field." "b) Guidance system The magnet guidance system is custom-made to guide the MGCE capsule inside the stomach. It has a footprint of 1m× 2m and generates a very low level magnetic fields." c) Conventional gastroscope
Eligibility Criteria
Check the participation requirements, including inclusion and exclusion rules, age limits, and whether healthy volunteers are accepted.
Inclusion Criteria
* Patients with gastric symptoms and indicated for Upper GI endoscopy (Group B)
* Age of 18 years to 75 years"
Exclusion Criteria
* Patients with suspected or known intestinal stenoses
* Overt GI bleeding
* Known large and obstructing tumors of the upper GI tract
* Patients after upper GI surgery or abdominal surgery altering GI anatomy
* Patients under full anticoagulation
* Patient in poor general condition (ASA III/IV)
* Patients with claustrophobia
* Patients using equipment that may be affected by radio transmission
* Patients using equipment that may be affected by magnetic field
* Pregnancy or suspected pregnancy "
18 Years
75 Years
ALL
No
Sponsors
Meet the organizations funding or collaborating on the study and learn about their roles.
Institute Arnault Tzanck, France
OTHER
Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice
OTHER
Keio University
OTHER
Showa University Northern Yokohama Hospital, Japan
UNKNOWN
The Jikei University School of Medicine, Japan
UNKNOWN
Olympus Corporation
INDUSTRY
Siemens AG
INDUSTRY
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
OTHER
Responsible Party
Identify the individual or organization who holds primary responsibility for the study information submitted to regulators.
Principal Investigators
Learn about the lead researchers overseeing the trial and their institutional affiliations.
J F Rey, MD
Role: PRINCIPAL_INVESTIGATOR
Institut Arnault Tzanck, St. Laurent du Var, France
Locations
Explore where the study is taking place and check the recruitment status at each participating site.
Institut Arnault Tzanck , Avenue du Docteur Maurice Donat
Saint-Laurent-du-Var, Cote Azur, France
Countries
Review the countries where the study has at least one active or historical site.
References
Explore related publications, articles, or registry entries linked to this study.
Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo SE, Tajiri H. Blinded nonrandomized comparative study of gastric examination with a magnetically guided capsule endoscope and standard videoendoscope. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Feb;75(2):373-81. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.09.030. Epub 2011 Dec 9.
Rey JF, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Pangtay I, Hibi T, Kudo S, Tajiri H. Feasibility of stomach exploration with a guided capsule endoscope. Endoscopy. 2010 Jul;42(7):541-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1255521. Epub 2010 Jun 30.
Denzer UW, Rosch T, Hoytat B, Abdel-Hamid M, Hebuterne X, Vanbiervielt G, Filippi J, Ogata H, Hosoe N, Ohtsuka K, Ogata N, Ikeda K, Aihara H, Kudo SE, Tajiri H, Treszl A, Wegscheider K, Greff M, Rey JF. Magnetically guided capsule versus conventional gastroscopy for upper abdominal complaints: a prospective blinded study. J Clin Gastroenterol. 2015 Feb;49(2):101-7. doi: 10.1097/MCG.0000000000000110.
Other Identifiers
Review additional registry numbers or institutional identifiers associated with this trial.
2010-A01442-37(AFSSAPS)
Identifier Type: -
Identifier Source: org_study_id
More Related Trials
Additional clinical trials that may be relevant based on similarity analysis.